|
as among my favorite reading material. I'm a boxing fan, and I think it's fair to say that boxing is the sport with the greatest social-political implications, in the historic sense. But certainly, the issues that are mentioned in the OP are of real significance -- the team ownership, etc.
I recently read Teddy Atlas autobiography ("Atlas"). As most DUers who read the sports forum probably know, Teddy is one of ESPN's guys who does the Friday Night Fights, and the Wednesday NF when ESPN covers them. He has called himself "kind of a psychology guy," and in reading the book, sports fans get an honest look at the psychology of boxing. Teddy was an angry, violent youth. Unlike many people associated with the sport, he didn't come from a poor background; his father was a successful doctor, and Teddy had material comforts. But his family was "dysfunctional," so to speak, and he had a lot of hostility. He was a criminal who found that he could channel his rage in the ring. And he ended up associated with the great Cus D'Amato, and in an interesting way, he carries on Cus's ways.
My friend Rubin Carter wrote a heck of an autobiography in the 1970s, and has been the subject of two books and a movie since then. He wrote another book, though there have been some legal issues that have delayed its publication.
And there have been a few high quality books in recent years that cover the political significance of a couple heavyweight fights: the Jack Johnson vs Jim Jefferies, and the second Joe Louis vs Max Schmeling matches.
I also have enjoyed books like Bill Bradley's autobiography, and the two by Howard Cosell.
If there are threads on good sports books on this forum, I'd certainly be reading them.
|