Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shutter Island: The Life of the Mind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 01:37 PM
Original message
Shutter Island: The Life of the Mind
Shutter Island: The Life of the Mind



It's always an event to see a new Scorsese movie in the theater for me. Whatever the story, whatever the subject, whatever the genre, Scorsese's command of the language of cinema usually ensures that the movie will have his inimitable stamp on it. Unfortunately, as many great things as Shutter Island has going for it, it just doesn't have that unique Scorsese stamp on it, and it suffers as a result.

The story is set in 1954 at a mental hospital located on an island in Boston Harbor. Federal Marshal Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) is investigating the disappearance of Rachel Solando, a patient institutionalized after murdering her children who escaped from her cell and, in the words of the head of Ashecliffe Hospital Dr. Cawley (Ben Kingsley), "We don't know how she got out of her room. It's as if she evaporated, straight through the walls".

Daniels has his hands full investigating this. In addition to the mysterious nature of the case, he is working with a new partner, Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo). Attempting to establish a bond, Daniels confides in Aule that he specifically requested the case on Shutter Island because one of the patients confined there was a gardener at his house years ago named Laeddis, who lit the lawn on fire which killed his wife. When not investigating the case, Daniels is haunted by visions of his dead wife, Dolores (Michele Williams). On top of all this there is a hurricane passing by Shutter Island that allows even more patients to escape their cells.

Through all of this, DiCaprio commands the screen in every scene he's in. From the first shot where he struggles with seasickness to the last stunned realization of what is happening, DiCaprio's intensity is what makes the movie compelling. It's almost as if he's making up for a lack of intensity on the part of Scorsese. The dark foreboding look of uncertainty and paranoia is there in Robert Richardson's excellent cinematography, but where there could have been cinematic moments of frenetic scariness, instead Scorsese went with long sweeping shots to perhaps try to capture the totality of gloom and dread there. As a result, there is a lack of energy that makes this picture evocative rather than provocative. It's scary looking without having a single scary moment.

more...

http://americanjudas.blogspot.com/2010/02/shutter-island-life-of-mind.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the trailers advertise it as a horror film. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Which is why I
had not planned on seeing it. Now I might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw it last weekend ...
... I'm still mindfucked. It was not at all what its advertised to be: you walk out wondering what is reality.
And that is genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh for crying out loud.
You can figure out the "surprise" by watching thirty seconds of the preview.

It's like a bad M. Night Shyamalan movie, and I haven't even seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Shyamalan. That's exactly the comparison I made.
But as a general rule, I never give away the ending of a movie in my reviews. Unless it's something like a documentary about John Lennon. SPOILER ALERT: HE GETS SHOT AND DIES AND MILLIONS MOURN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's what Shymalan aspires (and almost always fails) to be
It's much much better than any Shymalan film I've seen.

Of course much of that could be due to a real good cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I read the book many years ago, but I don't remember much about it,
so I'm looking forward to seeing it, either in theaters or on DVD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 23rd 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC