Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikipedia Islam Entry Is Criticized

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:01 AM
Original message
Wikipedia Islam Entry Is Criticized
An article about the Prophet Muhammad in the English-language Wikipedia has become the subject of an online protest in the last few weeks because of its representations of Muhammad, taken from medieval manuscripts.

In addition to numerous e-mail messages sent to Wikipedia.org, an online petition cites a prohibition in Islam on images of people.

The petition has more than 80,000 “signatures,” though many who submitted them to ThePetitionSite.com, remained anonymous.

“We have been noticing a lot more similar sounding, similar looking e-mails beginning mid-January,” said Jay Walsh, a spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco, which administers the various online encyclopedias in more than 250 languages.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/books/05wiki.html?_r=2&ex=1360126800&en=ebab932c6d8d4bdb&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

_______________________

Hey, let's encourage them to spread Islamic law worldwide!!! (not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. if islamic people don't like it, nobody else can do it either. ok, thanks nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyborg_jim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That is how people of that mindset think
They are, after all, "right".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. These are pre-existing images.
Since these images of Muhammad already exist, and this is merely a reproduction of them, I don't see the problem. The images appear to exist in Islamic literature. Are these complaints completely arbitrary? Or, is there actually a basis in the Islamic religion for these complaints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You underestimate the sheer power of anal retentiveness.
Fuck them.

By the way, the paintings are from the Middle Ages, a time where Islam was FAR more tolerant than it is today. Jews and "wrong" Christians often fled Europe for the Arab countries in order to be able to live free. That influx of intelligent people actually helped the Islamic nations gain power. Amazing, innit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Man
So should the Jewish population complain because the word "God" is there. Should I have used "G-d"? I mean, OK, I get it. Muslims don't want representations of their prophet. I wouldn't go into the home of a muslim and bring in those representations. I would respect them. But I'm not muslim. I can look at them if I want. Just like I can use the name of God if I want to.

Get over yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC