The comment (
source)
That prompted an op-ed by Shelley Fisher Fishkin (linked to in Haven’s post) defending the book and decrying censorship. One day later, Haven added another post that included this comment by poet
Sam Gwynn <my link - Jim>:
“Frankly, I just can’t teach it any longer. I know it’s great, and I can lecture for a day or so about how Twain is being faithful to the dialects and to the way that people spoke back then. But trying to lecture about its literary merits takes a back seat when I see how African American students (I’m talking about teenage sophomores, taking the class for core credit) are reacting to the iterations of THAT WORD. The problem is that Twain doesn’t distinguish between those who are using the word in a ‘kindly’ manner (we could probably assume that this is the only word for black people that Huck has ever heard) and those who are using it an an epithet. Used indiscriminately in these ways, it just makes everyone in a classroom uncomfortable. Maybe if I were a better (or younger) teacher I could use this book to challenge all kinds of assumptions about language and art. I just don’t find myself up to the fight anymore, at least at the sophomore level. I think this is a pretty good 2/3 of a novel, but I really wonder why it has become canonized as the GAN.”
Haven adds this note on GAN: “That’s the Great American Novel for the uninitiated.”
In this case, they're removing the book from the 6th grade curriculum - and leaving it in "older grades" - not specified. I think we're all against banning books. However, I do think there is such a thing as "age appropriate" books, especially books that are part of the curriculum. Since this book was banned from the 6th grade, the real question is, is this ban "age appropriate?"