|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
tiptoe
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 10:28 AM Original message |
NY04 VOTESCAM MATH: KERRY TRUE VOTE=4.7m(64%) =4.3m(58.5%)RECORDED+ .4m(5.5%)URBAN LEGEND LEVER(age) |
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 10:54 AM by tiptoe
TRUTH IS ALL MATH: faulty Levers and/or corrupt human counters cut Kerry's NY "margin" by 750,000 votes! TruthIsAll http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/2004NewYorkLeverExitPollDiscepancies.htm Even highly regarded experts get it wrong once in a while. Richard Hayes Phillips, who did a comprehensive analysis which proved that Ohio 2004 was stolen, was no exception when he wrote that the NY exit polls matched the recorded vote. RHP made the same mistake that countless others make: he was referring to the Final Exit Poll — which is always forced to match the recorded vote. He should have checked the preliminary exit polls and read the Edison-Mitofsky Jan 2005 report (see below). In 2000, Gore won the NY recorded vote by 60–35–5%. In 2004, Kerry won by 58.5–40.2%. But Kerry won the unadjusted exit poll by 64–35%, which was identical to the Best Geo and Composite exit poll timeline results (see below). Based on the exit polls, Kerry’s NY margin should have been over 2.1 million votes, but he won the recorded vote by only 1.35 million. Kerry’s margin was reduced by 750,000 votes, which is 25% of Bush’s 3.0m recorded vote “mandate”. How could Kerry win by just an 18% margin, when Gore won by 25%? Where did Bush get his NY votes? It’s an Urban Legend. Read on. Everyone knew Kerry was going to win NY easily — especially Karl Rove. Bushco knew that winning the popular recorded vote was critical in order to make their “mandate” appear legitimate. They could not have a repeat of 2000, when Gore won the national recorded vote by 540,000 and NY by 1.7 million votes. In 2004, all indications were that Kerry would do even better than Gore. A massive Democratic registration and GOTV effort would bring at least 500,000 new voters. Bush was very unpopular in NY; his NY approval rating was much lower than his national 48%. So Bush had to find a way to keep Kerry’s margin down in order to get his popular vote “mandate”. This analysis shows that Kerry did much better in NY than the Recorded Vote indicates. The question is not if votes were stolen from Kerry; the question is how it happened. Those who claim to “love my Levers” are mistaken to believe that they are foolproof. They cannot verify and prove that their votes were counted accurately. In fact, historical evidence indicates that Lever machine vote counts are highly vulnerable to rigging — and not just in NY. It’s not a HAVA or Lever vs. Optical-scan issue. The issue is whether NY will have a verifiable vote count. Victoria Collier writes in Votescam: Many people still in power have yet to be held accountable for their role in aiding and abetting vote fraud. I'll give you two important examples. Famous Miami lawyer Ellis Rubin brought the original Votescam evidence to the Florida assistant State Attorney at the time, Janet Reno. The evidence included the shaved wheels of lever voting machines, forged canvass sheets, and pre-printed vote tally sheets. Reno refused to prosecute, claiming falsely that the statue of limitations had run out on the crime. Years later, Rubin would tell my father that behind closed doors Reno had stated that she could not prosecute. Why? Because she would bring down many of the most powerful people in the state. The Edison-Mitofsky state exit poll timeline (see below) shows how the exit poll discrepancies declined as they were adjusted by E-M prior to the final exit poll which was matched to the vote. The pristine, unadjusted exit poll data was not released by E–M until Jan.2005. Their report shows that the unadjusted exit poll discrepancies were greater than those which were downloaded by Jonathan Simon from the Internet at 12:22am. In other words, the full extent of the apparent fraud was much greater than the original estimate — but this was not known until three months after the election. Yet even the Election Day adjusted exit polls raised many red flags. Briefly, this is a summary of red flags which indicate that the NY 2004 election was rigged to inflate Bush’s mandate: Kerry won the NY recorded vote by: 58.5–40.2% (4.314–2.963m). There were 7.391m total votes recorded.
Naysayers cherry-picked the final NY pre-election poll in an attempt to promote the myth that the pre-election poll was correct and the exit poll was way off. In essence, they are claiming that the final pre-election poll matched a fraud-free recorded vote. But they can’t provide evidence that ALL the votes were counted accurately in ALL the precincts. They failed to consider late absentee and provisional ballots which provide further evidence that the vote count was bogus. There are fundamental flaws in their arguments.
NY 2004 Kerry Bush Other Total 4.314 2.963 .114 7.391 58.5% 40.2% 1.3% 100% NY 2000 Gore Bush Nader Other Total 4.108 2.403 .244 0.67 6.822 60.2% 35.2% 3.6% 1.0% 100% NY True Vote Calculation: Assumptions: 95% turnout of 2000 voters in 2004 1.22% annual voter mortality No uncounted votes Kerry vote shares reflect that his NY shares had to be higher than equivalent national (NEP) shares.
Notes:
NY Pre-election and Exit Polls Average Voting Machine WPE for all Exit Poll Precincts The Final 5 million votes Kerry Initial, Late and Final Vote Share (2-party) Initial and Final Recorded Votes Unadjusted State Exit Polls based on weighted average WPE National Exit Poll Timeline (Gender demographic) NY 2004 Election Calculator Scenario 2: Scenario 3 (most likely): Sensitivity Analysis This table shows how the state exit poll discrepancies declined as they were adjusted prior to the final. The pristine, unadjusted exit poll data was not released by Edison-Mitofsky until Jan.2005. The data indicated that the discrepancies were much greater than for the polls originally downloaded at 12:22am by Jonathan Simon. In other words, the full extent of the apparent fraud was much greater than the original estimate — but this was not known until three months after the election. http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/WPDConfirmation.htm Recorded Vote Edison-Mitofsky Exit Poll Estimates WPE (Within Precinct Error) Best GEO Composite 12:40 am
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
1. "a method used to hack mechanical voting machines (punch card or lever)"???? |
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 11:22 AM by Wilms
You might be the guy RHP refers to when he writes, "The writer claims that Harmon "forced a look at the actual lever machines (and) when he took them apart he saw where the teeth that were supposed to poke holes in the ballot were filed down to a nub and those ballots (only on the Democratic levers) were seen as undervotes where a person did not vote at all." This writer is confusing lever machines with punch card machines. Licking County used punch cards in the 2004 election to which this writer refers. Moreover, punch card ballots are punched by hand, by the voter, not by some mechanical device hidden within the machine".
:shrug: -on edit- I recommend this thread because more folk need to see that the "urban legend" looks more like an urban myth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill Bored
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. TIA, nnfortunately for you and your exit polls, lever machines can't switch votes. |
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 01:53 PM by Bill Bored
NY is becoming a bluer state in every election lately so unless you are a paid disruptor of some kind, I'd leave NY alone, or come up with another theory to explain your exit poll problem.
That goes for the guy in Virginia too where they have some of the most insecure, unverifiable elections in the country, and Webb still managed to squeeze out a victory in 2006! They may not be so lucky this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Jul-31-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Deleted message |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
foo_bar
![]() |
Sat Aug-02-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. nice to see everything's back to teh usual |
I guess the powers that be are letting it be, hard to keep a man down who thinks he's good. Why the Mouth of Bev is still with us is a mystery for DUologists, it's not like any good has ever come of it for anyone, unless these pre-verbal bon mots are captured for field research of developmental disorders. Even Bev would have to cringe, she might be a tool but at least she was capable of advancing her own cause (for a little while anyway). So yeah, it's somehow easier to believe that the Dem "machine" is handing votes to the repubs than exit polls being wrong in a city of 8 million. I mean the guy from new zealand has an excuse, as does Bev's man-child, but the ex-new yorker (if he's telling the truth) with the McLean area "press" job with copious vacation time certainly knows better. Do you suppose Big Paper would pay flaks to disparage levers as a loss of potential revenue? That's right HCPB sellouts, the only real solution is hand counted -hemp- paper ballots, otherwise you're part of the problem (if you took the Manichaean premise to its logical conclusion).
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe
![]() |
Tue Aug-05-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. You are right: NY 2004 was more blue than NY 2000. That's the point of the OP. (TIA Response) |
source: http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/2004NewYorkLeverExitPollDiscepancies.htm#bline
The Bottom Line NY is becoming bluer in every election. It was even bluer in 2004 than it was in 2000, when Gore won by 25%. Some suggest that the NY exit polls were off by 12%. What they are saying is that the recorded vote was equal to the True vote. With that logic, if the exits were also off by 12% everywhere else, then Bush must have won a 19m vote landslide with 57–42% (70–51 million). But the national WPE was 7% and Bush won by 3.0m votes (51–48%). Did Mitofsky have it in for New Yorkers? Why would lever states NY and CT be off the WPE map with 12% and 16%, respectively? To steal the 2004 election, Bushco needed to win the highly-contested states electoral votes as well as a solid popular vote mandate to make the theft appear legitimate. These were the most critical states where they had to get those votes:
2000: Gore 60%, Bush 35%, Nader/other 5% —Give 3/4 of Nader votes to Kerry, 1/4 to Bush. 2004: Kerry 63%, Bush 36%, Other 1% NY voted 10% higher for Kerry than the rest of the nation. According to the National Exit Poll, 10% of Bush voters defected to Kerry, and 8% of Gore voters defected to Bush (2% net to Kerry). It's safe to assume that in NY, net defection to Kerry was at least 3%. And Kerry won 57-61% of new voters nationwide. It's safe to assume that he had 63-67% of new voters in NY. Unless Bush won 16% of Gore voters and Kerry just 9% of Bush voters, there is no way that Kerry only had 58.5% of the vote. Even if levers are accurate (a big if), that doesn't mean the vote counters are honest. Naysayers love their levers and don't want them replaced by optical scanners. It would be like tearing down the Statue of Liberty. They are right. Optical scanners can be rigged. But for them to claim that the NY and CT exit polls (2–3% MoE) were uniquely off by 12–16% is really stretching it. How about HCPB? Why just assume that the votes were counted correctly? Trust, but verify. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand
![]() |
Wed Aug-06-08 06:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. "NY is becoming bluer in every election." |
And TIA knows this how?
The guy ought to stick to incomprehensible tables. Declarative sentences don't serve him well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe
![]() |
Wed Aug-06-08 09:02 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Calculation fix: |
Change this:
With that logic, if the exits were also off by 12% everywhere else, then Bush must have won a 19m vote landslide with 57–42% (70–51 million). But the national WPE was 7% and Bush won by 3.0m votes (51–48%). to this: By that logic, if all state exit polls were also off by 12%, Bush would have won in a landslide with 54–45% (66–55m). His actual recorded vote margin was 62–59m (50.7–48.3%). The unadjusted aggregate state exit polls indicated that Kerry won by 64–57m (52–47%). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tiptoe
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. correction of typo: |
Edited on Wed Jul-30-08 05:14 PM by tiptoe
re: "5. ...Bush won 58.5% of the initial 6.86m votes..." Change "Bush" to "Kerry" Should read: "5. ... Kerry won 58.5% of the initial 6.86m votes ..." Section in source modified: 5- They failed to consider late votes (absentee, provisional, etc.). There were a total of 7.36 million votes recorded in NY of which 500,000 were late and not recorded until a few days after the election. Kerry won 58.5% of the initial 6.86m votes; Kerry won 65.8% of the late 500,000 (very close to his 65% exit poll). There was a 12% difference in margin between the initial 116.2 million 2-party recorded vote (Bush 51.5–Kerry 48.5%) and the final 4.8m (Kerry 54.3–Bush 45.7%). This resulted in a 0.5m decline in the official Bush margin (3.5 to 3.0m). This red flag indicates that since the election was decided at the 116m mark, election fraud was no longer necessary. Late votes (absentees, etc.) became irrelevant when Bush was declared the winner. The media reported that Bush won by 3.5m votes; they still quote that initial margin today. Edison-Mitofsky matched the Final Exit Poll to the initial 117m recorded votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kster
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. kick.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Wed Jul-30-08 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. K*R - Outstanding!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadrasT
![]() |
Thu Jul-31-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. Kick! |
:kick:
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
![]() |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC