Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Congress shall make no law..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:39 PM
Original message
"Congress shall make no law..."
While listening to NPR's All Things Considered yesterday on the drive home, I heard this story about a woman whose husband, a National Guardsman, died in Iraq. He has been laid to rest at a veterans' cemetary near Reno, but his monument does not bear the symbol of their religion: Wicca.

At issue apparently is the fact that the Pentagon doesn't recognize this as a "real" religion, though according to the story atheism has its own symbol, as does Eckankar and some 36 other faiths.

Here's the part that baffles me: how is this not "establishing" an official military religious framework? If I die in the service of my country, how is it any of the Pentagon's business whether I claim to worship Jesus or Allah or rocks shaped like feet or nothing at all? On what possible valid basis does the State make a law respecting the establishment of religion in this regard?

Those who've read my posts here know that I'm atheist, but I can still bitch about religious discrimination, even if it doesn't affect me directly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apparantly our current gov't. chooses to ignore Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. The real issue is...
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 03:46 PM by TechBear_Seattle
regulations about what sorts of monuments, etc. can be put in a national cemetary. It would not do, for example, if a swastika or the logo of the World Church of the Creator was set up in what is essentially a national park.

There has been foot-dragging in getting the pentacle approved, yes, and that is reprehensible. But the problem is the foot-dragging, not the process for getting symbols approved for use on tombstones and other monuments in the national cemetaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Which came first?
The swastika as a "religious" symbol predates the fish and the crossed lines by many centuries. It's often found among ancient Sanskrit symbols. Source Why would it not be allowed in any cemetary? The mythical Indian deities are as every bit real as any others.


Eileen


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Regardless of its older history, the swastika has become a Nazi symbol
... And in the minds of most Americans and Europeans, remains very firmly associated with Nazi atrocities and Nazi ideology. Those religious traditions wherein the swastika is a symbol of good luck and prosperity have other, less tainted symbols to convey the same idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The crossed lines symbol has a similar meaning
in many parts of the middle east and other places where it is used by those who destroy culture.

I don't see any big move to have it deamonized.

Perhaps those too ignorant to have anything other than a knee jerk reaction should better learn that the swastika symbol was co-opted for an evil purpose - just as the crossed lines has been frequently.


Eileen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's problemattic
There are many many religious each with their own symbol - some 36 faiths are represented, including my own and Atheism - those cover the bulk of our society - but what should be done about those outside that framework? How many symbols would be enough?

Plus, I don't know a lot about wicca, but i have the impression that there are a number of symbols that might be selected as significant? Does Wicca have one symobl that everybody who is Wiccan would want?

I see two solutions

1. No religious symbols on headstones.

2. The army hires a stone cutter, or, more reasonablly, subcontracts out to one - when they get a religion outside the 36, those who survive the deceased provide the army with a symbol they would like. The army reviews it for appropriateness, then sends it on to the stonecutting firm, who does a headstone up.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColdWarVet Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. How many...
pentagrams at Arlington?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Welcome to DU, ColdWarVet!
:hi:

I've no idea, but when I was trying to Google some background on this issue, I found several entries in various online discussion forums wherein the poster insisted that Wicca and Satanism are both recognized by the military. However, this is in direct conflict with yesterday's NPR story.

Additionally, I would bet that with a super-righteous Servant of God in the Whitehouse, there's no way that our Holy Military would recognize Satanism as a valid faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHeart Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. As an atheist also
I would rather see no symbols on any of the monuments. For that matter get rid of the momuments all together. There is no reason to cry over the rotting flesh of a deseased person. If you loved that person cherish his memory not his body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I see your point
I wouldn't begrudge anyone else the right to grieve over the physical vessel, though. Still, that's a far cry from letting the State say what is and what is not a real religion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Makes sense
but death customs aren't so easily dispatched of. When we lose someone, we tend to reach out for customs. They can comfort. For example, I've always been "against" such "barbaric" customs such as embalming. But when my parents died, those hours I spent with their embalmed bodies were sacred and precious and I hated when I had to leave. My dad, particularly so, because when he died he was in advanced dementia. But the undertaker brought him "back" to us, with his dignity, for at least a while. And that awful way he looked in his last days was gone forever.

Then we burned them both up.

T-Grannie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHeart Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Nothing barbaric about embalming
it's just useless. I understand that people grieve differently, but a dead body is just a shell, your loved one isn't there.

A common comment at funerals "Doesn't he look good?" I want to respond "yeah he sure does, too bad he's dead". When I go I want to look like crap. I want to wring the last drop of life out of my body before I go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. See, I would agree with you
On the surface, it does seem rather odd that people talk over the corpses of loved ones. I mean, if they are in heaven or whatever, they can hear you wherever you talk to them. Going to a graveyard doesnt mean they can hear you extra well.

However, I can't begrudge other people doing it. I have literally never been into a graveyard or had someone very close to me die. I have never had to mourn anyboy (Im 26). So what do I know about it...nothing. Until it happens to me, I don't know how I would react.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about the sex all the time religion.
Some guys in a prison belong to it, and so they must have conjugal visits with young women regularly. After all, it's their religion.

I wonder if their religious symbol would be considered pornographic. How would that look on a headstone?

Would you want to take your children there?

What does constitute a religion?

I'm really just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Religion defined!
What does constitute a religion?

I'm really just asking.


That's an easy one.

A religion is a cult with political, economic, or military power

(and a cult is a religion you don't belong to).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Democratt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. (and a cult is a religion you don't belong to).
It seems to be that way, doesn't it???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Cyclical, but cute. Does it still constitute a religion ...
...with enough donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. So what's the atheist symbol? A question mark?
Ooops. No. That would be the agnostics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Democratt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Here it is!!!!!!!
You can find it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Believe it or not...
It's a stylized Niels Bohr "atom." Beats me why they chose that or which atheists were consulted, but there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackHeart Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I'll have to ask
at our local atheist Easter service this Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Here are the Arlington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Thanks for posting this
I didn't have much time to Google yesterday and didn't think to go right to the source.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. No Unification Church or Church of Scientology
They're probably arguing over which one gets the '$'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. The irony is that atheism isn't a religion, while Wicca is.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. CERTAINLY is violating the constitution. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC