|
The Use of Place, Family, and Time in the Works of William Faulkner
William Cuthbert Faulkner is more than a famous Mississippi writer. He is a legendary figure, not only for Southern writers, but for writers throughout the world. Faulkner drew the scenes and characters for his novels and short stories from observations made during his childhood and adult life in his hometown, Oxford, Mississippi. During what is generally considered his period of greatest artistic achievement, a span of forty years, from 1929 to 1942, Faulkner accomplished more than most writers accomplish in a lifetime of writing (Minter 2). Because of his dedication to his writing and the acceptance of his ideas by readers from around the world, Faulkner was awarded the 1949 Nobel Prize for Literature. Additionally, Faulkner received two Pulitzer Prizes for fiction: one in January 1955 for his novel, The Fable, and another given posthumously, in June 1962, for his novel, The Reivers (Minter 321). He is truly a writer who utilizes unique writing techniques to explain the life of the Southern man to his readers. Many critics believe that his fictional world, vivid characters and time usage provide the reader with a personal experience that is unparalleled by any other writer. William Faulkner, an incomparable writer from the Deep South, deftly connects place, family and time as shown in Absalom, Absalom!, “Barn Burning,” and The Sound and The Fury. Perhaps the most unique creation to evolve from Faulkner’s writings is the region of Yoknapatawpha County, an imaginary area in Mississippi with a colorful history and a richly varied population. Transforming his “postage stamp of native soil” into a fictional setting allowed Faulkner to explore, articulate and challenge “the old verities and truths of the heart” (Millgate, “William Faulkner” 1). Yoknapatawpha County is a microcosm of the South as a whole, and Faulkner’s novels examine the effects of the dissolution of traditional values and authority on all levels of Southern society. “It was invented, fabricated whole, in accordance with the perceived needs of its inventor. It is not a geographical or sociological or even a historical expression but a pure literary creation, not real estate, but a moral landscape” (Millgate, “Faulkner’s Portrayal” 34). Faulkner has said that his imaginary Mississippi County is “a kind of keystone of the universe.” If it were taken away, he went on to say “the universe would collapse” (Fargnoli and Golay 287). Yoknapatawpha County is the primary setting in many of Faulkner’s works, including Satoris; The Sound and The Fury; As I Lay Dying; Sanctuary; These 13; Light in August; Doctor Martino and Other Stories; Absalom, Absalom!; The Unvanquished; The Hamlet; Go Down, Moses and Other Stories; Intruder in the Dust; Knight’s Gambit; Collected Stories of William Faulkner; and Requiem for a Nun (Miner 14). As a writer, Faulkner’s primary concern is to probe his own region, the Deep South. He deliberately draws much of his inspiration from his native Mississippi because that is what he knows best. In a letter to Malcolm Crowley, in 1944, Faulkner writes, “I’m inclined to think that my material, the South, is not very important to me...I just happen to know it and don’t have time in one life to learn another one and write at the same time” (Millgate, “Faulkner’s Portrayal” 32). Critic Malcolm Crowley believes, however, that Faulkner’s choice of setting is a labor of imagination that is unequaled in American literature. He comments that “first, invents a Mississippi County that was life a mythical kingdom, but one that was complete and living in all its details. Second, he made his story of Yoknapatawpha County read as a parable or legend of all the Deep South” (Fargnoli and Golay 256). The Yoknapatawpha novels demonstrate that “a provincial focus on setting could sharpen an artist’s grasp of permanence” (“William Faulkner, past” 1). The name “Yoknapatawpha” is derived from “two Chickasaw words-“yocona” and “petopha” which means “split land.” The compound word, according to Faulkner, means “water flowing slow through the flatland” (Kerr 1144). The fictional county is presented as being an area of 2,400 square miles; with a population of 15,611 persons. Within the boundaries of the county, “there is the rich delta land of the hunt; there is the sand and brush country; there is Jefferson with its jail, the town square, and the old houses which display decay” (Fargnoli and Golay 256). It is a self-contained world of rich bottom lands, broad cotton fields, eroded hills, and pine barrens. Within the physical limits, the area includes Chickasaw Indians, African Americans, slaves, plantation masters, defeated Confederates, indomitable spinsters, and poor white hill farmers. There are also charlatans, thieves, and rascals who jostle with hard-working folk (Fargnoli and Golay 256). Within the geography of his fictional county, William Faulkner repeatedly interconnects three major families within the works of Absalom, Absalom!, “Barn Burning,” and The Sound and The Fury. The families of the Sutpens in Absalom, Absalom!, the Snopes in “Barn Burning,” and the Compsons in The Sound and The Fury represent a unique part of the Southern population of Faulkner’s world. Each of the families carry their own burden of guilt, face the harshest of conflicts and struggles, and respond to it in their own way. Absalom, Absalom! chronicles the rise and fall of the Yoknaptawpha County planter, Thomas Sutpen, “a West Virginian of obscure origins who comes into northern Mississippi in the 1830's to fulfill a grand aristocratic design” (Fargnoli and Golay 1). As a young boy, he is turned away from a prominent home in Jefferson, the county seat, because he was not considered worthy to enter the door. He is determined from this point forward to become “someone.” Faulkner presents Sutpen, a nouveau riche, as a “flawed, corrupt, doomed creator and master of Sutpens Hundred, the plantation he hacks out of the Yoknapatawpha County wilderness in the 1830's” (229). The plantation is located twelve miles from Jefferson (230). Sutpen’s mission is “to create a vast design of wealth, power, and progeny in the form of white, male heirs.” (MWP: William Faulkner 1). Sutpen takes a wife from Haiti, but soon discovers that she has black blood in her veins. He shuns her and their son, Charles Bon. He then takes a “white” wife from a respectable Jefferson family and begins to build his dynasty again. Sutpen’s great design is “not what he wanted to do but what he just had to do, had to do it whether he wanted to or not, because if he did not do it he knew that he could never live with himself for the rest of his life” (Fargnoli and Golay 229). “The irony of Sutpen’s failure lies in the fact that he can not achieve the design precisely because he is unable to exclude such human elements as Charles Bons’ need for his father’s love and recognition (Grant 17). Faulkner demonstrates through the Sutpen family that the urge to possess is the fundamental evil from which other evils spring (17). Sutpen’s need to establish a perfect order in the world, into which he will fit, is in the end, his demise. Another major family history which Faulkner depicts in his works is the Snopes family. This family represents the epitome of poor white trash in Faulkner’s works. The Snopes family history is first introduced in “Barn Burning” (1939). This is the name Faulkner gives to a “rapacious group of kinsfolk who encroach upon the town of Jefferson, Mississippi, for personal gain. Often referred to as a group of “white misfits,” none of them seem to bear any specific kinship to one another; they were just Snopes, like colonies of rats or termites are just rats and termites” (Fargnoli and Golay 211). The Snopes family is headed by Abner Snopes. This unscrupulous scavenger is considered to be a barn-burner and horse thief. He is a very vengeful person. He is accused, but not convicted of, burning a plantation owner’s barn while he is renting from him. Because of his lack of any work ethic, he constantly moves his family from town to town, all the while living off the generosity of the townspeople. He seems to take advantage of every gesture of good will that is made toward him and his family, and with each move creates a new enemy. In “Barn Burning,” he purposefully ruins an expensive rug belonging to Major de Spain, the plantation owner, by walking on it with horse manure on his shoes. He is ordered to pay for the rug, and takes revenge by burning de Spain’s barn.
|