Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sebastian Janakowski just kicked a 63 yard FG in Denver...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 11:10 PM
Original message
Sebastian Janakowski just kicked a 63 yard FG in Denver...
Becomes only the third in the NFL to do that.
Who are the other two?

Ohhh, Ohhh, I know, I know!

I know too by the way, just look at my avatar...
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great kick.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Things That Make You Go, Hmmmm
Three times in NFL history. Two of them in Denver. One of them below sea level. Which one seems more impressive?
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Tom Dempsey had his own advantage..
I don't know that his special boot would even be allowed today..



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah...
always an advantage to have half a foot.

Douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The NFL has since outlawed boots such as the one Dempsey wore..
obviously someone other than myself thought it gave him an advantage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Then some others are douchebags as well.
Try some research next time.

Dempsey's Proof by Equation

For the average male, the leg is about 20% of total body mass. Taking this into account, Elam’s leg weight is about 38 pounds. Dempsey is built like a linebacker. At 6 feet 2 inches and 255 pounds, his right leg weighs approximately 50 pounds.

With so many variables, it became evident that to prove the advantage or disadvantages Dempsey may have had with his shoe, these variables had to be removed as much as possible. A mechanical kicking machine was created to prove or disprove the theory.

With four sensors attached to the end of the machine, Dempsey’s shoe was attached to the machine and a football was kicked. After Dempsey’s shoe was tested against Elam’s, the results showed that Tom Dempsey’s shoe did not give an advantage at all. In fact, it was more of a disadvantage in having a larger area between the ball and shoe, making it easier for error.

The soccer-style kick and shoe of Elam had an area on the edge of his footwear showing at around 8.4 inches. The custom made shoe of Dempsey had an area at the tip of about four square inches. With both shoes have the virtually identical force behind them, it proves that Dempsey made those 63-yard field goals perfectly, and with no help from his shoe. If anything, his shoe hindered his kicking style.

If all things were to be considered, one has to remember the air density in Denver is 20% less than that of New Orleans, so in all actuality, Dempsey’s field goal attempts would have traveled close to seventy yards.
http://www.suite101.com/content/did-tom-dempseys-custom-shoe-assist-with-kicking-distance-a323212

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Interesting...
but by my reading the kicking machine test with Dempsey's shoe seems to address accuracy more than distance.

the results showed that Tom Dempsey’s shoe did not give an advantage at all. In fact, it was more of a disadvantage in having a larger area between the ball and shoe, making it easier for error.

I'm not trying to downplay the record kicks of Dempsey, Elam or Janikowski, but it is notable that all three 63 yard kicks were achieved under other than normal conditions. I think that's more than just coincidence..




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. No They Haven't
They have outlawed advantage providing shoes where it fits within the law. The NFL still has to follow ADA.

You're being ridiculous.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes they have....it's known as the Tom Dempsey rule
any shoe that is worn by a player with an artificial limb on his kicking leg must have a kicking surface that conforms to that of a normal kicking shoe.

http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2008/05/nfl-rules-named-after-players/

Controversy about Tom Dempsey's unorthodox shoe, which pro football legend Sid Gillman helped design, eventually led the NFL to standardize footwear policy for kickers in 1977. Rule 5, Section 4, Article 3 of the NFL Rule Book reads in part: "Kicking shoes must not be modified (including using a shoelace wrapped around toe and/or bottom of the shoe), and any shoe that is worn by a player with an artificial limb on his kicking leg must have a kicking surface that conforms to that of a normal kicking shoe."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=wickersham_seth&id=5648473
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Unenforceable
No matter what they would like to do, they still have to follow the law.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. It wouldn't keep Dempsey (or anybody else) from kicking
they would just have to wear a shoe that conforms to the shape of a normal kicking shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Read The Abstract Of The ADA Law
That's not a reasonable accommodation. That's no accommodation at all.

Sorry, but you're wrong on this one.

If someone took it to court over ADA, they'd win. The law is VERY clear and quite explicit.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. perhaps, but I'm not convinced because
Employers are required to make reasonable accommodations for people with known physical/mental limitations, but I'm not sure it's a limitation with respect to wearing a standard-shaped shoe (esp. with prosthetics, inserts, etc.). Maybe it does in the context of football, but I don't know. I don't think it would be so clear-cut. It's a different issue from something like the Casey Martin case because Martin had a much stronger need for the accommodation. On the other hand, the NFL would have even less of a case that the accommodation would fundamentally change the game than did the PGA, and the court didn't the PGA's argument there. (That case is different, too, since it fell under Title III, but it seems like the closest to compare; I know there have been a few players over the years who have sued the NFL and other leagues as alcoholics under ADA, but that involved suspensions/reinstatements rather than playing conditions.) At any rate, I doubt it will ever be an issue, since nobody kicks with that straight-forward style anymore.

All that said, though, I agree with you that it didn't provide him any advantage, and any attempt to undermine his record is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-11 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. We Agree and Disagree
The PGA thing is not an appropriate example. Riding DOES change the game. Wearing a shoe that fits a deformed fit that can be proven to provide no advnatage doesn't.

So, failing to accommodate the dysfunction is not reasonable.

But, we agree in principle.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. It Would
A guy who overcame a major birth defect had an advantage. Really? Way to denigrate a guy who overcame a disability. Nice. I hope you just didn't think ahead.

But, ADA applies to the NFL too. It's a reasonable accommodation for a guy with a legal handicap.

And, since nobody kicks straight on anymore, nobody would need that boot.

Shame on you and your insensitivity.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yep...that must be it Professor..
I'm just insensitive that's all....when political correctness clashes with the truth, I'll take the truth every time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Problem is---as proven above
it's not the truth.

Just doubling down on your doucheness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Kicking machine test proved little or nothing
as it relates to distance. As I stated in #7, it looks to me like it addresses accuracy more than anything else. And the "Tom Dempsey rule" wouldn't have been enacted if there wasn't controversy surrounding his use of the special shoe..

Just from my own POV, I can see where having what was essentially the head of a mallet of the end of his leg would be a hindrance to accuracy but an advantage when it comes to kicking for distance...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Controversy, Huh?
I'm old enough to remember Tom Dempsey. There was no controversy. Just complaining by a bunch of insensitive louts who didn't want to provide an accommodation to a guy born with that bad foot.

Using the word controversy doesn't make it a controversy.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Controversy:
A dispute, especially a public one, between sides holding opposing views.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/controversy

Now, you can refer to one particular side as "a bunch of insensitive louts" all you like, but the disagreement over Dempsey's special shoe still meets the definition of the word..
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. You started this by saying Dempsey had an advantage...
It's clearly been proven that he did not.... as a matter of fact, he was at a disadvantage.

Prove that he had an advantage---or keep up the doucheness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Only To You
This was not a public dispute. Like i said, i was a football fan when Dempsey was playing, and his shoe was not a matter of public debate.

So, your definition only works to you.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Someone actually kicked further than a 63-yarder
in Denver but was pre-season game. Might be Elam but I'm pretty sure it was someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. It was Ola Kimrin -- and he still didn't make the team :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. Dempsey's and Elam's seem equally impressive -- Janakowski's not so much
Edited on Wed Sep-14-11 05:45 PM by fishwax
Sincerely,
A Broncos Fan


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Steve Dempsey was one---oops Tom Dempsey
Edited on Tue Sep-13-11 09:26 AM by Kingofalldems
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Tom Demsey and I think Jason Elam
Edited on Tue Sep-13-11 12:00 PM by Doctor_J
there should be an asterisk for kicking one at Mile High.

Edit: I figured Grossberger would be the next one. He was phenom coming out of FSU and his career in Raider Nation has been obscure but very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. 67% of those kicks occurred in Denver.
:think:

The other third happened in a dome.

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Bzzzzzzzzt!
Dempsey's kick occurred in 1970, when the Saints still played outdoors at Tulane Stadium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yep...and check the field conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. What KamaAina Said
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Nice Scooby snack.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GusBob Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. I listened to him play a local high school game
many moons ago on the radio
he lines up for a 47 yarder, nails it, flag on the play back up 5 yards
from 52, good another flag
from 57, good with plenty to spare, no flag this time

this was in high school his first or second year of playing american fb
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. Jan Stenerud attempted a 113 yard FG at Montana State
They had a lousy punter and the rules in those days did not return the ball to the spot of the missed kick. Stenerud made it to the opponent's 30.

BTW, I remember Dempsey also. There was no controversy. He was a good guy and not a particularly accurate kicker. Detroit barely made any attempt to rush the kick and many players collapsed in disbelief when it was signaled good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Tony Franklin kicked two 60+ field goals in one game at Texas A&M. 65 and 64 yards. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC