Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Randi loses million dollar challenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:25 AM
Original message
James Randi loses million dollar challenge
Someone has discovered the contents of James Randi's safe using mental powers.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/cryptographer_s.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I won't comment on this particular challenge....
But I have long admired Randi for exposing charlatans.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The only charlatan Randi has "exposed" is himself n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. ? I don't think you comprehend what happened.
No paranormal powers were demonstrated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I comprehend what happened ... it was an encryption expert that revealed the contents
My point was to the OP referencing Randi's putative "exposure of frauds".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. So how does this episode
indicate Randi has exposed himself as a fraud? I guess I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. But not psychic mental powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The only reason Randi is admitting to the loss is because there's a physical "trail"
Otherwise, he'd do what he usually does -- stick his fingers in his ears and hum. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Are you saying that he hasn't exposed frauds?
By the boatload from what I've seen. I take it you're a firm believer is all things mystic? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's about the hyperreactivity I expect from a Randi admirer
>I take it you're a firm believer is all things mystic?

No, I'm an agnostic. I don't believe in anything, and that includes Randi's arrogant and obnoxious assertions
regarding things about which he knows nothing (chiefly, science). At least nuts like Sylvia Brown are only hurting
themselves. Randi makes black and white assertions about stuff any legitimate researcher would take an agnostic
approach toward (and admit a certain amount of wonder regarding). He also despises anyone who criticizes him.
He's basically a modern semi-science-based Cotton Mather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "At least nuts like Sylvia Brown are only hurting themselves."
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 09:46 AM by Boojatta
Question #1: What have been Sylvia Browne's sources of income?

Question #2: Would you say that card sharps hurt nobody but themselves?

Stipulative definition of "card sharp": a person who uses sleight of hand to cheat in such games as poker and who obtains by that practice alone an income sufficient to satisfy all of his or her needs and some of his or her wants.

The meaning of the term "card sharp" is open to discussion. However, I do not insist that the precise wording of question #2 is important. On the contrary, I am wondering about something and question #2 is simply an attempt to formulate some of the conceptual content associated with that experience of wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Your assumptions are myriad
Anyway, I don't get into this with Randi true believers. As I say to the Sylvia Brown true believers
(and Brown does apparently believe what she is doing herself), you believe what you need to
believe. I'm still stumped by the world. Stuff still surprises me. If you've already figured
everything out, then good for you.

I think there are more "right" people in the world than me and the people who think like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Is your concern solely about the number of assumptions that I have made
or are you also concerned that I have made assumptions that are extraordinary and therefore subject to immediate dismissal as implausible unless supported by authenticated information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. YOUR assumption is wrong.
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 12:21 PM by ClintonTyree
WHERE did I say anything about being an admirer of Randy? I said that he's exposed a boatload of frauds, and even you can't argue with that. He has. It seems you have some issues with him, probably well deserved. I don't believe in anyone's infallibility, which is why I'm an atheist. I don't believe in god, the devil, or any other entity in between.

I asked you a simple question and got an infantile tirade in return. Talk about hyperreactivity? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It wasn't infantile, merely direct and frank
You assume because I dislike Randi that I am "a believer in all things mystic". What isn't hyperreactive about that? lol If you think that was "infantile", you've clearly not been
around many adults who question your belief systems.

Listen, my friend, I mean no harm. I don't get into this with Randi admirers. It's as pointless as debating anything with the fans of big named psychics. You will think or not think as you deem
appropriate. I just posted a simple statement of opinion about Randi and you came after me with an
attack. You were primarily angry because I disagreed with you, it seems. lol

Have a good life. This ends the thread for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. An attack?
If asking an benign, honest question is an attack then I suppose I attacked you. :eyes:

Yeah, I'm such a BIG FAN of Randi I've been referring to him as "Randy". I only know what I've read about him exposing frauds like Benny Hinn, Ernest Angely and their ilk. Other than that I wouldn't know him from you. But you just CAN'T admit that he HAS uncovered countless frauds though because of your hate for him. :rofl:

And I'm ten years your senior, so I think I've probably been around a few more "adults" than you. :rofl:

You rail at "Randi" because he doesn't like to be told when he's wrong. Are we projecting a bit here, are we? :rofl:

Yeah, I'm done too. See 'ya in the funny papers. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malikstein Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. I guess not everybody here
is in the reality-based community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. What a great article--especially the link to the X files theme!
Now, that's the way to 'illustrate' a work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cryptography
The person referred to in the article is Matt Blaze, a prominent cryptographer. He discovered the contents of the safe by decrypting an "enciphered clue" left on Randi's website.

http://www.crypto.com/blog/psychic_cryptanalysis/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Shhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And it wasn't even encrypted...
just an old-fashioned brainteaser with the fancy name "commitment string."

Blaze is right-- Randi could do better than that if he tried a bit.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. So then the challenge wasn't lost, as it didn't involve paranormal powers - correct?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. Psychics are WEAK
Getting their butts kicked by a mathematician. What a bunch of fucking losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. For all that can be said about Randi, one thing is certain....
he has been a bane for charlatans.

I have no idea what some of the things I've seen and heard are, but there is an explanation, perhaps one I would not like, but there is always an explanation. For people to take advantage of the suffering, the indulgent and the ignorant is just not right.

If one of my dead relatives wishes to speak w/me, they don't need a "medium", I'm open to such conversation...and besides, I'm not sure I'd like what they would have to say...."You know, you were a lousy nephew, and you are still a bum."

Another thing that gets me is reincarnation...how come all of those that regress to a former life are always someone noble and brave? Seems to me the vast majority would be stableboys and charwomen, but no one wants to pay to find out they shoveled shit for 20 years before dying.

My advice, save your money and buy something you like or need...if Great Grandma wants to contact you from beyond the grave, she will...but be prepared for a message youmay not wish to hear...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. And another misleading headline from bananas...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yeah, gee, who woulda thunk it? n/t
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. "Matt Blaze: James Randi owes me a million dollars"
That's the title on Matt Blaze's blog entry, don't blame me!
They should have played a practical joke on Randi and not revealed how they did it. :evilgrin:

http://www.crypto.com/blog/psychic_cryptanalysis/

James Randi owes me a million dollars
How I discovered my psychic powers at the library

I've long been an admirer of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), tireless advocates for critical thinking, skepticism, and the scientific method. They offer a one million dollar prize to the first person who can provide convincing, testable proof of supernatural powers. The foundation recently set up a "remote viewing" challenge in which the purported psychic is asked to describe the contents of a special sealed box held at the JREF office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Those who know me may be surprised to read this, but I'm pleased to announce that Jutta Degener and I have successfully visualized the contents of Randi's challenge box. We accomplished this from over a thousand miles away and entirely through mental concentration and the application of our unique talents (or, I should say, gifts), and without any physical access or inside information. We can now reveal to the world the item in the box: a small mirrored flat circular wheel or disk, such as a DVD or CD. Randi, if you're reading this, a money order or certified check will be fine.

As you ponder the cosmic ramifications of the awesome, terrible powers that we apparently possess (we'll use them only for good, I promise), let me explain a bit more about the remote viewing challenge and how we accomplished this unprecedented paranormal feat.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'll blame you for the spin.
Being a cryptographer, he's pointing out the weakness in Randi's setup of the challenge and his clue. It's a good thing he's honest, because a liar could have collected the money by keeping their mouth shut. But there is no *real* defeat of the challenge, because no remote viewing or "supernatural" abilities were used to determine the contents. But since you despise Randi and skeptics, your spin is expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. I don't hate James Randi or skeptics
Does he believe in Global Warming,
or is he a Global Warming skeptic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Right, because being a "skeptic" means you deny everything.
Uh-huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. No, a denier says it's not true, a skeptic is more agnostic.
Is he a believer, skeptic, or denier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Why is this relevant?
Randi's thing is investigation of paranormal claims. Since climatologists don't claim paranormal causes for anthropogenic global warming, Randi's opinion on it, whatever that may be, isn't of much interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. Science triumped where "magic" failed, once again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. He's lucky those guys are honest.
He really left himself wide open on this. Someone less scrupulous may have claimed the million and forever after the incident would be pointed to as "proof" of psychic powers.
That "commitment string" was nothing more than a brain teaser begging to be cracked by some clever person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC