Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY: Will Hoboken City Council adopt IRV and ditch lever machines? 6/3?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:45 AM
Original message
NY: Will Hoboken City Council adopt IRV and ditch lever machines? 6/3?
Because you can't rank choices with lever machines. How else would
Sequoia sell their Rube Goldberg Machines without IRV?


they decide Wednesday (today by time you read this)

Will Hoboken City Council eliminate runoff elections?
There's a measure on the council agenda for Wednesday, June 3, to eliminate runoff elections and save up to $75,000. The suggestion on the agenda is to use a new idea called "Instant Runoff Voting" (IRV). In IRV, voters choose a first, second, third, fourth, etc. choice. At first, only first choices are tabulated, just like in a regular election.

But if no one gets more than 50 percent, the result is not a runoff. Instead, the candidate receiving the fewest first choices is eliminated. People who voted for that candidate will then have their second-choice votes counted toward the others.

As the website for IRV says, "This process continues until one candidate receives a majority and is elected."

So for example, in this past Hoboken election, all of the voters who supported the sixth-place candidate would then have their ballots counted toward their second choice instead. If that wasn't enough to put that person over the top, then the people who supported the fifth-choice candidate would have THEIR second-choice added to the others. And so on.

Confusing? Comment below! And see if the council keeps the resolution on the agenda and votes on it this Wednesday.
http://hudsonreporter.com/pages/full_story?article--Will%20Hoboken%20City%20Council%20eliminate%20runoff%20elections-%20=&page_label=home_top_section&id=2655535--Will+Hoboken+City+Council+eliminate+runoff+elections-&widget=push&instance=up_to_the_minute_lead_story_left_column&open=&

Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
NJGeek Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. IRV is what Ireland uses and its awesome
It lends itself to multi-party democracy and away from two-party systems. It would be awesome if we adopted IRV-STV (instant runoff voting with a single transferrable vote) in the USA
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ireland has one party rule -after 80 yrs of STV (a form of IRV)
How awesome is that? One party has virtually a monopoly.
STV has been in use in Ireland for over 80 years. Despite its use, one party, Fianna Fáil, has formed the government in all but 19 years since 1932. From 1932 to 1989 it formed a majority government after all but 5 elections. Since 1989 it has been the major party in 7 coalition governments, failing to form government only from 1994-97. It is currently government in coalition with the 6 Greens and 2 Progressive Democrats. Canadians recently reacted strongly against the idea of a coalition government.

http://www.nostv.org/world.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Burlington VT: the Green Party & indie candidates eliminated in first round
All that hassle and the ultimate winner was the one guy everyone liked the least.

IRV suffers from many perversities AND makes elections non transparent.

And incentivizes computerized vote counting.

City attorney: IRV vote must wait
By John Briggs, Free Press Staff Writer • May 15, 2009

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090515/NEWS02/905150313
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Nothing awesome about it. Just more computers running elections.
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 09:11 PM by Bill Bored
Tell us how to figure out who won without software, and then we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Levers to electonic? IRV yet another design to require computers, with more concern for access than
accuracy.

I want to feel assured of who got the most votes, of any rank or vote share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. HELL NO.
My god, the opportunities for confusion and obfuscation are AMAZING with that.

And if you hated all those other candidates, would they then get to say they had your support? Or a mandate?

There really is one born every minute. But why is it always an elected official?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. wow, I have to read more. Hoboken has always had very serious but fairly low tech fraud
i managed the polls one year, machined were delivered unsealed by the (future) mayor's father in law.
little did they know he was also future inmate #9257wi3649.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's Jersey -- not NY. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC