Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A book I contributed to comes out next week.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Writing Group Donate to DU
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:50 AM
Original message
A book I contributed to comes out next week.
I'd ask you all to run out and buy it, but it's pricey ($175 to you chaps, £80 for us).

It's a monumental study of industrial and product design published by Phaidon - 999 Design Classics. I researched and wrote 17 of its entries. You can see a rather swish Flash presentation about the (three volume!) project here:

http://www.phaidon.com/designclassics/designclassics.html

And as a special "treat" here are some snippets of the bits I wrote: :boring:

Although it had relatives and predecessors in the US, it was a radical departure for the UK and proved instantly popular. There are many causes of this success, and many reasons the bike embedded itself so firmly as the symbol of a 1970s childhood. For a start, the UK launch by chance coincided with the release of the film Easy Rider, which glamorised and popularised the biker culture of the States, and the Chopper resembled the low-riding hogs in the film. Also, its pure difference was alluring; its geometric frame, wheel ratio, seat and handlebars were completely distinctive. But perhaps the most important factor was that it looked and felt tough – it looked as though it had been designed with more grown-up priorities than most bikes, a product of motorcycle and car design. (The gearstick was an important part of this; advertising played on how it made the Chopper more like a racing car than a bike.) It felt as though it treated kids like adults.

(From the story of the "Chopper" BMX)


The seasonal and recreational uses of the folding garden chair have vested in it a great deal of charm. It is as much a part of the mental image of the bank holiday weekend or seaside excursion as the ice cream or knotted handkerchief. By happy accident, it seems ideally designed for enforced relaxation. It is impossible to sit up straight in a deck chair – the seated person is forced to recline. Few useful tasks can be accomplished from a deck chair other than reading or dozing. Once you’re in a deck chair, you’re not only going to have to do very little but stretch out and watch the passing scene, you’re also going to be there for a while – they’re quite difficult to get out of. The deck chair, for all its no-nonsense roots and practicality, is the ultimate labour-saving device – a machine for maximising idleness.

(From the origins of the deck chair)


The term “tensegrity” was coined by American architect Buckminster Fuller to refer to large structures that exist in a state of perfect tensional equilibrium - the forces pushing outward from the structure are cancelled out by circumferential forces banding the structure. Pressure applied anywhere to the structure is distributed evenly through it. Fuller’s renowned geodesic domes are an obvious example of tensegrity, but the principle is so elegant that not only are these domes theoretically unlimited in size, they also have applications in nanotechnology and have been assembled on a molecular level. Whatever the scale, the same rules apply.

(From the uses of "Buckyballs" in the design of footballs)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. A 'Chopper' a BMX? I hope you didn't say that in the book
The last thing you'd want to do with a Chopper would be take it off road, or attempt tricks with it. Its distinctive design actually made it a rather unstable bike. It was all about image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, I didn't say that in the book.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 12:12 PM by Taxloss
I wasn't certain how Americans would refer to a pushbike like the Chopper.

I met Tom Karen in the course of writing this - lovely fellow. Has a bit of a thing about bottoms though.

On edit: Actually, there were tricks that could be done with Choppers, despite their impracticality. The difficulty in performing them was, perversely, part of the outsider appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Congrats I know how good that feels
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good work. The third one is very tight, it's functionality
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 03:02 PM by petgoat
echoing Fuller's rationalistic structures.

The other two are a bit wordy, with conspicuous passive verbs of being in #1 and more
sentences than you need in #2.

I really like the image of a "machine for maximizing idleness" (I designed a "chair for
seduction" once). I think I would have led with that image rather than closing with it.

Good work, though, and congratulations! :hi:

I normally stick to the theory-of-writing and practice-of-writing threads on this board
since whatever people say, they don't really want criticism of their works. But in
your case, since we're such good friends from the Pseudoscience board, I thought I'd
indulge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, thank you.
:hi:

The one I'm working on at the moment is about skyscraper engineering in desert environments, you might be interested to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "skyscraper engineering in desert environments"
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 03:46 PM by petgoat
Engineered to absorb multiple hits from 747s I assume? :)

Do you have self-smothering jet-fuel downspouts?

Why would anyone want a skyscraper in the desert? Are desert building sites cursed with
Tokyo prices? It seems that the amount of floor space necessary for elevators and
structure make them space-inefficient unless you use a pyramid form.

Congratulations again on your publications credit! Salud! I must admit that though I've
given years of my life to writing and racked my soul doing it, I haven't been published
any place that matters to me.




Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Dubai, Riyadh and Kuwait all like their skyscrapers.
Writing-wise my real passion is fiction, but stuff like this pays the rent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Congrats,Taxloss!
Was this a freelance project or are you working with a company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank Kat! It was a freelance job.
I wrote a series of articles on design icons - the caterpillar track, the dollar bill, the USB port etc. - for a design magazine and Phaidon commissioned me on the strength of those.

The design icon articles aren't archived online, but one of of my reviews is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Jolly Good show! The trailers made me want to see that but
I missed it.

What is it that Garrison Keillor says about Norwegian bachelors? Something to the effect that
Powdermilk Biscuits in the big green box are made from whole wheat raised by Norwegian bachelor
farmers so "they’re not only good for you, they’re also pure, mostly."

Speaking of design icons, have you heard of the Deception Dollar?

http://www.deceptiondollar.com/8+/I8Front.jpg

http://www.deceptiondollar.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Reading & Writing » Writing Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC