|
I've read a whole bunch of presidential and first lady history. I really enjoy it.
Let me say first thing that a man certainly can write a good, astute book about a woman. There, I said it. You don't see as many women writing biographies of men they have not met or known. The recent biography of Sandy Kofax is an interesting departure. But one day I looked at my case of biographies and two-thirds of the bios about women were written by men. The opposite pattern is much more rare.
But if there's one thing that reading about the Roosevelts has taught me, it's that men and women have a tendency to see things differently. And men are more likely to speak, write or be interviewed for the record. How many times have we read, say, that Eleanor "hated" sex? A lot. By male writers. Female writers note that seven pregnancies in ten years will do that to a girl. It's just an example in which the comments of both sides have validity, it's just that they see things differently. Marriages have two sides, so the Lincoln book might be a good one. Hard to say.
Now, heading from the top-rated first lady to the lowest-rated first lady...I've cruised the new Mary Lincoln biography and there doesn't seem to be that much that is compelling about her pre-White House life. Compared to ER, Lou Hoover, Florence Harding, Dolly Madison, etc., she seems like a slow read.
Have you read that book? If so, what do you think of it?
I will cruise this book.
|