Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

95 THESES ON THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 04:58 PM
Original message
95 THESES ON THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT
95 THESES ON THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT

Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light
In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said "love thy neighbor", willed that believers should show *compassion* toward others.

2. This word cannot be understood to mean mere lip service ("I love them, but I hate their sin"), but genuine concern for the welfare of others.

3. Yet the Religious Right has forsaken compassion for a doctrine of institutionalized hatred and violence.

4. Specifically, the Religious Right has taken the Word of God and wrapped it in the flag of Right Wing Politics, replacing God's message of redemption for the entire world with a narrow message endorsing right wing American politics.

5. Item: the Religious Right has neglected the teachings of Jesus in the gospel of Luke, where He instructs that we are to show compassion for the poor.

6. In place of God's words, the Religious Right has substituted a right wing political doctrine in which the poor have only themselves and their alleged laziness and moral weakness to blame.

7. For example, the Religious Right has rejected the needs of poor children of unwed mothers.

8. The Religious Right has rejected the cries for help from the children of impoverished families in the inner cities.

9. The Religious Right, has advocated fewer resources for the elderly poor and for the millions of children now living in poverty.

10. In place of giving to the poor, the Religious Right has advocated political doctrines specifically designed so that
individuals may acquire vast sums of money.

11. The Religious Right has thus seized on a contemporary economic ideology as an excuse to ignore the teachings of Jesus.

12. Item: the Religious Right has ignored God's injunction that we are to be caretakers for the Earth.

13. In place of God's injunction, the Religious Right has advocated policies in which the natural resources of God's creation are stripped from the earth and given to wealthy corporations without replacement.

14. In place of God's injunction that we are to be caretakers for the creatures of His creation, they have advocated policies through which these creatures may be extinguished forever.

15. The Religious Right has rejected laws designed to protect God's creation from pollution, claiming the "rights" of property owners are to be paramount.

16. In each case they have ignored the message of the Bible that this is God's creation, and they have substituted a doctrine in which God's creation may be partitioned and sold to the highest bidder.

17. Again, God's message has been cast aside for a message that supports a narrow economic message with its roots in right wing American politics.

18. Item: the Religious Right has neglected the teachings of Jesus that "he who is without sin should cast the first stone."

19. In place of God's words, the Religious Right has substituted a doctrine in which perceived sinners are to be persecuted.

20. Gays, for example, are persecuted because of their alleged sins. In some cases, leaders of the Religious Right have encouraged acts of physical violence against gays.

21. While the Religious Right has been eager to persecute others for their alleged sins, they have been blind to their own.

22. While the Bible counsels that a rich man can no more enter the Kingdom of Heaven than a camel can pass through the eye of a needle, many in the Religious Right have celebrated the acquisition of wealth.

23. While the Bible enjoins us against pride, the Religious Right appears to be flush with pride in it's holier than thou stance.

24. While the Bible asks that we be slow to anger, the Religious Right is quick to anger -- indeed it appears to revel in anger and in fanning the flames of anger in others.

25. While the Bible counsels that we are not to be "revilers," key members of the religious right have consistently and aggressively reviled their political enemies as well as those who are perceived to be sinners.

26. It seems then, that the Religious Right picks its sins selectively, ignoring the clear Biblical message against avarice, pride, and anger, and emphasizing selected “sins” that have little to no Biblical basis.

27. Item: While the Bible counsels that we are not to bear false witness, the Religious Right has engaged in smear campaigns against numerous political foes, often telling outright lies about “liberal” political leaders.

28. Worse yet, these smear campaigns have often been carried out in the house of God, sometimes in the form of inserts in church bulletins, and sometimes directly from the pulpit.

29. But the Religious Right has not merely spread its lies within the Church; they have done so outside the Church as well.

30. The Religious Right has used its financial resources not to spread the word of God, but to spread lies in the populace.

31. Item: Religious Right has failed to see that God's call to help our neighbors also extends to our international neighbors.

32. International aggression is not a Christian doctrine.

33. Where the Bible calls us to be peacemakers, the Religious Right claims that we have no business trying to bring peace to troubled areas but rather counsels that we should use military might to secure our business interests.

34. Where the Bible, through the story of the good Samaritan, instructs that we are to help our international neighbors -- indeed, even our enemies -- the Religious Right counsels "America First".

35. But "America First" cannot be a true Christian Doctrine.

36. The Bible gives no special status to political entities like the United States of America, and any suggestion to the contrary is to simply lie about the content of the Bible.

37. God does not bless nation states, and if He did, He surely would not bless them for practicing international internal intolerance, and propping up corrupt kingdoms and military juntas that traffic in institutionalized poverty and violence.

38. Item: the Religious Right has claimed that abortion is immoral, yet there is no Biblical basis for this claim

39. Rather, the doctrine appears to be driven by a medieval philosophy of the person, which they have imported into their theology.

40. Why has medieval philosophy taken precedence over the Scriptures? Perhaps the Religious Right never took the Scriptures very seriously in the first place.

41. This is highlighted by the frightening extremes to which they have taken this political dogma.

42. Victims of rape and incest are not to be allowed abortions. What could the Biblical basis of this possibly be?

43. Even when the mother's life is in danger, they would reject the possibility of abortion. Thus once again God's message of love and redemption is tarnished by advocates of a political doctrine of hatred and cruelty.

44. More troubling than their anti-abortion doctrine, however, is the tone with which that doctrine is advanced.

45. Here they use they weapon of hatred, encouraging the harassment of women, the bombing of clinics, and in some cases the taking of human life.

46. Their rejoinder that abortion is the taking of a human life has no basis in Biblical authority.

47. Their anti-abortion campaign is merely a political campaign dressed in the clothing of religion.

48. Item: The Religious Right has failed to distinguish its political message from what is left of its genuine religious message, leading Christians to conflate the two.

49. The Religious Right has engaged in a form of idolatry -- idolatry of certain patriotic symbols.

50. They have wrapped the Bible in the American flag. Indeed, one can find Bibles that contain documents such as the United States Constitution and pictures of the presidents.

51. Such Bibles arguably defile the word of God.

52. The American flag is not a symbol to be worshipped; yet the Religious Right has argued that it should be a crime to "desecrate" the flag. But what religious basis is there for such advocacy?

53. What basis is there for putting the American flag in the front of a church, next to the altar and the cross?

54. There can be no Biblical basis for placing such symbols in the house of God, nor for the undue reverence paid to them.

55. The Religious Right has failed to grasp the full power of God, supposing that spiritual growth for Christians can only come in the wake of political change in the United States.

56. On the contrary, God is perfectly capable of creating spiritual revival without the help of the Republican Party, and certainly without the help of an organizations that espouse doctrines that are antithetical to the teaching of God
at almost every turn.

57. Item: the Religious Right has preyed on people's fears -- their fear of crime, of other races, of the future, of the unknown.

58. Rather than say "fear not, for God is with us," they have used fear to sow the seeds of hatred and violence.

59. They have led their congregations to fear people of other races.

60. They have led their congregations to fear people of other sexual orientations.

61. They have led their congregations to fear our own judicial system.

62. They have led their congregations to fear the teachings of science.

63. They have led their congregations to fear anyone and anything different from their narrow conception of what they consider to be normal.

64. Worse, they have fanned this fear into hatred, encouraging their congregations to despise those who are different.

65. Item: The Religious Right has paid lipservice to the moral development of children, yet their doctrines are antithetical to the interests of children.

66. They appear to believe that moral development can be accomplished solely through discipline and censorship --
censorship of thought-provoking materials and censorship of the findings of science.

67. Yet, as a group, the members of the Religious Right have failed miserably as parents.

68. Jesus said, "suffer the children come unto me," yet members of the Religious Right have physically and psychologically abused their children.

69. They have advocated corporeal punishment, and have carried out acts of indoctrination on their children which, truth be known, are as severe as those of any fringe religious cult.

70. They have made children to be ashamed of and hate their bodies, when they should be proud that those bodies are the temples of God.

71. They have lied to children about the nature of God's creation, teaching them to ignore the great beauty God has revealed through the biological sciences.

72. In place of that beauty, they have taught their children a theory in which God's revelation through nature is ignored, and an ugly doctrine of fiat creation is espoused.

73. They have taught their children to be intolerant of others, to be hateful of gays and persons of color.

74. They have failed to instruct their children in God's message of love and redemption and have substituted for it a message of exclusion, suspicion, and contempt.

75. They have failed to raise their children according to the teachings of the Bible.

76. They have utterly failed as parents, yet they presume to dictate how we should raise our own children.

77. Item: The Religious Right, caught up in its hypocritical attacks on others has utterly ignored the solteriolocial aspects of Christianity.

78. Gone is the message that Jesus dies on the cross to save us from our sins.

79. Gone is the message of salvation, of hope and redemption.

80. In effect, the one core fact of Christianity, it's very reason for being, has been lost in the Religious Right's orgy of hatred and accusation.

81. How many souls will be lost because of their campaign of hatred?

82. At what price do these political triumphs come? Are they really worth the loss of the core message of Christianity?

83. Item: the Religious Right pays lip service to the authority of the Word of God, yet that Word plays little role in the treating of the Religious Right.

84. In place of the message of God's Grace and our redemption, they have substituted a purely political doctrine with no grounding in the Scriptures.

85. Rare are the references to passages of the Bible in the sermons of the Religious Right.

86. Those references that survive, are taken out of context and are merely used to justify preestablished political doctrines.

87. For example, there is no Biblical support for their views on abortion.

88. There is no Biblical support for their right wing economic theories.

89. There is no Biblical support for their campaign of abuse against their own children.

90. There is no Biblical support for their "America First" doctrines.

91. There is no Biblical support for their treatment of persons of color.

92. There is no Biblical support for their treatment of homosexuals.

93. In conclusion: the Religious Right has desecrated the house of God, taking a place of worship and treating it as a soap box in the service or the Right Wing of the Republican Party.

94. The Religious Right has likewise desecrated the Word of God, attributing to the Bible doctrines that are hateful, cruel, and entirely antithetical to the actual contents of the Bible.

95. Christians are to be exhorted to speak out against the Religious Right, as it is a vile heretical movement, wholly outside the teachings of the Word of God.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agnostic here...
My main complaint with the Religious Right is that, according to the Bible, God put us here and gave us free will. In other words, it was his choice to give us choice. We are free to follow his words, or not. I have a real problem with people forcing their views, opinions and "moral" judgment on others.

The Religious Right has no right to take away the free will God gave us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Not only that, but we have the intelligence to separate fact from fiction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Well, you see, the problem is...
that if you've rejected god, then it MUST be because you didn't hear his word in the *RIGHT* way, and so they will try again and again and again, and FORCE you if necessary, because it's for your own good, you see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. WOW! Very well said. I'm going to bookmark this one.
Did you write this yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I need to get my eyes checked ...
.... I thought it said "95 FECES on the religious right."

(Which would be OK with me) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Being "Born Again" doesn't entitle anyone to twice as many rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well written
with many thoughtful points.

It might also be said that the core teachings of Jesus are echoed in the teachings of other faiths, including Islam. God is called the Merciful and Compassionate at the beginning of every chapter in the Qur'an save one (Bismillah er Rahman, er Rahim). The Qu'ran says we should treat all people with compassion, especially orphans.

Like Christianity, there are people who are using the words of Islam, but not the heart of the teachings of Islam, to further their own ends.

You can find True Believers in every faith, but they are not the brash, they are not the ones who concentrate on amassing wealth in this world. They quietly do the Work, looking not for a reward here, for they know what the True Reward is and where it is to be found.

Salaam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. The Qur'an is just as laughable as the Bible....
though, unlike the Bible, at least the author of the Qur'an is abundantly clear. Talk about your self serving document.

8:1 They ask thee (O Muhammad) of the spoils of war. Say: The spoils of war belong to Allah and the messenger, so keep your duty to Allah, and adjust the matter of your difference, and obey Allah and His messenger, if ye are (true) believers.

"the messenger" is Muhammad, of course. Writing the document to glorify and enrich himself, of course.

4:14 And whoso disobeyeth Allah and His messenger and transgresseth His limits, He will make him enter Fire, where he will dwell for ever; his will be a shameful doom.

Read any of these documents with an open eye, mind, and in context and they are easily seen for what they are. Works of man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Strong Stuff!!!
Perhaps you'll like my latest sign, that I hold in our street-corner gatherings:

Saudis/OBL = Pilate,
BushCo = Herod,
ALL Innocent Dead = Jesus,
You = ?

Hare Krsna! Hare Rama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did you say theses or feces??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. THESES, you moran. It's too hard to nail feces to the church door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. can i staple ...i mean paste them to your forehead?
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 10:39 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Stellar..... I am in awe.
W/your OK I would like to send this one out to a few people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. And it says- LOVE THEY ENEMY.
Of them all, this is the single most difficult thing.

I hate my neighbor. There is nothing I can do to ignore the fact that he's cutting down every tree on his property. It also happens to be my front yard.

I don't think people know what these things mean. Why does it say love they enemy? Is it for the enemy, or for me? Or both? People spend lifetimes thinking about things like this. By hating my neighbor, I still end up treeless. But I'm also treeless and angry. We're only human. How can we not hate?

Just after the towers were down, my father was the first man to say- forgive. That word could have had you killed, if you lived in a redneck town. The pastor in my town came by to look at the graveyard I have on my property a half a year ago. He was praising what was going on in Iraq. I'll never attend his church.

My opinion is that the fraction of people who "get" what the bible is all about is very very small. And some people who don't know the bible at all are the best Christians of all. I can't recite verses. But I know what was in the heart of Jesus. It was very simple. It cannot be mistaken. It was self evident.

Sometimes I feel that the act of saying "I don't know" is the most Christian act of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. MLK, Jr. addressed this very thing in one of his speeches
He was saying that "Love your enemeies" doesn't mean "Like your enemies." I think what he meant was that you don't have to even try to pretend you have warm & fuzzy feelings for some people, and they may even make you sick to think about them. But you don't return hate for the hate they may be flinging at you. You don't destroy or decimate them, but you can try to stop them from hating and/or doing evil and hurtful things. The evil they do should not cause you to become evil yourself.

I think the other point of this is to challenge us to be like Jesus was. He loved his enemies as they wished him dead and as he was dying ("Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do"). I don't think we would be human if we didn't have feelings of hatred & disgust, but ultimately I think this means that we should get beyond the business of hating. We don't have to do the work of those who hate us to "love" them, but ultimately we are to act radically towards them.

Agreed - not an easy thing to do at all, especially since we witness so many crimes against humanity perpetuated by this administration. I'm seething with rage at them as we speak and I need help not hating them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thank you.
I have spent a lot of time in my life talking with my father about "love they enemy". And I have to say that your reply helped me understand it just that much more. You hit it on the head.

(I wish for the rage in your life to not be overwhelming. I think like the money changers in the temple, Bush and his friends are not liked by God. That alone can help you with rage. The way people are feeling now, I've felt for thirty years. That's a hell of a long time. Some of us got it early. Between DU, the Daily Show, and knowing it will end soon, I survive. )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. These are of course great, but...
There are very "logical" (from a fundie standpoint) reasons why each of them is invalid.

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said "love thy neighbor", willed that believers should show *compassion* toward others.

Well, that's one interpretation. And compassion to them means helping people to become self-sufficient, not just giving them things. It also means helping them overcome their sins. (See #2.)

7. For example, the Religious Right has rejected the needs of poor children of unwed mothers.

No, they haven't, they will tell you. By fighting to get welfare benefits tied to being married, they are working to bring the father back into the family into his "rightful" role as head of the household, as God is the head of the church.

And so on, and so on. Because the bible is so easily interpreted in different ways, the radical right can find plenty of justification for their own spin on it. You may argue that they're wrong, but you really have no way to prove that, because it's all a matter of interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Bingo. There is no point arguing bible interpretation with anyone.......
Whatever you want it to say, it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC