Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Review: 'Immortals'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:50 PM
Original message
Review: 'Immortals'
“The ideas and themes at play in Immortals are unique and compelling enough to overcome many of the film’s obvious other flaws.”

By William BibbianiNovember 10, 2011

Immortals is a big, beautiful, sumptuous mess that I absolutely adore. It’s awkwardly plotted and thoroughly overblown, and yet I will defend it to the death in spite of those things because it’s not really a “movie” in any traditional sense. It runs at 24 frames per second and is playing at your local movie house, and yes, it tells a story featuring big time Hollywood actors, but Immortals is more of a pageant than anything else. There’s no other way to explain all the silly hats. And pageants don’t need to be coherent to do their job right.

Yes, Immortals gives unto you a procession of crazy hats. Big metal Mohawks that are the enemy of doors everywhere, bizarre seashell contraptions that make Kellan Lutz look like he’s playing “dress up” with his little baby sister (who is apparently a metallurgist), and weird lamprey eel-type cowls that wrap themselves around Mickey Rourke’s head, and have bunny ears. Every single one of them earns a smattering of applause upon their first appearance. In fact, most of the strange visual stylings of Tarsem Singh are worthy of applause in Immortals. Mostly for the right reasons.

What Tarsem Singh has done – we’ll get to the plot in a minute, hang on – is create a primer for every future 3D movie to follow. Singh gets it. He knows how to shoot a movie that takes advantage of 3D in a way that naysayers like myself can’t deny. He bathes his sets in light, compensating for the dimness of the glasses, and keeps his camera locked down tight, only gliding it along at a misty pace when necessary. Immortals never screws with your brain by cutting between a variety of depths. From a photographic standpoint, it’s almost subdued. Perhaps that’s why he overcompensated with outlandish production design and narrative bombast.

About that bombast: Immortals tells the story of Theseus (future Superman Henry Cavill), who has been secretly groomed since birth by Zeus himself to be a great leader of men. The irony is that Theseus has become a dyed-in-the-wool atheist, but that’s not important right away. What’s important is that King Hyperion (Mickey Rourke) has come a-conquering with his army of masked lunatics, seeking an ancient relic called “The Epirus Bow,” which is basically the world’s first bazooka, thousands of years before they were supposed to be invented. With the Epirus Bow, Hyperion will be able to free The Titans – the rival gods who were imprisoned by the popular Greek pantheon – and take over or possibly destroy the world, depending on who’s describing the plot at any given moment.

http://www.craveonline.com/film/reviews/177895-review-immortals
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just watched a trailer for this
I really hope the full movie is a LOT better then the trailer.

http://the-w.com/the-immortals
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I had zero interest in seeing this until I read the review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. aw, it's just a ripoff of Ben Jonson's masques
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kurmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Theseus has become a dyed-in-the-wool atheist" Hope they realize he's a fictional character, right?
Edited on Fri Nov-11-11 05:36 AM by Kurmudgeon
Projecting a little, aren't they...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theseus
"Theseus /ˈθiːsiːəs/ (Greek: Θησεύς Greek: ) was the mythical<1> founder-king of Athens, son of Aethra, and fathered by Aegeus and Poseidon"
See that word, "mythical"?
Theseus has became nothing, he never existed. He only says the words the writers put in his mouth.

I'm sure some will say that all religion is just like this...ho hum..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC