Edited on Mon May-16-11 12:22 AM by JonLP24
hit .390 and Gwynn hit .394. Of course .406 is better but those are also very impressive numbers. Only reason why I point that out is a couple months ago I read an article on Deadspin about how humans are attracted to round numbers and used baseball to show that. They went through the the at-bats and every batter from 1975 to 2009 that was batting .299 in their final at bat never drew a walk. They don't get credit for an at-bat and their average doesn't move with a walk. Also players with .300 on the last day of the season are more likely to take the day off. Which is crazy because it is a difference of .001 but it means higher salaries for those with .300 than those who are close.
The article also explained the way humans are attracted to round numbers shows up in other areas of life. Market research for grocery stores that show that people are more likely to pay for something that is $9.99 than something that is $10.00. It also showed the same when cars were slightly under 100,000 miles selling for much more than a car that is slightly over.
Anyways I found that article interesting and noticed the things the article is talked about all over the place. I often ride a bus near a McDonalds and see on their big sign, chicken nuggets for $4.99 so it shows there is some truth. They could of put $5.00 on their big sign but they know less people would probably come in for chicken nuggets. :)
On edit-Heh, I just noticed the OP is a round number. The psychological effect of round numbers is probably the reason why Auggie didn't do a 69 years to do this day thread last year. ;)
|