|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
![]() |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:51 PM Original message |
On Fundies, Christianity and DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. I try to reserve my negative comments to the fundies - of any religion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Realize that it is not religion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
81. You're among many people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #81 |
86. While very influential, they are not the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Between 40 and 50% of ALL Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I do the math and they are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 08:32 AM Response to Reply #90 |
105. So what is your justification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #105 |
127. My friend, the atheists' position, if there is one, is not being helped by you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #127 |
152. Facts don't need "help". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onager
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #152 |
193. The atheist position = the missionary position, with Stalin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 09:38 AM Response to Reply #193 |
197. When we were little.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. What is a fundy? I am assuming you mean "fundamentalist," but what is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It is number three and having met and dealt with a few |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
45. There are also fundamentalist atheists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Sure, becuase urbandictionary is accurate in any way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Deleted message |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Ugh. THIS nonsense again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mariana
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #52 |
63. I'm sure it was just an oversight. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Those who not only hold strong beliefs about their behavior, but feel the need to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. I try to stay out of these conversations but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. another online definition that more closely says how I use the word... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. It is #3 - which refers to dems, repugs, etc - I have found more fundies here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Fundies, to me, are the biblical literalists, who literally believe that every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Trust me their Jewish counterparts are just as bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 09:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
34. self delete. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
58. Jews are not fundamentalists, unless they are Christianized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:50 PM Response to Reply #58 |
74. When I think fundamentalist Jews, I picture the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #74 |
85. Or my all time favorite since I got to be on the sharp end of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:28 PM Response to Reply #74 |
93. Jews not immune to authoritarianism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
83. You should visit a Chabad house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #83 |
92. American Jews are not the only atheists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:36 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. What you have observed is the division between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. i usually pay no attention to those.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Well as nominally a Jew I don't either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Re-read the OP please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I think they do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Hang around here for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. OK but what about my initial response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. My apologies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:10 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Accepted.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
40. I guess I take issue with the "minority" label. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. Eloquently said. Fanatics of any color, stripe, origin, faith, etc...are dangerous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I got to say my first contact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 09:44 AM Response to Reply #13 |
35. Thanks for that link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
205. Are you sure that is the reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
14. "Fundy," I like it. Fundies deny science. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. And for the record, our era will be known as ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Thank you. Sometimes it can feel very threatening for anyone to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Well it bothers me that there is a little bullying, to put it midly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
82. And please, not the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:55 PM Response to Reply #82 |
162. Yes you represent what you stand for quite well and most assuredly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Believer privilege at work. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. "You guys" ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Follow the dotted line that connects his post to the parent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Follow along here if you can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. Oh, yeah, and btw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
53. Must be hard being 90% of the population and in charge of everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
21. As long as they keep their cartoon beliefs out of government...I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. So let me ask you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Believing in a deity is one thing. Believing that said deity is working through you to govern me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. And that is a real small but loud minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:51 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. "cartoon beliefs"? What do you mean. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
29. K & R from a Pagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
98. I think you have it about right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:30 AM Response to Original message |
30. K&R: Tolerance is a good thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mr blur
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
31. "Moderates" just make it possible for fundies to exist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 04:08 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. My fellow Tom Verlaine fan, it's really not that simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 06:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. So where does tolerance of others fit into your worldview? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #33 |
117. "Tolerance" ends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. I will offer to you two free clues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
61. ^ Good clues, too ^ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #61 |
79. I am more than just a fan of the Power of Myth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #38 |
99. Note though that all religions have proscriptions for heretics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
36. 76% of people in the US are Christian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. Only 16% believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. So Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Dennis Kucinich, Ted Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Howard Dean, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
70. Red Herring Fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:45 AM Response to Reply #70 |
126. Definitely not a red herring, but a necessary straw man and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. Straw men are logical fallacies and therefore never necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 04:53 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. They're absolutely necessary for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Always such constructive replies. And yes there are times when strawmen are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. It's from a page that opens with: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #136 |
138. I don't think he's the only one who uses that site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #136 |
151. This is the source. One of several. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #151 |
155. That's the same site I linked to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #155 |
160. Perfectly legitimate scholarly website. It just makes you look incompetent, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #160 |
163. That's quite a loose definition of "scholarly website." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #163 |
168. The man's Curriculum Vitae would indicate that you really are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #168 |
171. Where in his CV does it mention his degree in philosophy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 11:05 PM Response to Reply #171 |
175. A degree in philosophy is hardly a requirement for scholarly debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #175 |
176. Whose argument am I evading? It certainly isn't yours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #176 |
177. Don't look now but you just did it again. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:14 AM Response to Reply #177 |
178. Do you know what "nt" means? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #178 |
179. In this case I think here it means nice try, but you are out of touch with the real world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 02:23 AM Response to Reply #179 |
181. Sigh...more of the same fallacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 03:31 AM Response to Reply #181 |
182. I think the only criteria was christians, period. And that thing you call the big lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #182 |
189. Well, since it's been refuted by that criteria, I expect you'll be admitting error any minute now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #189 |
191. Well, since you stumbled a couple times to finally identify the proper criteria |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #191 |
192. I accept your apology. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 03:38 AM Response to Reply #192 |
194. Great dodge. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 02:03 AM Response to Reply #178 |
180. I think at this point it might be best not to feed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #180 |
187. He wants more rope, and I'm a generous person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #134 |
142. Ha ha ha ha ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #142 |
145. Well, I would say that further justifies my assertion. Actually, in debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. Only for those who cannot defend their points any other way, as admitted even on that site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 01:34 AM Response to Reply #145 |
147. Just like how taking steroids is a useful and acceptable method of winning athletic competitions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #147 |
149. Now that is most definitely a straw man fallacy, however when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #149 |
154. You are absolutely wrong. Here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #154 |
159. Way to rationalize, but what you refer to as "dishonest tactics" are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #159 |
173. Wrong, and wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #159 |
190. BOOKMARKING!!!!! Priceless quotes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #190 |
201. The quotes also haven't a thing to do with the subject referenced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #201 |
210. Hahahahahaha! Nice try, but no cigar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'll try to remember that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:37 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. In principle most do actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
46. We're not them, we're better! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:08 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. So Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Dennis Kucinich, Ted Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Howard Dean, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Your overused fallacy deserves only one response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. That's a great smilie. But one of the following two statements has to be true, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. FYI, you totally missed the point of ds3's post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:37 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. Sorry, my mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. So I guess you are just choosing to miss the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. I only have one response to avoid tough questions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I'm sure Jesus is proud of you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
97. Oh, no, you've painted me into a corner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:15 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Would you consider casting your vote for a neo-fundie in a presidential election? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:41 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. I would ask: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #101 |
114. I would say: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. A simple "no" would have sufficed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
54. Moderates perpetuate and legitimize the blithering nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
66. This atheist rec's this. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. This Buddhist rec's this also. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
67. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quarbis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
68. Christians or christians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quarbis
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. I am a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. No True Scotsman in 68 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
72. I don't care if you want to believe in magic or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. And I can name those with the fingers of ONE hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. And how many more Republicans than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Far from the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:06 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I said NOTHING about Americans in general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Well in the course of human events |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:42 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. That's some serious weaksauce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 08:38 AM Response to Reply #91 |
106. Since you seem determined to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #80 |
95. Gay marriage ban? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #80 |
109. ONE hand? Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atypical Liberal
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 05:45 PM Response to Reply #80 |
118. Nice qualifier there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
102. I've started..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 01:27 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. And I will tell you this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 04:16 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. I'm not an atheist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #104 |
111. So what is the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #111 |
120. You said nothing about "confronting" anyone in your original post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal316
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #102 |
108. That quote proves Harris is a moron..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. And because you say it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #110 |
128. is this what you truly mean to say SS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. When it is based |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. ok gotcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 02:06 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Try a little thought experiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #131 |
139. ok, I don't gotcha... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. Yes, I do admit that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. Well, if it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:31 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. I believe reality has dualistic properties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #143 |
156. Of course, what most people refuse to admit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #156 |
164. I freely admit it is a possibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:29 PM Response to Reply #156 |
202. And what you need to admit is that you really have no objective basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #202 |
203. Deleted message |
humblebum
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:54 PM Response to Reply #203 |
206. "Can't be physically sensed"- I think we have been here before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaoriMitsubishi
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
107. Do moderate christians really deserve a break? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #107 |
112. Do moderate anything deserve a break? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #107 |
121. Excellent video. TY n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 10:39 PM Response to Reply #107 |
122. Do moderate atheists deserve a break? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkstar3
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 12:20 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. And what dogmas do these dogmatic atheists adhere to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. More than that, whose rights are offended by the lack of a faith? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #122 |
137. What dogma is that? I hear a lot of accusations like that but never can get anyone to spell it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #137 |
144. I can offer an answer but I think you wont/dont like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #144 |
148. You speak of "God" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #148 |
150. I think that you nailed it. Alec is a fundamental atheist! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #150 |
153. Is that the same as a militant atheist or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #153 |
157. Still puzzling over the difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humblebum
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #157 |
161. ????? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #161 |
169. Your reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #150 |
166. I am!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:38 AM Response to Reply #166 |
183. Hehe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #183 |
185. yes that is accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #185 |
199. What does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #199 |
200. you mean this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:31 PM Response to Reply #148 |
165. you raise a good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #165 |
170. Which cleverly dodges the real question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #170 |
172. you give me too much credit SS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #172 |
188. Which STILL leaves the question unanswered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 07:44 AM Response to Reply #188 |
195. see post 185 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 10:57 PM Response to Reply #195 |
204. Nice dodge, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #204 |
208. what are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 10:29 PM Response to Reply #165 |
174. There's a great quote about that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #174 |
184. Perfect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
113. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skepticscott
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. And how few are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
119. Where I live they are all fundies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Sat Jan-08-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. Where I am very few Christians are fundies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laconicsax
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #123 |
158. To both of you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 02:44 AM Response to Reply #158 |
207. Yes, it does depend on where you live, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Wed Jan-12-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
167. I have been posting to this thread for some time now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Thu Jan-13-11 12:28 PM Response to Reply #167 |
186. You make a good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 08:01 AM Response to Reply #186 |
196. I do stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Fri Jan-14-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #196 |
198. Then I applaud your efforts. Where are the rest of those that think like you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlecBGreen
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #198 |
209. There is firm pushback CH but its not sexy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie
![]() |
Sat Jan-15-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #209 |
211. I cannot disagree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC