Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the definition of "agnositc" and is that different from believing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:15 AM
Original message
What is the definition of "agnositc" and is that different from believing
in a "first cause?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Agnostic believes in a higher something
but not organized religion..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Does an agnostic believe in a higher being? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Actually, an agnostic doesn't believe anything
The agnostic simply doesn't know and doesn't think s/he knows.

It's not a "middle" or "compromise" position -- it's based on a philosophical principle.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Agnostic is by definition the 'middle' position. Theism is: God exists,
and Atheism is: It is not the case that God exists. So, mathematically, God exists would be 1 ad God does not exist would be -1. Therefore, not knowing would be 0...or the 'middle' position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. I think that's wrong.

An agnostic is someone who doesn't know whether or not a god exists.

What you're describing would be something like deism, or a form of mysticism, although I don't know if there's a technical term for it precisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Where did you hear that? It has to do with knowledge or a lack of it.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&defl=en&q=define:Agnostic&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

Remember this: A-Theism basically means Without (A) Theism or Without a Belief in a God and A-Gnosticism basically has to do with Not (A) Knowing (Gnosticism) and unable to know of the existance of a God, god or gods.

As in it's unknowable.

Atheism has to do with "belief".

Agnosticism has to do with "knowledge".

The best description on the linked page for Agnostics IMO is:

An Agnostic <1> embraces a worldview in which the existence of deity is unknown or unknowable. Derives from the Greek agnostos, a = without, gnostos = known or knowledge. "Agnostic was coined by Professor TH Huxley in 1869 to describe the mental attitude of one who regarded as futile all attempts to know the reality corresponding to our ultimate scientific, philosophic, and religious ideas."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Democratt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. This is the Webster definition....

agnostic
2 entries found for agnostic.
To select an entry, click on it.
agnostic<1,noun>agnostic<2,adjective>

Main Entry: 1ag·nos·tic
Pronunciation: ag-'näs-tik, &g-
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek agnOstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnOstos known, from gignOskein to know -- more at KNOW
: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and prob. unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
- ag·nos·ti·cism

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agnostic is unsure of the existence of God.
Theist is sure that there is a God, Atheists are sure there isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. But I want to know what you think about a first cause regarding theists.
A "first cause" being related to Aristotle and the non-existance of an infinite regress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. not all atheists are "sure"
Some atheists are certain there are no gods. Other atheists (like me) simply see no evidence for gods and would believe in a god if presented with good evidence that one existed. The first case is often called strong atheism while the second is called weak atheism.

It's like magnetic monopoles. I don't believe they exist, but if a paper appeared in a refereed physics journal claiming to have found one and other physicists were able to repeat the result, I would have to reconsider my stance on magnetic monopoles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. 'I don't know'
That's the definition for me right now. It's fluid and I may change my mind, but I don't know. I don't know if God exists, but if he/she/it does, it's nothing like what the fundies say.

I believe Jesus was here and his message got hijacked after he died. It's possible he rose in the spiritual form, but I don't think it was a physical rising.

I'm still trying to figure it all out. So, I guess that makes me agnostic. When I think about it, I think I've been one for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I could not agee with you more except that I don't believe in a
"spiritual form" that Jesus could have "rose" from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
31. Oh I think Jesus could have risen physically
From a coma. It would have passed for death back then.

And I'm an agnostic too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Asking for the definition of a belief......
Is like asking a hundred blind men to describe the color Red. You'll get a hundred different answers and none of them will be quite right.

Good luck. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm not quite sure as to how to respond to analogies like this because
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 03:27 AM by MJDuncan1982
by definition an analogy implies that all of the properties are not equal.

Hence, I tend not to use/trust analogies because of their inherent non-equalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. You just made my brain hurt.
I guess that's what I deserve for providing a flippant answer to a serious question, but it was still mean.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yeah:) Sorry for the bad syntax/grammar...I just noticed my error:) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. except that agnosticism is not a belief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. LOL! Thanks for proving my point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Basically agnostics are skeptics
They don't know if there's a God or not, believe it's not proveable either way, and therefore don't dwell on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Dyslexic agnostic insomniacs dwell on it.
They lie awake the whole night trying to figure if there really is a dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. happens to me all the time...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. I don't think "not dwelling on it" is part of the definition.

Or that an agnostic technically has to believe that it's not proveable, either (although I'm sure most do), just that it's not *proven*.

I think it's entirely possible for an agnostic to spend a lot of time wondering about whether or not god exists, provided they don't reach a definite conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadcenter Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. my
paleontology professor referred to Agnositics as "gutless atheists". Personally, I'm in the camp of "I'm not sure about god, but I'm sure that I don't believe in organized religion, but that's just me", camp of philosophies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. I (agnostic) think of mysel as an optimistic atheist.
Or as I sometimes define my "religion", Some days I'm an atheist,but on a good day, I'm an agnostic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. What it comes down to is we do not believe in a fundie God
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 02:35 AM by Erika
We may believe in some other superior being but we may not. We don't give our accountability of our actions to be judged by others, we judge ourselves. Normally, we are much harder on ourselves than someone who thinks someone else was the scapegoat (whipping boy) for our wrong doings and they were punished for our sins. It doesn't quite meet logic muster.

Feudal kings had whipping boys who were lashed whenever their master was guilty. Why Christ was created?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. So would you label me as an agnostic?
Really I don't know where I stand on religion at this point in time but I do now i dont worship the same being as the fundies do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
12.  I don't know where I fall really.
I still go to church but just to recieve communion and because I am able to help with the local food pantry. Other than that I really dont know where I fall but I can say with certainty I really dislike conservative dogma thumpers. I can't stand em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. easy

Greek 'a' ('without') + 'gnostikos' ('knowledge/certainty'). Essentially, someone who admits he or she has no special knowledge, aka particularly meaningful or decisive evidence, to enable him/her to reach a conclusion about the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. You adequately define "agnostic," what about the idea of a 'first cause?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Some have claimed that a 'first cause' must be 'god' by definition
because they define 'god' as 'that which is not created'. If you do want to bring a 'first cause' into theology, it probably makes you a 'deist' - that some entity created the universe, but has had no apparent effect on it since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
40. this reminds me of something about intelligent design
One of the reasons it cracks me up to see evangelical Christians embrace intelligent design is that the argument from design is really an argument for deism. If everything was designed as the ID movement claims, that lends exactly zero support to the specific claims made about the Christian god.

A god who designed my sinus cavities to drain as poorly as they do doesn't seem like the sort of fellow who could raise a man from the dead, or who is worth singing hymns to once a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. I don't try to define myself....
...as being agnostic.....I do believe there is some higher power.........but I also beleive that most of the Bible was written from the male perspective of King James time and I am loathe to go along with much of it. The bible and religion has held women down for centuries and it's about time that bullshit was put to a stop.

I don't hold much of organized religion very highly in my thoughts. It's been my experience that organized religion is self serving, hypocritical and discrimantory towards women. Not to mention they meddle in world affairs and politcs when and down thru the centuries has probably been responsible for many of the wars killing millions on this planet. Hard for me to side with any organizations that kill in the name of Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachibk Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. A true agnostic believes that god is "unknowable" to the human mind
You can be a theist agnostic (Belief in a higher power but feel that the nature of this being is totally unknowable) or an atheistic agnostic (not only is the nature of god unknowable but so too is the existence of god).

Thus, the agnostic really isn't 1/2 way between a theist and an atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Exacta-friggen-mundo
Agnosticism is a claim regarding knowledge, wereas a/theism is a claim regarding faith or belief. They're two entirely different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. I don't think so.

I think that both the dictionary definitions and the standard usages are:

Atheist: believes that there does not exist a god.

Agnostic: does not know whether or not a god exists. Occasionally, but I think technically incorrectly, used to exclude those who aren't certain for themselves but believe it may be possible to find out.

Theist: a subset of the people who believe that a god exists (I *think* theism implies monotheism, so a religious ancient Greek wouldn't be a theist, although I'm less sure about that one).

But all three are statements about what one believes, and they're all the same sort of claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. I've always taken it 'agnostic' to mean
"I don't know whether or not a God exists", not that I don't know but it may be possible to find out. Those are two different claims, and agnosticism doesn't make the second. Agnosticism is a claim that deals in knowledge and epistemic certainty, not in belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. You usually see the two terms switched.
I am an agnostic atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. I don't think that's true.
Both the dictionary definition and the standard usage of "agnostic" are "one who does not know, or believes it is impossible to know, whether or not there is a god".

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/agnostic
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=agnostic
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=1676&dict=CALD

So "how way between a theist and an atheist" is a fair characterisation, I think.

If you believe that a higher power exists but it's nature is unknowable then you're a theist, but not an agnostic.

If you believe that both the existance and nature of a higher power are unknowable then you're an agnostic but not an atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. thank you.
Agnostics aren't "this part theist" or "this part atheist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
30. Can anyone "know" or provide evidence of a "first cause" and the...
...implications and premises that some people place on it?

Probably not.

From the man that coined the modern description of Agnosticism.

"An Agnostic <1> embraces a worldview in which the existence of deity is unknown or unknowable. Derives from the Greek agnostos, a = without, gnostos = known or knowledge. "Agnostic was coined by Professor TH Huxley in 1869 to describe the mental attitude of one who regarded as futile all attempts to know the reality corresponding to our ultimate scientific, philosophic, and religious ideas."

I would imagine that a "first cause" (And the implications some people wish to make with the claim) would fall into the "unknown" or "unknowable" realm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
36. I am agnostic,
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 02:01 AM by libhill
and my view is that the existence of any deity is unknown, and unknowable. That is the classic definition, although other people may have other takes. Neither do I emphatically deny the possibility that a god of some sort COULD exist. I just don't know. I don't believe it's possible to know. I certainly don't believe in the Judeao - Christian Bible God. In my opinion, Jesus never existed, at least not as a living, breathing, miracle working human being. As to whether or not he did / does exist in some spiritual, metaphysical form, is not for me to speculate on. The Apostle Paul seemed to take that approach, as he never revealed any knowledge of having known any historical or biographical details of such a life, and Paul's writings are considered by most scholars to predate the gospels. There is just no reliable evidence outside the Gospels, (which I do not accept as historical evidence), for a "historical Jesus".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC