Interesting to see how the Mets and Dodgers did today. Also, the other New York
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-09-09 08:30 PM
Original message |
| Interesting to see how the Mets and Dodgers did today. Also, the other New York |
|
team got hammered by the Orioles.
Even more curious is the Natinals are leading Arizona.
Hmmm.
|
| Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-09-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yes..it is interesting |
|
the Pirates have now lost 7 in a row, 11 of 12...and the kings of ineptitude are now playing .400 baseball for the season.
Seventeen in a row comin' right up!
:woohoo:
|
| madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-09-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Even more interesting is how |
|
you worship a self admitted steroid addict.
|
| Onceuponalife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-09-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Interesting see the Dodgers clobber the Giants today |
|
sans Manny.
And I gotta say Fred Lewis is the worst left fielder I've ever seen. The guy's an embarassment.
|
| cboy4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-09-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. That's okay. You get Tim Lincecum tomorrow. |
|
We'll take 2-of-3 on the road any time.
And then we go home and play the powerful Nationals.
The Dodgers go on the road and play three in Philadelphia and three in Florida.
I predict a disastrous road trip.
|
| TZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. I wouldn't take the Nats for granted |
|
The Dodgers did after being up 6-0...I'll laugh my ass off if the Nats sweep ..
|
| cboy4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. Well they won't sweep because they get Cain and Zito, |
|
which seems hard for me to believe I'm including Zito.
I'm less concerned about the Nats scoring than I am the Giants doing so since they do have the worst hitting in the NL.
|
| Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
| 6. The Metropolitans have a good team. It's no surprise they're playing fairly well. |
| petronius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. So that's what 'Mets' is short for, huh? |
|
Cool! I've got my learn-one-new-thing-per-day task out of the way, and it's not even 8:30 am... :)
|
| Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Whew! Tell me something I don't know! |
| petronius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. I could tell you that A's is short for Athletics, but you probably already know that |
|
How about this: if it wasn't for a massive artificial control structure, it's likely that the Mississippi River would soon change course to bypass New Orleans and Baton Rouge altogether.
That's kinda interesting, right?
|
| Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-10-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Actually, it is! I saw a New Deal film about the Mississippi years ago... |
|
I'll have to scout that.
I LOVE tidal stuff - thanks!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
