|
Just giving this a little kick until someone more theologically knowledgeable comes along. My background is Mythology.
Seriously, you've hit on one of Christianity's longest-running internal arguments.
Humans are supposed to have free will -- it's what makes us humans, not animals. Animals have no free will, just instincts that drive them -- they are what they are, and their actions cannot be considered good or evil, just a matter of survival. (I think that's a bit reductive; some of the animal kingdom are more sentient than others. But then I'm not exactly a Christian any more.) The innocence of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden was the innocence of animals until they ate of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, woke up and became human.
Humans can choose our behavior and beliefs, and can rationalize what we do. Humans can choose good or evil actions. We are less than the angels, but greater than animals. We have immortal souls in mortal bodies -- when we die, the soul goes on. (This figures into fairy-tales -- the fairy-folk are immortal, but have no souls. They are said to envy us for that.)
I am not clear about the nature of angels (whose name means "messenger"), but Lucifer was not the only one who disobeyed God; he seems to have had a small army of followers who joined him in the attempt to overthrow God. They lost the battle and were thrown out of Heaven -- they are "fallen angels" because they fell from Heaven. I think this must imply that angels, who are immortal beings, have free will as we do. Lucifer's name, btw, means "Light Bearer" and he was supposed to have been kind of a favorite before he rebelled. Hell was the absence of God's presence.
As to the argument over our free will-- one problem as I understand it comes from those sects (like the Calvinists) who believe that only a few people are destined for Heaven. God has decided who they are before they are even born (i.e. they are predestined), but no one else knows. Everyone else is predestined for Hell. Everyone is supposed to believe the Creed/Credo, pray, try to do everything right, and yet believe it may not affect the outcome.
Calvinism is actually a pretty cruel world-view. Infants are born into a state of sin ("In Adam's fall, we sinnéd all") and if they have the bad luck to die before they can be baptized their little souls go to Hell too. This belief has to have been very hard on the Puritan mothers. Throughout Christian history there have been various doctrinal contortions attempting to mitigate this awful fate; it's one of the reasons "limbo" was invented, a place neither Heaven nor Hell.
Christian theology is vaster than Calvinism and far more complex than I can do credit here. On the whole salvation seems to come down on the side of (1) belief, and then (2) somewhere between grace and good works. Popular American Christian beliefs today are fairly scrambled, possibly even heretical, but that’s another story. But it is always focused on the world-to-come.
Christians are supposed to subscribe to a particular set of beliefs and state them publicly (the aforementioned Credo, which starts: I believe in God, the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ his only son, our Lord, who . . ." etc, etc). That’s the reason fundies in the US keep going on about their personal relationship with Jesus.
Jews, on the other hand, don’t go around talking about their relationship with God. They are supposed to ACT a certain way. There are around 600 separate commandments (mitzvot) if one is Orthodox; fewer that are considered necessary if one is Conservative or Reform. But it all comes down to how one behaves in this world. Quite obviously, free will is an essential component.
I like that, frankly, because between "grace" and "good works" I always come down on the side of good works, because that is something a person actually has control over. To me, "grace" is like a butterfly that comes unbidden, but doing good is always within our grasp.
That’s all I have to contribute.
Hekate
|