Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pot Grower to DEA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
DrBloodmoney Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 11:01 PM
Original message
Pot Grower to DEA
I like this little letter to the DEA from a commercial marijuana grower:


I have a blunt message for the Drug Enforcement Administration: I grow marijuana for profit in the United States, you can't stop me, and you are ignorant fools.

I want to make sure I explain my message to the DEA clearly and in detail. One reason is that the DEA people appear to be intellectually deficient, so I have to design my message so that it could be understood even by a child.

Another reason is that my message to the DEA is directly related to the arrest of Marc Emery for selling marijuana seeds to Americans.

Firstly, the issue of growing marijuana for money.

I started growing in 1996 because I was tired of paying street prices for schwag of questionable origin. High prices and lack of quality are a direct result of the war on drugs, which limits supply and makes it harder to get good weed.

My first garden was sprouted from seeds that were in a bag of pot I bought. The DEA seems to think it's hard to get marijuana seeds unless you order them from Marc Emery, but marijuana seeds are everywhere, and have been for many years before Marc Emery began selling them.

Emery is one of hundreds of international marijuana seed brokers who are part of a network of thousands of marijuana seed collectors, breeders, and producers.

If the DEA really wants to interfere with the ability of its citizens to grow marijuana from seed, it is going to have to do a lot more than bust Marc Emery. It's going to have to bust hundreds of thousands of people.


http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/4493.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is easy. Here's how you get rid of marijuana:
Give the seeds to Monsanto. Monsanto produces a spliced marijuana plant and has the patent on it. Monsanto gives the seeds away free the first year, so now everyone is growing the new plant. Monsanto says they have to buy the specials seeds every year. So now we're regulating marijuana and if anyone uses last years seeds Monsanto can go after them and sue them for everything they own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Weird. I had a similar thought today.
I was thinking that marijuana would definitely be legalized if Monsanto figured out a way to patent it. Besides buying legalization with hefty campaign contributions, they would spend millions in PR to get the general public to accept the idea. Weird that we both thought of Monsanto... or maybe not. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
left hand man Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I have farmed all my life and I understand your Monsanto references
But you need to remember that they pulled out of South America because they could not defend their Soybean patent--let them try to defend such a patent ANYWHERE---- since marijuana could (and is) grown without herbicides Monsanto is a moot point.
I do appreciate that there are other people out there that recognize what companies like Monsanto do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The best way to reduce marijuana production is to legalize hemp production
Since hemp is virtually THC-free, its pollen (which would be ever-present in the air of hemp-producing states) would both prevent or disrupt sinsemella production and gradually weaken the quality of the resulting seeds produced by THC-rich strains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Keep your hemp fields away from our pot fields!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe its the sin taxes
When you buy a pack of fags (cigarettes), or a bottle of whiskey, you
pay a significant tax to subsidize the public costs of using said
chemicals. Maybe they are pissed off because they can't get their
sin tax except by attacking drugs users and stealing their posessions,
that in a perverse way, they violate the property protection laws of
the constitution and fuck the public at the same time in a cynical
race of stupidity wins all.

God bless this marijuana grower, the framers of the constitution
are on his side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PerpetualWinter Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Definitely an interesting read, but...
the writer really just came across as an angry teenager. Maybe, I'm just being a bitch because I don't like his style, but as well informed as he is, he just presented it in a way that I think does anything but help our cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC