|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
WillE (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-18-09 11:33 AM Original message |
A Recursive True Vote Model (1968-2008) |
Edited on Sun Oct-18-09 11:35 AM by WillE
A Recursive True Vote Model (1968-2008) TruthIsAll http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/RecursiveTrueVoteModel.htm A Recursive True Vote Model (1968-2008) TruthIsAll In the first game of the 1954 World Series, Willie Mays made a miracle over-the-head catch. He implicitly calculated the mathematical trajectory of the ball at the crack of the bat using his built-in computer. http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/mayscatch.jpg Calculating the True Vote is more complex; the trajectory equation changes over time as the dynamics of the electorate change. The current election equation is a recursive function of the prior. It's all in the MATH. http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/ExposingEndemicElectionFraudSince1968.htm The Recursive True Vote Model calculates the True Vote for all since 1968. Data input (shown below) consists of recorded and total votes cast, Final National Exit Poll shares (1988-2008); estimated vote shares (1968-1984) required to match the recorded vote, annual voter mortality and previous election voter turnout. The returning voter mix is calculated using the following methods -depending on the objective: Method 1 The Final NEP adjusts the mix to force a match to the recorded vote. This implicitly assumes that all elections, not just the current, are fraud-free. The process of matching to the official vote required that millions of phantom Bush phantoms came to vote in 1988, 1992, 2004 and 2008 (turnout exceeds 100%). The official vote counts cannot be correct. Method 2 The mix is based on prior recorded votes and does not include millions of uncounted votes. Method 3(True Vote) The mix is based on total votes cast in the previous and current election. The cumulative impact of earlier elections is not taken into account. Method 4 (Recursive True Vote) The problem of the Final National Exit Poll perpetuating endemic fraud of each election is eliminated. Starting with the 1968 election, the model sequentially derives a feasible returning vote mix. True vote shares cast in the previous election are reduced by voter mortality and turnout in the current election and new voters are added to the mix. The model used Final National Exit Poll vote shares – except for 2004 when the vote shares were radically changed to match the official tally. Preliminary 12:22am NEP vote shares were used to calculate the True Vote. The model indicates that two elections were definitely stolen (2000 and 2004) and probably two others (1968 and 1988) as well. In order to match the official vote, there had to be an average 94% turnout of returning Democrats and 106% of Republicans. The average Republican turnout was 114% when Nixon and Bush were the incumbents; it was 98% otherwise. The average True Vote discrepancy was 10.3% when Nixon and Bush were incumbents; it was 3.6% otherwise. In 1968, Nixon won the official vote by 0.5m. Humphrey won the True Vote by 2 million. There were 6 million uncounted votes. In 1972, Nixon won a 17 million vote landslide with 61.8% of the vote. His True Vote share was 57.6%. There were 9.5 million uncounted votes. In 1976, Carter won the official vote by 1.7m. He won the True Vote by 4.5 million. There were 6.7 million uncounted votes. In 1980, Reagan defeated Carter by 8 million votes. In 1984, Reagan defeated Mondale by 17 million votes. In 1988, Bush won the official vote by 7.0m. Dukakis may have won a squeaker. There were 10.6 million uncounted votes. In 1992, Clinton won the official vote by 6m. He won the True Vote by over 20 million. There were 9.5 million uncounted votes. Independent candidate Ross Perot had 19% of the recorded vote. In 1996, Clinton won the official vote by 8m. He won the True Vote by 16 million. There were 8.7 million uncounted votes. Independent candidate Ross Perot had 10% of the vote. In 2000, Gore won the official vote by 0.54 million. He won the True Vote by 4 million. There were 5.4 million uncounted votes. But he lost in Scotus by ONE vote. In 2004, Bush won the official vote by 3.0m. Kerry won the True Vote by 10 million. The Final National Exit Poll forced a match to the recorded vote. It had an impossible 43/37% Bush/Gore returning voter split. There were 3.4 million net uncounted votes. HAVA guess how many were stuffed or switched? In 2008, Obama won the official vote by 9.5m. He won the True Vote by over 20 million. The Final National Exit Poll forced a match to the recorded vote. It had an impossible 46/37% Bush/Kerry returning voter split. http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/RecursiveTrueVoteModel6808_8076_image001.gif http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/RecursiveTrueVoteModel6808_12627_image001.gif http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/RecursiveTrueVoteModel6808_8143_image001.gif In mathematical terms, TV(i,j) = TV(i-1,k)* VS(k,j), k=1,4; j=1,3 where TV(i,j) = True Vote Cast for candidate (j) in election (i), VS(k,j) = Share of Candidate j shares of Returning and new voters (k). 2008 True Vote TV(2008,1)= Obama = 58.2% TV(2008,2)= McCain= 40.3% TV(2008,3)= Other = 1.5%% 2004 True Vote TV(2004,1)= Kerry = 53.6% TV(2004,2)= Bush = 45.4% TV(2004,3)= Other = 1.3% Obama Vote shares VS(1,1)= 73% of DNV VS(2,1)= 89% of Kerry VS(3,1)= 17% of Bush VS(4,1)= 66% of Other McCain Vote Shares VS(1,2)= 27% of DNV VS(2,2)= 9% of Kerry VS(3,2)= 82% of Bush VS(4,2)= 24% of Other Other Vote Shares VS(1,3)= 0% of DNV VS(2,3)= 2% of Kerry VS(3,3)= 1% of Bush VS(4,3)= 10% of Other 2008 Likely voter (LV) pre-election polls are a subset of Registered voter (RV) polls. LV polls do not include many newly registered voters. In the last 5 elections, Democrats won new voters by a 15% average margin. Obviously, LV polls understate the Democratic vote in high-turnout elections. In 2004, there were 22 million new voters. Kerry won the group by nearly 20%. Obama won new voters by 71-27%. Pre-election Likely Voter tracking polls had Obama leading by 50-43% before undecided voters were allocated (UVA). Pre-election Registered Voter polls had Obama leading by 53-40% before UVA. With UVA, Obama was leading by 57-42%. Based on the 2004 recorded vote, Obama had 55.2%. Obama won the True Vote (below) with 58.2%. Cast Record Alive Voted 2008 Final NEP Vote shares 2004 2004 2004 2008 2008 Turnout Mix Obama McCain Other DNV - - - - 16.44 11.9% 73% 27% 0% Kerry 67.13 59.03 63.77 61.86 61.86 47.1% 89% 9% 2% Bush 56.96 62.04 54.11 52.49 52.49 39.9% 17% 82% 1% Other 1.65 1.23 1.57 1.52 1.52 1.2% 66% 26% 8% Total 125.74 122.30 119.45 115.87 132.31 100% 58.09% 40.48% 1.43% Cast Recorded Total 76.86 53.56 1.90 Kerry 53.39% 48.27% Record 52.87% 45.60% 1.53% Bush 45.30% 50.73% 131.46 69.50 59.95 2.01 Other 1.31% 1.00% 2004 Bush had an 48% approval rating on Election Day. There were 22 million new voters - mostly Democratic. Returning Gore voters were out for blood. Nader voters were defecting to Kerry. It should have been a slam-dunk. And it was. Kerry won the True Vote by a landslide. But only the recorded vote counts. And Bush "won" by 3 million recorded votes. To match the recorded vote, the exit pollsters had to adjust the returning Bush/Gore voter mix in the Final National Exit Poll to an impossible 43/37% - which meant there were 52.6m returning Bush voters. But Bush only had 50.5 million votes in 2000. Approximately 48 million were still alive and 47 million voted in 2004. However, just changing the mix was not sufficient to match Bush's official 62 million tally. The exit pollsters also had to raise Bush vote shares from the 12:22am NEP. His share of new voters jumped from 41% to 45%; Gore voters from 8% to 10%; Bush voters from 90% to 91%. It makes no sense to apply the bogus Final 2004 NEP (13660 respondents) vote shares to calculate the True Vote. The 12:22am update (13047 respondents) shares are used. The sensitivity analyses tables confirmed a Kerry landslide. In the worst case returning vote scenario (Gore 90%, Bush 98%), Kerry wins by 7.8 million votes. In the worst case vote share scenario, Kerry had 8% of returning Bush voters and 55% share of new voters. He wins by 9.4 million votes. According to the Final NEP, Bush needed an impossible 112% turnout of returning Bush 2000 voters to match the official vote. Gore turnout had to be 95%. Cast Record Alive Voted 2004 12:22am NEP vote shares 2000 2000 2000 2004 2004 Turnout Mix Kerry Bush Other DNV - - - - 22.56 15.6% 57% 41% 2% Gore 55.79 51.00 53.00 51.94 51.94 42.5% 91% 8% 1% Bush 51.05 50.46 48.50 47.53 47.53 38.9% 10% 90% 0% Other 3.99 3.96 3.79 3.71 3.71 3.0% 64% 17% 19% Total 110.83 105.42 105.28 103.18 125.74 100% 53.39% 45.30% 1.31% Cast Recorded Total 67.13 56.96 1.65 Gore 50.34% 48.38% Record 48.27% 50.73% 1.00% Bush 46.06% 47.86% 122.30 59.03 62.04 1.23 Other 3.60% 3.76% 2000 Gore was running coming off a prior Clinton landslide. On Election Day 2000, Slick Willie still enjoyed high approval ratings - despite that cheap cigar. There were 5.4 million net (of stiffed) uncounted votes. Figure 75% to Gore. Do the math. He won the True Vote by approximately 5.5 million. Cast Record Alive Voted 2000 Final NEP vote shares 1996 1996 1996 2000 2000 Turnout Mix Gore Bush Other DNV - - - - 15.05 9.1% 52% 43% 5% Clinton 56.34 47.40 53.53 51.39 51.39 48.7% 82% 15% 3% Dole 39.03 39.20 37.08 35.60 35.60 33.8% 7% 91% 2% Perot 9.64 9.68 9.16 8.79 8.79 8.3% 39% 49% 12% Total 105.02 96.28 99.77 95.78 110.83 100% 50.34% 46.06% 3.60% Cast Recorded Total 55.79 51.05 3.99 Clinton 53.65% 49.23% Record 48.38% 47.86% 3.76% Dole 37.17% 40.71% 105.42 51.00 50.46 3.96 Perot 9.18% 10.05% 1996 Clinton enjoyed high popularity in a recovering economy; the deficit was turning into a surplus. He had won a major landslide in 1992 with Independent Perot capturing 20% of the vote (most would have gone to Poppy Bush). In 1996, Perot had just 10%. Approximately 42% of returning 1992 Perot voters defected to Dole and 32% to Clinton. Clinton's True Vote share increased from 51.8% to 53.6%. Cast Record Alive Voted 1996 Final NEP vote shares 1992 1992 1992 1996 1996 Turnout Mix Clinton Dole Perot DNV - - - - 9.83 1.1% 55% 33% 12% Clinton 59.07 44.91 56.12 49.39 49.39 51.3% 85% 9% 6% Bush 35.12 39.11 33.36 29.36 29.36 30.5% 13% 82% 5% Perot 19.67 20.41 18.69 16.45 16.45 17.1% 32% 42% 26% Total 113.87 104.42 108.17 95.19 105.02 100% 53.65% 37.17% 9.18% Cast Recorded Total 56.34 39.03 9.64 Clinton 51.88% 43.01% Record 49.23% 40.71% 10.05% Bush 30.84% 37.45% 96.28 47.40 39.20 9.68 1992 Bush was running as a very unpopular incumbent (S&L, Iran-Contra, exploding deficit, imploding economy. Clinton was poised to win late undecideds. Perot was running as a strong Independent candidate - mostly pulling votes from Bush. It was a major landslide, much bigger than the official 6 million vote margin. The True Vote model indicates that Clinton had 52%, Perot 17%, Bush 31%. Without Perot, it probably would have been 57-43%. Cast Record Alive Voted 1992 Final NEP vote shares 1988 1988 1988 1992 1992 Turnout Mix Clinton Bush Perot DNV - - - - 18.70 8.9% 46% 25% 29% Dukakis 51.67 41.81 49.09 48.11 48.11 46.1% 83% 5% 12% Bush 49.52 48.89 47.04 46.10 46.10 44.1% 21% 59% 20% Other 1.03 0.90 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.9% 32% 30% 38% Total 102.22 91.60 97.11 95.17 113.87 100% 51.88% 30.84% 17.28% Cast Recorded Total 59.07 35.12 19.67 Dukakis 50.55% 45.65% Record 43.01% 37.45% 19.54% Bush 48.44% 53.37% 104.42 44.91 39.11 20.41 1988 This was the beginning of the Bush reign of terror. The Iran-Contra scandal. along with a sliding economy, had taken it's toll on Reagan/Bush. Dukakis was the early favorite. But this was a Bush running; the Mighty Wurlitzer was in place. CNN ambushed Dukakis in the first question of the first debate by letting Willie Horton loose. But Dukakis may have won anyway. If the 10.6 million (net of stuffed) uncounted votes had been counted, it would have been much closer than the bogus official 7 million Bush margin. And the unadjusted exit polls showed a dead-heat. Cast Record Alive Voted 1988 Final NEP vote shares 1984 1984 1984 1988 1988 Turnout Mix Dukakis Bush Other DNV - - - - 11.25 0.7% 47% 51% 2% Mondale 43.81 37.58 41.62 39.12 39.12 42.7% 92% 7% 1% Reagan 57.44 54.46 54.57 51.30 51.30 56.0% 19% 80% 1% Other 0.62 0.62 0.59 0.56 0.56 0.6% 49% 50% 1% Total 101.88 92.65 96.78 90.98 102.22 100% 50.55% 48.44% 1.01% Cast Recorded Total 51.67 49.52 1.03 Mondale 43.00% 40.56% Record 45.65% 53.37% 0.98% Reagan 56.39% 58.77% 91.60 41.81 48.89 0.90 1984 It was a landslide. No cheating was necessary. Cast Record Alive Voted 1984 Required to match recorded 1980 1980 1980 1984 1984 Turnout Mix Mondale Reagan Other DNV - - - - 17.89 9.3% 31% 68% 1% Carter 39.71 35.48 37.72 35.83 35.83 38.7% 82% 18% 0% Reagan 46.14 43.90 43.84 41.64 41.64 44.9% 11% 88% 1% Anderson 7.22 7.19 6.86 6.51 6.51 7.0% 49% 50% 1% Total 93.07 86.58 88.41 83.99 101.88 100% 43.00% 56.39% 0.61% Cast Recorded Total 43.81 57.44 0.62 Carter 42.66% 40.99% Record 40.56% 58.77% 0.67% Reagan 49.58% 50.71% 92.65 37.58 54.46 0.62 1980 Carter wanted to do some good things: conserve energy; bring peace to the ME. But Reagan and Poppy Bush worked out a deal with the Ayatolla to hold off the release of the hostages until Inauguration Day. Cast Record Alive Voted 1980 Required to match recorded 1976 1976 1976 1980 1980 Turnout Mix Carter Reagan Anderson DNV - - - - 15.64 10.6% 39% 44% 17% Carter 45.56 40.83 43.29 40.69 40.69 47.0% 71% 22% 7% Ford 39.65 39.15 37.67 35.41 35.41 40.9% 11% 83% 6% Other 1.48 1.55 1.41 1.32 1.32 1.5% 44% 42% 14% Total 86.70 81.53 82.36 77.42 93.07 100% 42.66% 49.58% 7.76% Cast Recorded Total 39.71 46.14 7.22 Carter 52.56% 50.08% Record 40.99% 50.71% 8.30% Ford 45.73% 48.02% 86.58 35.48 43.90 7.19 1976 America wanted a straight-shooter in the White House as an antidote to the Nixon years. Cast Record Alive Voted 1976 Required to match recorded 1972 1972 1972 1976 1976 Turnout Mix Carter Ford Other DNV - - - - 10.11 6.1% 57% 40% 3% McGovern 34.44 28.17 32.72 30.76 30.76 37.7% 92% 7% 1% Nixon 48.90 47.17 46.46 43.67 43.67 53.6% 24% 74% 2% Other 2.42 2.40 2.30 2.16 2.16 2.7% 58% 39% 3% Total 85.77 77.74 81.48 76.59 86.70 100% 52.56% 45.73% 1.71% Cast Recorded Total 45.56 39.65 1.48 McGovern40.16% 36.24% Record 50.08% 48.02% 1.90% Nixon 57.02% 60.67% 81.53 40.83 39.15 1.55 1972 All those dirty tricks were unnecessary. But Rove learned from the master- Donald Segretti. 1968 Was it the silent majority or the 6 million uncounted votes? In 1968, Nixon won the official vote by 0.5m. Humphrey won the True Vote by 2 million. Cast Record Alive Voted 1972 Required to match recorded 1968 1968 1968 1972 1972 Turnout Mix McGovern Nixon Other DNV - - - - 16.75 11.2% 43% 53% 4% Humphrey 35.77 31.27 33.98 31.26 31.26 40.2% 71% 28% 1% Nixon 33.08 31.78 31.43 28.91 28.91 37.2% 6% 89% 5% Wallace 10.12 9.91 9.61 8.84 8.84 11.4% 40% 59% 1% Total 78.97 72.97 75.02 69.02 85.77 100% 40.16% 57.02% 2.82% Cast Recorded Total 34.44 48.90 2.42 Humphrey45.30% 42.86% Record 36.24% 60.67% 3.09% Nixon 41.89% 43.56% 77.74 28.17 47.17 2.40 |
Refresh | +4 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC