Hey,
Today Salon has an article called "The Blogger Who Loathed Me" by Steve Almond:
http://salon.com/books/feature/2005/10/13/blog/index.html4 paras of excerpts:
Indeed, it struck as me as one of the dinkier titles in the history of belles-lettres to be the president of the Steve Almond Haters Club -- like being an ambassador to Liechtenstein, or maybe, more accurately, an ambassador from Liechtenstein.
Pynchon. DeLillo. Foster Wallace. These were authors one might be proud to revile. But me? I was a short story writer with a small press. The closest I'd come to the New Yorker was a subscription. I couldn't even find an agent to represent me...
For another thing, my discussion with Pete had hipped me to the idea that Sarvas wanted, rather desperately, to be involved with me. Whether he knew it or not -- chances are not -- he was toting around a whole scrotum full of fantasies. The basic one in which he mustered the courage to insult me to my face. The exalted one in which he read so brilliantly at our shared appearance that I was forced to bow down before him and admit that he was right: I really was just a self-promoting hack. The kinky one in which we slapped one another with silk gloves then changed into tights and fought a duel.
It was my job not to gratify this shit. Any sign that I knew who he was, that he mattered to me in any way, would simply give him too much pleasure. (Let me be honest: I was concerned he might ejaculate in his pants.) So I had to be very detached.
-------------------------------------------------
I read this piece with horrified fascination, because my experience with an envious literary cyberstalker has now been going on for more than ten years. Only recently I learned of two fake personae he used to engage me in discussion with harmful intent. His obsessive online attacks are even freakier than those of Almond's stalker, because religious mania and fraud are combined with literary envy. Almond doesn't provide much solace in explaining the phenomenon, but I found it helpful to know I'm not alone. Much more obscure than Almond, I continue to be amazed that a couple of university press books that sold fewer than 5000 copies ten years ago could inspire an apparent lifelong destructive obsession. "Why ME?" is even more justified in my case than in Almond's. But the main questions that have perplexed me for ten years now are these: 1) how could any aspiring author make such a relentless display of literary envy without knowing or caring what it reveals about his twisted psychology and 2) how could anyone enable such a vile parasite by pretending that his activity was anything but than pathological and self-destructive?
Has anyone else here experienced this phenomenon, or observed it? What does it mean?
CYD