Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scarlett Johansson cast in 'lost' Stanley Kubrick film

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 01:46 PM
Original message
Scarlett Johansson cast in 'lost' Stanley Kubrick film
Among the discarded projects of the famously fastidious Stanley Kubrick are "lost" movies about Napoleon Bonaparte, the Holocaust and the American civil war. Now, 11 years after his death, a treatment by the legendary film-maker titled Lunatic at Large looks set to make it to the big screen, with Scarlett Johansson and Sam Rockwell attached to star.

Production Weekly broke the news on Twitter last night, reporting that the project is based on an original story by Kubrick and pulp writer Jim Thompson. The film-maker was set to shoot the movie in the early 1960s, but withdrew after being offered the chance to direct Roman epic Spartacus by its star, Kirk Douglas.

Thompson and Kubrick's work was completed in the late 50s, and the film is set in 1956 New York. It centres on an ex-carnival worker with serious anger-management issues and a nervous, attractive barfly he picks up.

The movie's central conceit is that the audience must try to work out which of the characters is an axe murderer escaped from an asylum. Kubrick's son-in-law, Philip Hobbs, unearthed the misplaced treatment in 1999 when rummaging through items from the late film-maker's estate. "I knew what it was right away," he told the New York Times. "Because I remember Stanley talking about Lunatic. He was always saying he wished he knew where it was, because it was such a great idea."

<snip>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/apr/14/scarlett-johansson-lost-stanley-kubrick

:thumbsup:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's sad that Kubrick won't be directing it
It would wind up being an entirely different effort than whatever the result will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stan was The Man.
Who's directing this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov 13th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC