and he's angry (and was for a long time) with the notion that satellite's & telephone taps are enough when it comes to counterterrorism. His gripe with Clinton was one he has with US foreign policy historically -- namely the huge role oil companies play. Clinton came under the spotlight because of the specific examples Baer witness when he was stuck working at Langley. Baer's slammed Bush/Cheney very hard in the past four years for similar reasons & although I haven't seen it, I believe his take on US policy, oil & the Middle East is the backbone to
Syriana.
Regards Iraq - Baer's quite hawkish (though not particularly bomb-happy) about going after Islamic terrorism. He was on British TV quite a bit in 2002/3 arguing that a war against Iraq was idiotic because it did nothing about the terrorist problem and would only serve to exacerbate it. Back in the nineties - when he was still in the DO - he (& my memory is a little hazy) got somewhat duped by Ahmed Chalabi into helping a Kurdish push to Bagdad (in the belief that there was a key general who would lead an internal coup against Saddam). He had the impression that this was supported by the NSC (a couple of years later - per Scott Ritter - there was a coup plot(*) against Saddam authorised by Clinton) but the day of the launch he got a message from Anthony Lake (?) that Clinton didn't support this and wouldn't offer any assisstance. Baer ended up getting into shit with the Justice Department accused of plotting to assassinate a foreign leader (or something like that).
(*)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1579838,00.htmlI've always got the impression that Baer supported the coup ideologically, as it would benefit Iraq and the region. It was at a relatively peaceful time for America so it could spare the resources and in the long term it would be a hopefully democratic ally which would allow some divestment from Saudi Arabia. Baer's not a pacifist, but he is a very knowledgeable bloke who I generally find interesting and worth paying attention too (along with Ray McGovern, Mel Goodman, Robert Scheer & even Milt Bearden).
Sleeping With The Devil is basically a J'Accuse against the House of Sa'ud and the sheer hypocrisy of a USA which believes in freedom & democracy having as such a close ally (who would crumble without its custom) a theocratic human rights disaster zone. I wouldn't spend too much money on it, but if you see it cheap it's worth an evening's read.
I noticed you said you got this via audible. Out of interest, did it alert you to passages & words that the CIA had censored (which are represented by black bars in the book)?