Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trading with the enemy, WWII. C.Higgens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:01 AM
Original message
Trading with the enemy, WWII. C.Higgens
I now have a personal copy of this book.Trading with the Enemy: The Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949 by Charles Higham.Copyright 1983.quoting from preface "several members (business 'Fraternity') sought a continuing alliance of interests for the duration of World War II but supported the idea of a negotiated peace with Germany that would bar any reorganization of Europe along liberal lines. It would leave as its residue a police state that would place The Fraternity in postwar possesson of financial, industrial, and political autonomy. When it was clear that Germany was losing the war the businessmen became notably more 'loyal." Then, when war was over, the survivors pushed into Germany, protected their assets, restored Nazi friends to high office, helped provoke the Cold War, and insured the permanent future of The Fraternity. pp xv
"As for Roosevelt, the Sphinx still keeps his secrets. That supreme politician held all of the forces of collusion and betrayal in balance, publicly praising those executives whom he knew to be questionable. Before Pearl Harbor, he allowed such egregious executives as James D.Mooney of General Motors and William Rhodes Davis of the Davis Oil Company to enjoyu pleasant tete-a-tetes with Hitler and Goring, while maintaining a careful record of what they were doing. During the war, J.Edgar Hoover, Adolf A. Berle, Henry Morgenthau, and Harold Ickes kept the president fully advised of all internal and external transgressions. With great skill, he never let the executives concerned know that he was on to them. By using the corporate leaders for his own war purposes as dollar-a-year men, keeping an eye on them and allowing them to indulge, under license or not, in their internationall tradings, he at once made winning the war a certainty and kept the public from knowing what it should not know. pp xvii
I will reread this and the book-- Drawing the line: The American decision to divide Germany, 1944-1949 by Carolyn Woods Eisenberg (1996) to see how much of Higham's research she has picked up.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Churchill starts "iron curtain" thinking?

I will reread this and the book-- Drawing the line: The American decision to divide Germany, 1944-1949 by Carolyn Woods Eisenberg (1996) to see how much of Higham's research she has picked up.
I've started reading Eisenberg's book. Going slow.
Truman has just taken Rooselvelt's position as President. The troops are still frozen more or less as they were at the end of the war; the negotiating to draw back into the prescribed zones is starting. The first meeting of the ACC (Allied Control Council)took place on June 5, 1945. "(Harry) Hopkins cabled the White dHouse that he was "convinced" the failure to set a date for withdrawal into assigned zones would be 'misunderstood by Russia as well as at home' and was causing needless difficulties.
"This elicited a postive response from the White House. Ignoring new pleas from Churchill, Truman annouonced that the troops msut begin their withdrawal no later than June 21. The news came as a deep disappointment to the prime minister: "I view with profound misgivings the retreat of the American army to our line of occuupation in the central sectork thus bringing Soviet power into the heart of western Europe and the between us and everything to the eastward."
The war is still in the process of ending and Churchill is starting the Cold War narative. Am I missing something?
Higham is checking out quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. previous edited by software

"This elicited a positive response from the White House. Ignoring new pleas from Churchill, Truman announced that the troops must begin their withdrawal no later than June 21, The news came as a deep disappointment to the prime minister: "I view with profound misgivings the retreat of the American army to our line of occupation in the central sector, thus bringing Soviet power into the heart of western Europe and THE DESCENT OF THE IRON CURTAIN between us and everything to the eastward. page 78
The war is still in the process of ending and Churchill is starting the Cold War narrative. Am I missing something?
Higham is checking out quite well.
Another interesting point, page 52
"In northwest Germany, Eisenhower's armies were still reeling form the Wehrmacht's counteroffensive, and the Western Allies had called upon the Red Army to offer relief. Marshal Stalin promised to accelerate his winter plans This Soviet operation got under way on January 9, and by the MIDDLE of the month troops were streaming across Poland en route to the German border On January 29 Zhukov's forces crossed the 1938 Polish-German frontier into Brandenburg."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Books: Non-Fiction Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC