Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bideford Town Council prayers challenged at High Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 06:47 PM
Original message
Bideford Town Council prayers challenged at High Court
Saying prayers before local council meetings is to be challenged in the High Court.

30 November 2011 Last updated at 13:55 ET

The National Secular Society (NSS), will argue Bideford Town Council's "archaic" ritual is "inappropriate" and a breach of human rights.

It said the Devon council should be "a secular environment concerned with civic business".

No-one from the town council was available to comment on the case, which will be heard on Friday.

But in August last year, George McLaughlan - the then town council clerk - told BBC News the council would defend the case and contest the NSS's claims.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-15973327
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. And here is a nasty article in the Daily Hate-Mail by the vile George Pitcher
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2069074/The-secular-attack-Bideford-aims-destroy-national-faith.html

I have to admit that until I read this, I thought that the NSS were picking on a rather trivial issue - who really cares about Bideford Council's archaic rituals considering that on Nov. 30th there was a big public sector employees' strike, and that the Chancellor had just made a big speech announcing ever more cuts as the British economy continued to go down the tube? But Pitcher's article made me feel a bit more hard-line on the matter. I know that the cliches are that 'a conservative is a liberal who got mugged' while 'a liberal is a conservative who was sacked as a result of spending cuts'. I would add to that, that sometimes a 'New Atheist' is an old-fashioned tolerant atheist or agnostic, who got a bit too much exposure to the hateful rhetoric and sometimes actions of right-wing anti-secularists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "...they can instead establish their authoritarian, godless and uniformly secular republic."
Christianity is woven into the fabric of our nation and its values, through our history, reflected in our institutions, from parliament to our legislature to marriage and family.

The NSS would do away with all this, including the Act of Settlement and the 27 Lords Spiritual, our most senior bishops, who sit in the House of Lords, so that these secularists can try to pass nasty laws to introduce euthanasia and abolish the Royal Family, so they can instead establish their authoritarian, godless and uniformly secular republic.


Where have I heard that before?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Abolishing the Royal Family is considered euthanasia?
Who would have known? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think just an unfortunate juxtaposition of two of Pitcher's obsessions...
But has interesting implications! Did you Yankees know that you've all been dead since 1776?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. More :
NSS lawyers argue council members of no religion are being indirectly discriminated against without justification, which it claims is unlawful.

They contend the council's insistence on prayers being said breaches articles 9 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect an individual's right to freedom of conscience and not to face discrimination.

NSS president Terry Sanderson said religious prayer in a multi-faith society had the "potential for conflict".

He cited a case in Portsmouth earlier this year when a councillor walked out of a council meeting because an imam had been asked to deliver an opening prayer.


And the atheists are the bad guys. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC