Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Islam in space

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:33 PM
Original message
Islam in space
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 04:38 PM by TechBear_Seattle
This is for a "future history" I'm writing for a science fiction novel. I mean no disrespect. My question is: if Mars was colonized largely by conservative Muslims, how (if at all) would Islam change?

In 2052, the Muslim world erupts into the "Great Jihad" (Arabic?), basically a civil war with religious conservatives on one side and moderates and progressives on the other. This is exclusively a Muslim affair; when other parties try to join in, the two sides join together to "disinvite" the intruder. While the moderate and progressive factions are larger and better organized, the conservative factions are better funded and have the fanaticism of true faith on their side. The war grinds on in a bloody and destructive stalemate.

In late 2054, the Sultan of Oman brokers a peace; the Treaty of Mecca is signed with much ceremony on Eid al-Fitr (the festival day that marks the end of Ramadan) on April 27, 2055. As part of this peace, the conservative factions agreed to emigrate to Mars, there to establish a society more in agreement with their worldview. The Migration of the Exiles (Arabic?) began a year latter.

(In the 2020s, as the world's oil supply noticeably started to fall, the Sultanate of Oman began investing its considerable wealth into other technologies, including solar and nuclear power and improved structural materials. These were then used to construct the first permanent research outposts on the Moon in 2033 and on Mars in 2041.)

Life on Mars requires a number of changes. The most immediate issue was the requirement to face Mecca when praying. The Old Mosque in Al-Merrikh was designed as a round room with 19 lights placed equidistant around the wall; a computer program tracked the relative position of the Earth and turned on the corresponding light. When prayer was called, worshippers would orient towards the light, thereby facing Earth and Mecca. Other early mosques followed this pattern. Latter, the Sultan of Arabia (the Saudi Kingdom fell in the Great Jihad) sent a block of stone from the Kaaba, which had been damaged in the war, to be a "piece of Mecca" on Mars. The Green Mosque was built in Al-Merrikh to house the stone, and religious scholars decided that facing it was sufficient. Al-Merrikh was renamed New Mecca (Arabic?) and most mosques built since then were built to orient towards there.

The second issue was the calendar. The decision was made to hold to Earth reckoning, using Mecca as the reference point. Since the Islamic calendar is about 354 days long and the Martian year is about 780 days, holy days occur two, sometimes even three times every Martian year. To keep the days in synch, all settlements on Mars keep a 24 day, again using Mecca as a reference. A separate calendar of sols tracks Mars' slightly longer days.

The third major change involved the Hajj. It is mandatory for every Muslim who is able to make a pilgrimage to Mecca and perform certain rites. Because of the extreme cost of round-trip transit between Mars and Earth, and the problems of someone born and raised in Mars' 1/3 g trying to perform those rites in Earth's gravity, Martian Muslims are exempted and may instead make a gift of money and sponsor the Hajj of someone Earthside. In addition, all Martian Muslims are encouraged to visit the Green Mosque in New Mecca during Dhu al-Hijjah, the month of the Hajj, at least once every Martian year.

That is the essence of how I see Islam in my future history. I have tried to be respectful; if I've not succeeded, please let me know gently. As for the rest of Martian history, the lack of abundant natural resources led to a renaissance of Muslim science: nanotech and medicine flourished, and structural materials engineered by Martian researchers are still in use today, almost 250 years latter. In 2114, 26 of Mars' 28 colony settlements banded together to create the Republic of Al-Mirrikh; a short lived cold-war with Earth led to the creation of the Union of Planets, which would eventually include Earth, Mars, Luna, the Gallilean Republic (the sattelites of Jupiter) and humanity's two fully established extra-solar colony worlds, Aurora and Wu Wei.

Ok, so any suggestions, criticisms, fatwas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. How does the rest of the world fare? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The Great Jihad occured at one of the real low points of human history
In the late 2020s, efforts to remove carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and methane from the atmosphere led to a burgeoning surplus of elemental carbon, and entire technologies were developed to use it when possible. One early development was "fucarb" or fused carbon: carbon powder was mixed with other chemicals and fused into bricks, which were used in place of clay bricks in building. Latter, various forms of spun and crystalized carbon were developed, and carbon became the construction material of choice for just about every possible item. Other technologies led to the development of synthetic food and petroleum. In 2093, "cold" fusion became a reality. By the dawn of the 22nd century, many of today's problems had been addressed.

That isn't to say, of course, that the utopia of Gene Roddenberry's Federation had come into existence. There were still armed conflicts, political disunity, fascism, greed, inequity, bigotry, etc. But with global temperatures returning to what has been norm for most of human history, and without pressures for food, clean water and abundant energy, things did get a bit better for most of earth's population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. About the Hajj...
how about a holo-hajj..?

Worshipers beam their likeness to (Mecca, Earth) to partake in each particular ritual...

Also, I can just imagine some great book covers with bedouin in the red desrt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Holo-hajj?
Nice idea, but I think not. Imagine the long distance rates, especially when the Earth and Mars are on opposite sides of the sun. :hi:

I got the idea from Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars series. I think he was seriously optimistic that many people would emmigrate just to "stay close to the desert"; our history shows that typically, only adventurers seeking profit and religious extremists seeking converts and freedom willingly head to such untamed, uncivilized lands. But I think it all turns out well in the end. And, I don't know if I will even use this; right now I'm just filling in backstory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good point...
the bandwidth would be pretty expensive (and transmission unreliable) over millions of miles, I didn't think about that.

I just had a visual image of ghostly Star Wars-like holograms among the throngs circling the Kaaba...
maybe housebound Terrans would use that kind of technology. That's probably an idea for the movie version anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very interesting idea, you a Dune fan?
Some questions:

1. What is the position of women at the Martian colony? Are they staying in their traditional roles or are their roles expanding because a survival society needs all the brain power it can find?

2. Education? The Qur'an isn't sufficient for a society that must rely on science to survive.

3. What resources, if any, are available for the colony to pay its way? The Muslim nations on Earth will support for awhile, but not indefinitely.

4. Is Mars their's alone or may others settle?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I loved the first book, rather liked Herbert's other books
And don't you dare get me started on what his son has done with Frank Herbert's notes.

To answer your questions:

1. At first, many of the colonists tried to keep women in their traditional roles. But as with women who migrated to the US western frontier, there were too many jobs and too few hands to keep those roles in place. In the time of my stories, around 2320, the status and power of women has become much elevated, even honored, among Martian Muslims, which has led to strident religious arguments with conservative Muslims that did not emigrate, who who emigrated latter.

2. As with the status of women, the status of education was forced to radically change, for one simple reason: there are no suras instructing the faithful on how to build and maintain atmospheric scrubbers, water recyclers and hydroponics facilities. Survival required a strong education in highly technical fields, which helped to spark the renaissance of Muslim science I mentioned above.

3. The Sultan of Oman and his immediate successor put most of the Sultanate's considerable fortune towards this enterprise. Many Muslim groups helped as well, some out of a sense of brotherhood and some (sadly) out of a sense of "good riddance." Religious scholars held that the obligation of the zakat could be met by giving money to any of the groups promoting Martian emigration. Also, the Departure of the Exiles saw a brief revival of bonded servitute, where individuals and even whole families sold themselves into service for a period of time (typically between 5 and 10 years) in exchange for passage and a place in the Martian settlements. Technically illegal by national, international and religious law, the practice continued for almost a century.

4. When the Departure began, there were three permanent settlements on Mars, all scientific research outposts. Al-Merrikh (the Arabic name for Mars) was owned by a conglomerate of investors, with the Sultanate of Oman as the chief stockholder; it was here that the first wave of emigrants arrived.

When the Republic of Al-Merrikh was proclaimed, there were 28 fully established settlements, and four others in various stages of construction. Most of these had been built by Muslims and were, as you would expect, populated almost exclusively by exiles. Of the two that did not vote for union, one was controlled by a group who felt that Martian Islam was not "pure" enough and wished to remain separate; the other was one of the original research outposts that wanted to remain apolitical. All of the settlements had significant minorities of non-Muslims; again, the rigors of colonial life on a harsh planet forced most of the purists to modify their attitudes and to accept "infidels" among them.

In the two and a half centuries since, the number of (known) settlements has expanded to 102. All of these are subject to Al-Merrikh law which retains elements of Sharia. Some of these settlements, however, are designated as "secular" and thus exempt from many aspects of religious law. While largely populated by non-Muslims, more and more Islamic Martians have been moving to them, seeking to escape rules they see as outdated. Several settlements have also begun agitating for secular status, and the threat of another religious war is visible on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sounds fascinating, TechBear
Lots of potential conflict (always necessary for a good story) from the deeply personal to shoot 'em ups.

Have you given any thought to point of view?

Re Dune. Everyone should have called it quits with God Emperor of Dune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. A few suggestions
First of all, "jihad" means "struggle", not war, and in Muslim terminology the Greater Jihad is the struggle one has with one's own ego ("nafs"). I don't think a Muslim would term the war you described as the "Great Jihad" because of this. It would more likely have a title like "The War of the Righteous" or something like that. I think your concept of the warring parties joining together to ward off an outside source intriguing, and something that could happen if the parties felt that their right to worship was being threatened. An interesting side note that might help with drama of the sub-plot: Sufi Orders are international in scope, and as we are mostly very liberal, it is not unusual for us to have people of other faiths closely aligned to our Orders. This is one reason Sufis are often persecuted in places like Iran.

OK, you know that the Kasbah houses a stone (which some say is a meteorite) that is what Muslims are praying to and which they circle when they go on Pilgrimage. I don't know its exact size, but I know it is small enough that a group of men could lift it with a cloth and slide it back into place, an event that happened in Mohammad's time. The stone, it is said, was erected as an altar by Abraham and Ishmael after they returned from the mystery schools of Egypt where they learned of the One God. The rest of the Kaabah building was built around it. So I would say that if the conservatives got a bit of the Kaabha stone, it wouldn't be--couldn't be--very large.

Hajj is a requirement only for those who can afford it, as you said. Your idea of Martian Muslims sponsoring Hajj for someone earthbound makes sense, as it would involve giving charity to another, which is one of the Five Pillars of Islam.

Actually, your book sounds quite intriguing. I wish you all success with it, and hope my observations prove helpful to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I chose the phrase "Great Jihad" for a reason
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 06:02 PM by TechBear_Seattle
I am familiar with the use of jihad to mean the struggle to submit to Allah's will, or as you describe it, the struggle with one's ego. But the war, at its heart, was a struggle over Islam's ego and the future direction of Dar al-Islam: Would it hold onto traditional values and practices, or would it advance into a more modern understanding?

As for the Kaaba, I was referring to the huge cubical building that houses the Black Stone (the Ruknu l-Aswad.) It was damaged -- but not destroyed -- during the war. The Black Stone remains in Mecca; the block sent to Mars was one of the stones of the building replaced during repairs to the Kaaba.

Right now, I am putting this together as background. However, I have blocked out a trilogy that covers 1) the Jihad (or whatever the war ends up getting called), 2) the early colony period and 3) the establishment of the Republic. I may end up writing that first, as the story is much better developed that the story I had started to write.

And you raised something I had not yet considered, about where the Sufi orders stood during the war. That could make for an interesting story right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I wonder though - would the conservatives be likely to be the ones
willing to leave? I would think they'd be the group more likely to feel tied to tradition, including traditional places.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. if they think like the puritans did, most likely, I imagine nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow. Sounds like a great idea and outline you've got there
As a person addicted to this sort of stuff, I'd definitely want to read it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think you might have a problem there.
I don't know if the conservatives would agree to leave earth (Mecca etc.). You might want to consider having the progressive factions leave instead. Or have some ultra conservatives that still fight on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not all, of course, but most
Some will refuse because they refuse to leave the earth, and some do not leave because they are too old or too sick or too poor to make the journey. Many do, however, out of the promise of a purely Muslim society away from the "taint" of non-Islamic values. With the help of a few charismatic religious leaders....

As I said, at no point in my future history do I see a humanist utopia similar to the one visioned by Gene Roddenberry. Give me some credit. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I understand.
I just see it as unlikely that the conservative group would be the ones willing to go. It sounds like they might require the other better funded and organized group to help get them there. And it seems like they would be unlikely to make such a journey without some scriptural basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Migration:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhajir

"Muhajir" shows up as a nom de guerre from time to time.

"Jihad" is a squirrelly term. Just as "struggle" can be of diverse kinds, so can "jihad". The US was in a struggle against the Nazis in WWII and recovering alcoholics are in a struggle to kick the booze. Which is the "true" meaning of "struggle"--the violent kind that included Dresden or the kind that involves trying to overcome an inner defect? Right. Most Muslims privilege one definition over the other ("greater jihad" vs. "lesser jihad") while not denying that both old; some greatly privilege one over the other and discount any notion of the lesser jihad; others even deny that one of the definitions is possible, denying ahadith that others accept and interpretations that have been around for over a millennium. This is not an argument built on linguistics or even history, but one made to mould perceptions and avoid certain decisions, and often serves as a way to displace takfiir from the speaker to the listener. ("There is no 'jihad' meaning military struggle in Islam." "So that means you don't consider the Taliban to be Muslims?" "You said that, not me.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. I don't have any suggestions...but it would be funny if you had mars hit with a meteorite
that created another black stone. Or white stone that turns black. Or something. Might make their ties to Mars stronger.

Yeah...I would pretty much make a shitty SF writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC