|
I'm inclined to suggest books I recommend to people who don't think they like science fiction. Time and Again by Jack Finney is very good in that regard. I'm personally partial to a couple of Canadian s-f authors, Robert Sawyer and Robert Charles Wilson. Wilson's A Bridge of Years is a particular favorite of mine. Both of them write books that are much more driven by character than by plot.
I'm also fond of Jack McDevitt's work. He has two series (of a sort. Each book can be read completely independently) which take place several hundred years in the future, and FTL (faster than light) travel is possible. One is a universe in which we've made contact with a handful of other intelligent races, the other in which we seem to be completely alone in the galaxy. Basically the characters are 21st century people who can travel to other stars and have interesting things happen as a result. But they are completely contemporary to us in behavior and attitudes, and for me that works.
Stephen Jay Gould wrote the very good novel Jumper which was turned into a dreadful movie. He wrote another one called The Wild Side which is about a 19 year old who has access to a portal to an alternate Earth, one in which humans never evolved. What happens when he and his friends visit that other earth and do things like bring back passenger pigeons is the basis of the plot.
I do also like a lot from the "Golden Age", and Asimov's {i}The End of Eternity is one that has been overlooked and is just crying out to be made into a movie.
Personally I'm extremely partial to time travel and alternate history and truly hard science fiction, the kind in which you get a serious dose of physics or chemistry.
Sometimes a novel will have only one science-fictional element to it, and then it's just an arbitrary decision on the part of the publisher as to how to market it. There's a whole large sub-genre of time travel romance novels, but they're romance novels with some odd bit of time travel in it, and of course aren't in any way s-f.
Since your novel does not sound like standard science fiction, maybe catching up in the field isn't so necessary as my first thoughts. There's a lot of stuff out there that isn't defined as science fiction, or at least isn't relegated to the s-f ghetto. Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale comes to mind. Of course, she was already a successful, published writer by the time she wrote that one. But if it had been a first novel from and unknown, it might possibly have wound up in the s-f ghetto.
I suspect you love language and how to express things, and so the rhythm and word usage is as important to you as the story you're telling. I wish I knew the publishing world better. I do sort of hang out in a part of the s-f community, and I've learned a little bit from that. I can tell you that in the s-f community personal contacts with editors are fairly easy to make, and those people are generally willing to look at work from unknown and not yet published writers. But it almost seems like your novel could be published as mainstream, because the thing that might make it s-f is the setting.
|