Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Takes a Crack at Drug Policy Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 09:01 AM
Original message
Obama Takes a Crack at Drug Policy Reform
For those of us who fought long and hard to reform the notorious 100-to-one crack / powder cocaine disparity in federal law, the Fair Sentencing Act, signed by President Obama on August 3, is at once a historic victory and a major disappointment. It's both too little, too late and a big step forward.

The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which punished the sale of five grams of crack cocaine the same as 500 grams of powder cocaine, reflected the bipartisan drug war hysteria of the day and was approved with virtually no consideration of scientific evidence or the fiscal and human consequences. The argument for reform has always been twofold: sending someone to federal prison for five years for selling the equivalent of a few sugar packets of cocaine is unreasonably harsh, and it disproportionately affects minorities (almost 80 percent of those sentenced are African-Americans, even though most users and sellers of crack are not black).

The new law increases the amount of crack cocaine that can result in a five-year sentence to twenty-eight grams (i.e., an ounce), thereby reducing the crack/powder ratio to eighteen to one. It also eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession (without intent to distribute) of crack cocaine, thereby marking the first time since 1970 that Congress has repealed a mandatory minimum sentence.

What is the broader significance of the new law?

First, it's one more indication that Obama is making good on his commitment to roll back the drug war. Few reformers, including myself, would have bet that Obama would deliver—in fair measure, and within eighteen months—on all three of the pledges he made while running for president. He said he'd reverse the government's antagonism to state medical marijuana laws—and he did, with the Justice Department announcing last fall that it would essentially defer to local authorities in determining whether medical marijuana facilities were operating legally. He also said he'd support ending the ban on federal funding for needle exchange programs to reduce HIV/AIDS—and he did.

http://criminaljustice.change.org/blog/view/obama_takes_a_crack_at_drug_policy_reform
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
deconstruct911 Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. meanwhile
Edited on Fri Oct-08-10 05:38 PM by deconstruct911
weapons went down in exchange for the cocaine.

Cocaine that was specifically given to crack manufactures. "Freeway Ricky Ross"

The law was the easy way for a drug running administration to look like the "good guys"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Charlotte32 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. hang it up
Really? 2010? Hang it up with the say no to drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC