Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just Read "Next"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:02 PM
Original message
Just Read "Next"
by Michael Crichton and I honestly don't get what all the stink was about. The comments on bn.com and amazon gave me the impression that it was conservatism making a mockery of science but I got quite the opposite from reading the book.

First off the book is actually kind of dumb, but it's a quick read if you got a few hours to kill. The science in the book is ludicrous to begin with and the "fiction" tag on the side should be taken literally. At the end of the book Crichton spells out clearly what he believes in essay form. This prologue is obviously a response the criticism from his last book. Crichton states that he doesn't believe that companies should be able to patent the human genome. I agree. Crichton believes that a 1980's ruling that allows Universities to sell their state sponsored research to for-profit corporations should be over-turned. I agree. He makes several other points all of which I agree with and I simply didn't get why people were so upset with this book.

I also didn't get why so many people were upset with his last book "State of Fear." That book (like most of his recent works) was lame. The story was stupid and the science was so unbelievable I just decided to finish because I already read the first half.

I read once again reviews about how he is saying global-warming isn't real, again and again. I don't understand where these people got this. He may have been critical of the data that supported global warming, but he should be. This is one of the most grave scientific issues facing our future and we should not simply give any study released our blind support. Crichton, also in this book, states very clearly that while he may question global warming he doesn't question that something should be done about it. I agree with this too. We don't have to know that we are killing the world to be good guests while we are here.

I don't really know why I spent so much time defending an author that really isn't worth reading but I guess I have a soft spot for "eaters of the dead."
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I used to LOVE Crichton and I feel betrayed by him
He also wrote "The Andromeda Strain" and "Jurassic Park," among others. When I read "State of Fear," was horrified. It could have been written by a B*shit admin, neo-con, Nazi propagandist. I won't read anything else he writes, including "Next." It's such a shame that the filthy murdering B*shit regime has to poison EVERYTHING in American society, including its popular authors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was apparent he was in a real financial tightspot...
But hearing this, perhaps he has terminal writer's block. You're right too, at one time he was very creative, quite entertaining, and technically informed to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Your right he gets worse
and worse I read Prey too and that was just stupid. Somebody needs to take his Scientific American away before he gets any more hair brained ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. why were you horrified?
I read it and I didn't come to the same conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-01-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. the problem is
that all the wing nuts treated it like a scientific treatise. That idiot Inhoff even had him testify in front of congress. The book was bad...but the way it was treated was worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. He did cast one of his previous book's critics as a baby raper
with a tiny penis in this one, from what I've heard. That's just about as low-class as you can get.

I used to enjoy his books, but haven't even bothered to read his most recent ones, and have no further interest in his work. From what others have said about his last few books, I seriously wonder if he's beginning to develop dementia. Or maybe he's just run out of good ideas, and has found that demagogy pays better than quality writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC