Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader's New Book

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:42 AM
Original message
Ralph Nader's New Book
I just started reading his new novel, "Only the Super Rich Can Save Us." It's a VERY big book. Wanted to know if it is worth reading. There are so many books and so little time.:)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very clever
He gave us Bush so he could write a book about the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The US Supreme W. Court gave us the chimp..
Gore won Florida. The corrupt court stopped the vote counting.

Anyone who meets the requirements should be allowed to run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know.
I should have added the correct smilie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oops, sorry, I missed the sarcasm in your post ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The Supreme Court gave us Bush.
Thanks for continuing the lie that allows one of the country's most treasonable acts to go unchallenged.

From Vincent Bugliosi:

None Dare Call It Treason

In the December 12 ruling by the US Supreme Court handing the election to George Bush, the Court committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law


Nader, much as I'm sure he smiles at the power falsely attributed to him by people who seem to not want to expose the real perpetrators of that crime for some reason, had nothing to do with Bush's disastrous appointment to the presidency. Gore won that election, or did you forget?






Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck Nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Truthtellers are rarely popular in the political arena. If only he's stop
being so right about everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Really
was he right about things having to get worse before they get better.

Tell that to the 3000 dead American Soldiers and the thousands of dead Iraqis.

Fuck Nader!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. WTF?! Nader didn't invade Iraq.
According to what you posted, Nader was correct.

I guess we haven't bottomed out yet, so our re-hab will likely fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Tell it to the Supremes. Nader was against the illegal
invasion of Iraq and it was the Supremes who stole the election from Gore. Rewriting history doesn't change any of the facts surrounding that criminal decision to appoint a president.

I always wonder about those who tell the lie that Nader was responsible for a loss that never happened since Gore did win. What is the motive for attempting to exonerate the criminal, treasonous actions of the USSC? Why try to cover up that crime with this lame and ridiculous claim that a single man had the power to steal the election from Gore who actually won?

What is your interest in doing that? What was the interest of the US media in dropping this important historical event and the Dem Party who requested that we all 'move on' and forget the treason?

I'd love to know the answer to that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. !
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Onceuponalife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Go play with your buddy Rush Limbaugh
There's no cheerleaders in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ralph Nader = jackass
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. You can't handle the truth.
Everything Ralph says is spot on.

The only difference between the dems and the pukes is how quickly they get on their knees to serve their corporate masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. I Just Wanted to Know if the Book Was Any Good!
I'm sure there are plenty of authors I don't care for, but might like their storytelling! Or maybe not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lucas_g20 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. avoid imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. My dear abluelady, did you finish the book, and was it worth reading?
I can see that you got no real answer as to whether it was worth reading, and I am close to that book on my long list of "to read" books. So, what did you think?

And to the people who just don't like him, I don't care what you personally think of Nader or his opinions. Since this is supposed to be a novel, I am only interested in whether it is worth the read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I Didn't Read It
I was only interested in his as a worthwhile read, as you stated. I couldn't get into it. I try to give a book fifty pages, but I couldn't give this one even that small amount. Too many books, too little time. If you read it and do like it, please me know and I'll try again. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. who wrote it?
Edited on Sun Sep-26-10 10:31 PM by pitohui
if a book has a celeb's name on it, the celeb didn't write it

these days i am NOT gonna give my time and attention to "branded" stuff, every penny i give to a book by Famous Person (really ghost written by unknown person) is a dollar taken away from the chances of a new person being able to publish and tell a new story under a new name

i'll be honest, i didn't even known nader was still alive, but i'm not interesting in reading a book by some ghostwriter for a 90 year old...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Nader has Written Many Books
Can't imagine he didn't write this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. He's only 76. Where are you getting 90 year old?
And he's more than capable of writing his own books. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC