Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santeria Priest's Suit Highlights Religious, Cultural Clashes (Some religions more equal than others

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:50 PM
Original message
Santeria Priest's Suit Highlights Religious, Cultural Clashes (Some religions more equal than others
Last Edited: Saturday, 24 Mar 2007, 2:55 PM CDT
Created: Saturday, 24 Mar 2007, 2:55 PM CDT

By ANABELLE GARAY
Associated Press Writer
EULESS, Texas -- On many Sunday mornings Jose Merced watches police officers directing traffic into and from overflowing church parking lots and realizes his own religion doesn't evoke the same acceptance.

When police came to his home on a quiet cul-de-sac in this Fort Worth suburb last summer, it was to demand that Merced -- an Oba, or Santeria priest -- call off a religious ceremony planned for the next day.

The reason: the city's ban on animal slaughter.

Merced explained that the ritual sacrifice of an animal is necessary to initiate a new priest into the Santeria faith. He also offered a copy of a Supreme Court ruling allowing such sacrifices for religious reasons.

But Euless officials insisted that local sanitation ordinances prohibit the slaughter of animals inside city limits.

<snip>

In some places, authorities have worked to accommodate religious practices brought by new residents. Other times, participants have met with opposition, said Jeremy Gunn, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief.

More:
http://www.kristv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6273974

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Also hard to have a sweatlodge in city limits
some friends of ours in Ft. Worth had to disguise it as "smoker", complete with pipe, so the neighbors wouldn't complain. What was funny was the couple were vegetarians!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, but my god is bigger than your god, blah, blah, blah.
I want their kids to join the high school football team. After scoring a touchdown, instead of kneeling down and crossing himself, which we see all the time, the player pulls a chicken out of his jersey and sacrifices it in the end zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think we'll see more of this
as people of different cultures and belief systems live closer to one another. Should make for interesting discussions at city council meetings--after all, if one religion is allowed to practice, doesn't that mean all should be allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. While I think that this religion is fine, perhaps the hypothetical
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 04:11 AM by Random_Australian
'punch-random-people-in-the-head' religion goes a little far. :)

Sorry for this ramble; I was thinking about people trying to make other things legal by claiming it's their religious belief. Discrimination against gay people springs to mind. :mad:

But yes, we need to strive to make all religious views equal in the eyes of the law. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. there are religions and there are religions
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 06:43 AM by ayeshahaqqiqa
I remember reading about some inmates at a prison who insisted they were following their "new" religion, which consisted of smoking cigars and eating steak! And about ten years ago here in Arkansas, Our Church tried to say they had the right to smoke marijuana as a religious rite. But one thing these so-called churches had in common was their agenda didn't appear to have spirituality first and foremost on their agenda.

Santeria, on the other hand, has connections to spirituality and also a historical record. This fellow didn't just invent the relgion the day before yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyborg_jim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Respecting beliefs? HAHAHA.
Plenty of you theists talk about it but the reality of following it through all the way makes you uncomfortable doesn't it?

But one thing these so-called churches had in common was their agenda didn't appear to have spirituality first and foremost on their agenda.


Too bad you can't prove that.

This fellow didn't just invent the relgion the day before yesterday.


Yes, because we all know that the older a religion is the more true it is right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You're missing the point.
It's not that "older religions are more true," it's that the religion was likely adopted insincerely in order to claim rights under the Free Exercise clause, as opposed to a sincere belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyborg_jim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're missing the point.
You can't tell the insincere belief form the sincere one based on the content of that belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Actually, in some cases you can.
Was the belief adopted recently in response to some sort of restriction on the behavior in question?

Sure, you can't prove with certainty that the belief is insincere, but you can make a reasonable determination for the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Uncomfortable about respecting beliefs?
No, I don't think so. I respect your right to not have a belief in a supreme being. Your life experiences are different than mine, and have led you to that conclusion. Another person's life experience has led them to voodoo or Mormanism or Buddhism or ...but you get the idea. Why should I be uncomfortable with another's belief system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Now now, people pull religions out of their backsides all of the time
How do you think Scientology and Mormonism got their starts? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. God forbid someone watches a chicken being slaughtered
Quite possibly one of the most ironic reasons for infringing on someone's First Amendment right to free exercise in a land swimming in Tyson boneless chicken byproducts encased in corn starch and deep freed in trans fats. Sanitation? Have you actually bitten into a McNugget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Super Size Me claims they use the whole chicken; McDonalds replies
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 04:14 AM by Random_Australian
that they use only 100% salted rotten potatoes.

(lifted and modified from a chaser article)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why do these local governments never talk to their lawyers?
Seriously... this is why you have general counsel: so they can smack you across the head and say "No. Bad executive."

There is a Supreme Court case EXACTLY on point here. There's no way the town can win. So what the hell were they thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. They were thinking?
Basically it comes down to, "Those devil-worshipping heathen are not going to practice their vile rituals in OUR town! We are a GOD-FEARING CHRISTIAN town!" :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Fair point.
It's just a bit of professional bitterness on my part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC