Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cardinal: Condoms 'Lesser Evil' to Prevent AIDS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 01:57 PM
Original message
Cardinal: Condoms 'Lesser Evil' to Prevent AIDS

VATICAN CITY (1010 WINS) -- A senior cardinal who was considered for the papacy last year said in comments published Friday that the Roman Catholic Church should soften its ban on condoms because of the scourge of AIDS.


(snip)

... Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan of Mexico, who has said condoms could sometimes be condoned, such as when a woman cannot refuse the sexual advances of her HIV-positive husband.

http://www.1010wins.com/pages/27715.php?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw that yesterday and considered posting it
Gee, Aids is worse than condoms?! Are you sure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL
pathetic that it has taken this long but I am happy for any move forward no matter how incremental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. no, aids BY RAPE -- MIGHT -- be worse than condoms
"when a woman can't refuse the advances of her hiv-positive husband" i.e., marital rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's her "DUTY" to put up with his "advances", isn't it?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think the Church makes a distinction there...
A woman is obligated to "put out" according to doctrine as I understand it.

It's not rape to take something to which you're entitled. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That line about the woman who cannot refuse her husband floored me!
Jesus Christ on a moped, where do they get these clowns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Score one for life!
:party:

In another 100 years, who knows where we may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. If a woman has a HIV Positive husband (HOW did he get that way?)
who is raping her, I say kick the bastard out and get a DIVORCE - Catholic Church "married for life" crap or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Back up the excommunication wagon - we got a blasphemer!
Always fells good when a prince of the church comes to the darkside. Condoms are Satan's tools. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Welcome to the new millenium... no not the first millenium. Or the second.
Welcome to the third one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. Okay, folks, get a grip ...
A Catholic woman is, indeed, allowed to "refuse the advances" of her husband.

Cardinal Barragan was trying to avoid saying "rape".

He was also trying to avoid saying, "if you're gonna screw, kids, use a freakin' condom".

And chances are he's going to catch holy hell for this, although Benedict is turning out to be a lot less fascistic than I initially thought.

"Joey Rats" might just surprise us again.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC