Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Random student drug tests banned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM
Original message
Random student drug tests banned
Other states allow it. The U.S. Constitution allows it. But the Washington Supreme Court said Thursday that random drug testing of student athletes is not allowed under the state Constitution.

The decision involved athletes who sued the Wahkiakum School District in 1999 after the district began requiring students to undergo urine tests if they wanted to participate in sports. If the tests indicated drug or alcohol use, the student was suspended from sports but wasn't reported to police.

...

Thursday's opinion says Wahkiakum, and by implication other school districts, must stop random drug testing.

The ACLU of Washington, which represented the students and their parents, said the ruling will put an end to suspicionless random drug testing in Washington schools. "The justices concluded, as we had contended, that it violates the state Constitution to require a student to give their urine without any reason to believe they've done anything wrong," spokesman Doug Honig said.

Seattle Times
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hazardballsaem Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yea well
I agree with you completely as being a student athlete myself I don't think that it's right either and Im glad that justice was served for once in this country!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Firethorn Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-12-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm tossed up about this.
Edited on Sat Apr-12-08 01:00 PM by Firethorn
On the one hand, I don't think that testing people without suspicion is right.

On the other hand, given that it's more or less a fact of life in professional sports and the Olympics. I can see the point of the testing.

Drug use at the professional levels is cheating - and rampant if not controlled. I've read a number of cases where HS students were doping - not only cheating, but potentially destroying their still developing bodies for the briefest of successes. It's not likely you'd make it into college/professional sports even if you're doping, and you're incredibly likely to be caught even if you do.

The random part is a cost saving measure.

Part of the 'good' would be that a positive test doesn't get reported to law enforcement. In my job, a positive is reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC