(Note, I use
apologist in the academic sense.)
We know where Hill Cumorah is, where Mormon witnessed the great battle wherein the darker skinned "native Americans" (the Lamanites) slaughtered the last remaining True Believers (the Nephites) around 400 CE. It is just outside Palmyra, New York, where the LDS Church has bought the land and set up a kind of "meditation garden" around the hill where Joseph Smith claims to have found the golden plates hidden there centuries before by Mormon. I know it is there because I have been there, and read the memorial plaque placed there by the church, and stood on the very hill itself.
Why has no serious archaeology
ever been done around Hill Cumorah? There was a vast battle within viewing distance; an entire people disappeared in genocide because of that battle. We have the remains of many older battles in Europe, Africa and Asia; places where swords were broken and cast aside, bits of armor and bridles and shoes that got lost or were cast away, chariots lose wheels, spears and arrows are cast and never recovered. Then there are the archaeological treasures of the army camps themselves: even a few days will leave evidence of fire pits and trash dumps and middens that lasts for many centuries. But, for some reason, all of the LDS' sponsored archaeology has focused on central and south America, completely ignoring a vast treasure-trove of proof for the Book of Mormon literally on land the Church now owns.
Why is that, do you suppose? I would think evidence of a large battle 1400 years ago -- a battle that, according to the Book of Mormon, used iron weapons, plate armor and chariots -- would do far, far more to bolster Mormon claims than some vague, weathered carvings in the jungles of Bolivia. And yet, for some reason....