Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. decrees that marijuana has no accepted medical use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 02:51 PM
Original message
U.S. decrees that marijuana has no accepted medical use
Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. This f'in ruling is just as hokey, ludicrous, and disingenuous as the reasons for TSA
molestation of the flying public and permanent wars financed by other countries that don't spend a wholly disproportionate portion of their national income and wealth on medical care for just some of its citizens, the MIC, and the interest on the public debt to finance the sucking frenzy by the uber-wealthy and large corporations at the public welfare teat. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Check this quote out...
In a June 21 letter to the organizations that filed the petition, DEA Administrator Michele M. Leonhart said she rejected the request because marijuana "has a high potential for abuse," "has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States" and "lacks accepted safety for use under medical supervision." The letter and 37 pages of supporting documents were published Friday in the Federal Register.

Couldn't the exact same thing be said for alcohol?

Michele M. Leonhart info from Wikipediia:

Career
President George W. Bush announced his intention to nominate Leonhart as Deputy Administrator on 31 July 2003 and submitted her nomination to the United States Senate on 3 October 2003. The Senate confirmed her nomination on 8 March 2004. On 15 April 2008, the White House announced that President Bush intended to nominate Leonhart to succeed Tandy as the next Administrator of DEA. Leonhart's nomination was received by the Senate the same day and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. However, the committee did not hold any hearings on Leonhart's nomination, and on 2 January 2009, the nomination was returned to the President under the provisions of Senate Rule XXXI, paragraph 6 of the Standing Rules of the Senate pursuant to sine die adjournment at the end of the 110th Congress.

Confirmation as DEA Administrator
During Leonhart's testimony before the Judiciary Committee, she was questioned by a member of the Committee on Aging, Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI), about her policy for nurses prescribing painkillers for patients in nursing homes. The problem of DEA interference during Leonhart's acting administratorship with the prescription of painkillers by nurses in nursing homes had come before the Committee on Aging. Unsatisfied with her responses to his questions, Senator Kohl threatened to put a hold on Leonhart's nomination that could have postponed the vote on her confirmation indefinitely. In correspondence between the Committee on Aging and the DEA, Senator Kohl received assurances that patients suffering intractable pain could receive painkillers prescribed by nurses. On 22 December 2010, the Senate confirmed Leonhart's nomination unanimously by voice vote.

Controversy
Leonhart has consistently turned down research into the therapeutic and medicinal benefits of marijuana, and has a track record of undermining state law with regard to legal medical marijuana. She has also spoken in favor of the Eighteenth Amendment and suggested a federal ban on production, possession, transportation, sale, and consumption of alcohol. Recently several pro-legalisation agencies have called on President Obama to withdraw his support of Leonhart, including SSDP, MPP, NORML, LEAP, and DPA.

In 2011, the Washington Post reported that "994 people younger than 18 were killed in drug-related violence between late 2006 and late 2010" and that "n 2009, the last year for which there is data, 1,180 children were killed, half in shootings." In response to these statistics, Leonhart declared that while it "may seem contradictory, the unfortunate level of violence is a sign of success in the fight against drugs.” :wtf:



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh Please!
" Friday the federal government ruled that it has no accepted medical use and should remain classified as a highly dangerous drug like heroin"

These people can't really be this out of touch with reality. This statement alone points out how bogus this so called ruling is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. First of all, why is the DEA making the decision?
They're supposed to enforce drug laws, not enact them. Second, why is a career law enforcement official giving opinions on the medical efficacy of any drug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is what happens when you let medical incompetents make medical decisions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are too many bought off Right Dingers in Obama administration.
I don't use drugs, never have and never will. But the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of marijuana being safer than either tobacco or alcohol.

I think at least part of the problem is that it is so easy to grow and its cousin, hemp has so many uses. Cuts into somebody's profits, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. *ahem* No medical use, huh? Explain this, you frauds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
just55650 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. ridiculous
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Drug Policy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC