Hardly known for vigor or vigilance, the Federal Election Commission is about to undergo well-deserved scrutiny from President-elect Barack Obama’s administration. The regulator of federal campaigns has a long record of creating loopholes and looking the other way when it comes to policing easy political money.
Mr. Obama has assigned a study of the panel’s insular, fitful operations. We hope it’s in preparation for a complete overhaul aimed at truly independent regulation in the public interest — not more catering to wheel-horse appointees from both parties scheming to circumvent, not uphold, the election laws.
The six-member commission has become nigh unto dysfunctional as the three Republican appointees vote together to block any effort to penalize campaign abusers, producing 3-to-3 standoffs on enforcement.
The three naysayers rejected a conciliation agreement, worked out by commission staffers, settling obvious violations despite the fact that the accused offender — a political offshoot of the United States Chamber of Commerce — accepted the agreement and its penalties. The three also forced a retreat from penalizing a worker who admitted to tapping $65,000 in campaign money for his private accounts. And a candidate who already paid a fine for wholesale filing failures found his check returned after another 3-to-3 deadlock, according to the independent BNA Money and Politics newsletter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/opinion/20tue3.html?th&emc=th