Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former flight attendant sues Oprah over sex claim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:58 PM
Original message
Former flight attendant sues Oprah over sex claim
Source: Reuters

Oprah Winfrey has had pretty good luck in litigation during her career.

Back in 1998 she won a Texas defamation case brought by cattlemen who weren't thrilled when she said she'd sworn off burgers on a show about mad cow disease. This year she beat back a trillion-dollar lawsuit by a poet who claimed copyright infringement, and she recently filed an aggressive suit against marketers who claimed she put her stamp of approval on dietary supplements.

Now, a former flight attendant on Winfrey's private jet says she was fired after being accused of having sex during a flight in June, and she's filed a federal lawsuit against Winfrey's production company denying the allegations.

Corrine Gehrls alleges that flight attendant Myron Gooch and Winfrey's goddaughter, Kirby Bumpus, made false and defamatory accusations that led to her dismissal.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091012/people_nm/us_oprah_1
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. So?
If this is at-will employment, as is usually the case, the employer can fire even if the reason is wrong. The employer just can't fire for an illegal reason. That means Oprah should get out on summary judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. A slight correction
An employer can fire for ANY reason in a "right to work" state (right to work = euphemism for right to fire).

They can hand you a loaded gun and tell you to shoot someone and if you refused on the grounds that shotting people is illegal, they could fire you. They could demand that you drop your pants, bend over, and take it like a man and if you refused because you don't want to be cornholed today, thank you very much, they could fire you. That they could be charged with conspiracy to murder/conspiracy to cornhole is irrelevant. You would still be fired and would have no recourse regarding your job.

This is another republican/reagan legacy; the right to work legislation. Ain't America swell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm afraid you're confused about the meaning of "right to work"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law is a link defining right to work. It's essentially an anti-union statute.

At-will employment is the general rule on employment in the US, whether in a right to work state or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. What - Fired for joining the mile-high club?
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 03:15 PM by TheCoxwain
Totally unacceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why would she file in federal court?
Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Animator Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe it depends on what state she was flying over at the time of the incident...
Do labor law juristictions apply to airspace?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow I love all the self appointed lawyers in this case.
You know, Oprah (I think) can afford a real lawyer. And will probably get a good one (or firm). Folks, reading a paragraph somewhere does not a lawyer make you. I think you would have to go to a ... ah, what's that thing, ... oh yeah, a school?
It's a real disappointment to see that type of thing on this forum.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 23rd 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC