A statement by Karl Barth, so-called neo-Orthodox theologian (so-called by his "liberal" critics). Here's a taste of what Barth was about:
http://www.ctlibrary.com/ch/2000/Issue65/5.23.htmlHe started out life conventionally enough: he was born in 1886 in Basel, Switzerland, the son of Fritz Barth (a professor of New Testament and early church history at Bern) and Anna Sartorius. He studied at the best universities: Bern, Berlin, Tübingen, and Marburg. At Berlin he sat under the famous liberals of the day (like historian Adolf Harnack), most of whom taught an optimistic Christianity that focused not so much on Jesus Christ and the Cross as the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.
After serving a Geneva church from 1909 to 1911, Barth was appointed to a working-class parish in Switzerland. In 1913 he married Nell Hoffman, a talented violinist (they eventually had one daughter and four sons).
As he pastored, he noted with alarm that not only was Switzerland's close neighbor, Germany, becoming increasingly militaristic, but his former professors there were fully supportive of the development. Dismayed with the moral weakness of liberal theology, Barth plunged into a study of the Bible, especially Paul's Epistle to the Romans, to see what insights it could offer. He also visited Moravian preacher Christoph Blumhardt and came away overwhelmingly convinced of the victorious reality of Christ's resurrection.
*********
By unbelief, I'm guessing he was not referring strictly to agnostics and atheists, but probably primarily to any rational skeptic, including "liberal Christians."
Nevertheless, I find the quote interesting considering the frequent discussions that take place in this forum over how believers and nonbelievers argue with one another. Or are we just preaching and being preached to?