Early Voting in Ohio UPHELD, PollingPlace OBSERVERS for early Voting Slapped Down
Count 2 wins for SOS Brunner, but 1 win and 1 loss for Democracy
About an hour hour ago, (thanks to DUs Breaking News for the link) the NYT reported that the 6th Circuit Federal Court of appeals denied the Ohio GOPs appeal on all counts.
However, the trial court had granted in part and denied in part, and in one other part didn't reach the issue... It UPHELD Sec. of State Brunner's early voting, including same day registration for early voting in a victory for democracy, but it also struck down the trial court's allowance of polling place observers for early voting, upholding Brunner's policy but constituting a reversal of a win for democracy in the lower court's ruling.
The GOP's lawsuit was concerning a disputed early voting window that allows Ohio voters
to register and cast a ballot on the same day. At the very least, the GOP wanted those ballots segregated, but that request was also denied. Since segregation wasn't truly needed, score one for democracy.
But the 3 judge 6th Circuit Court of Appeals panel also slammed election transparency in the next breath -- while also defeating the GOPs request.
While the lower court didn't reach all the issues decided by the 5th Circuit panel, the part the lower court
Granted seemed to me to be an unqualified good thing, and a reasonable request well-founded in law.
Sadly, the
6th Circuit panel REVERSED the trial court's TRO that required, (against SOS Brunner's express policy that denied this right)
polling place observers be allowed to observe early voting. The trial court had ordered poll observers to be allowed in the name of election integrity (basically) and specifically alluded to the fact that in no way did observers burden the right to vote, it only inconvenienced (at best) the state, and increased the chance of a fraud-FREE election.
But the Court of Appeals claimed this pro-transparency lower court ruling sought and won by the GOP was an "abuse of discretion." Unbelievable.
The New York Times Summary on this Issue:
The appeals court also gave Brunner a second victory, rejecting a GOP challenge to her advisory that county boards of elections weren't required to allow poll observers during early voting.
A federal judge in Columbus issued a temporary restraining order against Brunner's instructions Monday. But the appeals court overturned that ruling, saying the district court had abused its discretion in granting the order.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Ohio-Early-Voting.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Two Big Victories for Brunner, but one clear Defeat for Democracy,
Same day registration and voting, with proper ID, is ok and practiced this year in 9 states, even on Election day itself. But wherever there is voting, its hard to justify denying the right of the parties to observe it, just like on election day.
More ominously, the unequal treatment of early voters vs Election Day voters, and the refusal of the 6th Circuit to segregate the ballots, sets up an opportunity for the US Supreme Court, citing Bush v. Gore, to void out the Ohio results -- if they go a certain way the US Supremes don't like. On the other hand, of course the GOP won't appeal and the Supremes won't hear the case, and this scenario won't happen.
You'll probably hear more from me on this, but OPTION is the election law concept for 2008. The US Supreme Court has a whole series of options that it can exercise, or NOT exercise, in order to knock out the electoral college votes of specific states.
Here's one way they can kill Ohio, if Obama wins. If you doubt that the US Supremes won't terminate an election, you've forgotten Florida 2000 and Bush v. Gore, terminating the election during the recount. If you think a political decision can't be made to not allow electors to be seated, you've forgotten the Dem objections to OHio in 2004. If you think the Republicans can't play the same game, but with their strict rule of Bush v. Gore and a friendly Supreme Court on their side, and knock out a state's votes or electoral college delegates, my friend, you're sleeping through history and election law and all the news these last 8 years.
As I wrote in the book "Loser Take All" (Mark Crispin Miller, ed.) there's also an easy California scenario as well. I don't get a penny of royalties for the book, so read the book. I'm going to ask the publishers if i can distribute copies of my own work or not. You can ask if you'd like a copy, then I'll send, if I can. But if you can afford the book, please buy it. No money to me.
More later.
On edit: HINT: IF the US Supreme Court decides NOT to hear a case, that's not "staying out of politics" at all -- that's saying "we're ok with the status quo" -- and can be just as momentous as taking a case and deciding a Bush v. Gore