it's a scam.
Blog entry about them
http://leegoldberg.typepad.com/a_writers_life/2005/01/another_publish.htmlSFWA article about them
http://www.sfwa.org/beware/services.html#Marketinganother blog entry (comments in this one are very telling)
http://grumpyoldbookman.blogspot.com/2005/05/new-thinking-by-bookseller-world.htmlcomments from a lit agent's blog
http://misssnark.blogspot.com/2005/10/more-on-pod-people.htmldescription from "Preditors and Editors"
http://www.anotherealm.com/prededitors/peba.htmAuthorHouse (formerly 1st Books): Not recommended. A vanity publisher.
5/17/06 - If you don't know by now, AuthorHouse lost a libel suit in court. It seems that the courts and jury decided that a publisher couldn't disavow itself of what it published. In other words, AuthorHouse should have vetted what it accepted before publishing. Now they owe several hundred thousand dollars and may have to pay even more in punitive damages.
more useful info from P n' E
http://www.anotherealm.com/prededitors/pubwarn.htmSome General Rules for Spotting a Scam PublisherOpenly advertises for writers in print or online publications or both.
Openly claims that it's not a vanity or subsidy publisher.
Claims that it has a new business model that will bring success, but never explains why other successful publishers aren't utilizing it.
The publisher gives no or very low advances for books it buys.
The publisher's books are rarely in any bookstores, particularly the large chain stores that carry books from just about all reputable commercial publishers.
The publisher's books have never been seen on a bestseller list published by a reputable source such as the New York Times, especially when said publisher claims to be large.
The publisher's books rarely sell more than 5,000 books to readers in individual purchases and more often fail to reach that number.
The publisher refuses to release even approximate sales figures for its own bestsellers.
When confronted with very low or non-existent sales, the publisher refuses to release the book from contract.
Books it claims to have published were actually published by another publisher, now defunct, that used the same business name.
Its contracts contain provisions that prohibit complaints by its authors about its service and product.
Postings in online forums never seem to include anyone who was rejected.
Online forum criticism is frequently immediately responded to by a defender of that publisher.
Acceptances usually take place in less than a month. Even less than a week is not unusual.
Acceptance letters tend to be identical when compared with what other authors received.
Contract provisions are specific as to how termination can be invoked, but the publisher disdains using anything other than some other method of communication.
Communications from the publisher are frequently unsigned by any individual using a department address so that no one can be pinned down as responsible for any comments made to the author.
The publisher never gives a direct answer to any direct questions. Instead, the publisher points to others who are satisfied with policy, procedures, contract, or sales as proof that everything is fine.
The publisher has a no return policy on its products.
The publisher threatens to blacklist its authors within the industry should they mention leaving.