Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As School Exit Tests Prove Tough, States Ease Standards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:23 PM
Original message
As School Exit Tests Prove Tough, States Ease Standards
A law adopting statewide high school exams for graduation took effect in Pennsylvania on Saturday, with the goal of ensuring that students leaving high school are prepared for college and the workplace. But critics say the requirement has been so watered down that it is unlikely to have major impact.

The situation in Pennsylvania mirrors what has happened in many of the 26 states that have adopted high school exit exams. As deadlines approached for schools to start making passage of the exams a requirement for graduation, and practice tests indicated that large numbers of students would fail, many states softened standards, delayed the requirement or added alternative paths to a diploma.

People who have studied the exams, which affect two-thirds of the nation’s public school students, say they often fall short of officials’ ambitious goals.

“The real pattern in states has been that the standards are lowered so much that the exams end up not benefiting students who pass them while still hurting the students who fail them,” said John Robert Warren, an expert on exit exams and a professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/education/12exit.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Posted this yesterday. Hope there's more interest today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's all we need, a movement to RAISE "standards" even more
so that there will be even MORE dropouts who in turn become cheap labor for employers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Everyone of my nieces and nephews
had to do remedial work in college to be brought up to par before they could begin regular classes. Passing a child through who is not ready isn't doing them any favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What makes you think all kids should be pushed towards college?
They shouldn't be. That's why I am opposed to these stupid "exit exams" in high school. There should be far more emphasis on vocational training, not college.

Do you think it is doing kids any favors to force them to drop out, costing society FAR more in the long run in prison costs, welfare, low-wage jobs, etc.?

I don't want the "standards" upped because it is obvious why they are being upped. The standards aren't EVER good enough for these reformer assholes. They WANT dropouts because they are cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What you said!
Our K-12 schools are supposed to be preparing our kids for life as independent adults. A college education is not necessary especially in this economy where so many college graduates are employed in the service industry.

As NCLB took over our schools vocational programs were dropped. I think there is a connection between that and the dropout rate. Kids who aren't interested or who can't afford college are more likely to drop out when the only courses available to them are college prep courses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It should be the way it was when I was in high school.
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 01:16 PM by tonysam
We had "career clusters" in addition to college preparation courses, so that students could train in office work, welding, auto mechanics, carpentry, and other fields. You know, useful fields for those students not inclined to go to college.

But of course vocationally-trained high school graduates are not what the privatizers want. They want a cheap labor pool of those kids who can't cut college-level coursework and so they are forced out of school altogether or have to get GEDs, which are not valued by these same privatizers.

I saw through this "standards" crap way, way back in the late 1970s-early 1980s when "compentency" exams were first instituted on high school students. The "standards" would NEVER be good enough for these "reformers"; they would simply move the goal posts.

You are now seeing little kids being forcefed algebra concepts in elementary school and fullblown algebra in middle school--LONG before many students can handle it because of cognitive thinking/abstract thinking issues. This difficult subject is being taught some three to four years EARLIER than when I was going through school (fullblown algebra was taught in 10th grade and above). This was a way I believe to "track" kids years before they entered high school, much less what they did beyond high school.

In other words, the "standards" crap is one way of creating a permanent underclass in our country. This was more a political and economic goal than an educational one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am saying that
these kids should not have to have remedial classes to catch them up on stuff they should have learned in high school.
This is junior college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Nothing like college grads in the work force who can't divide by 10
are these the doctors you want operating on you and the nurses measuring a dose of a drug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Don't doctors and nurses have to take competency tests to be licensed?
Seems like that would weed out the ones who are math challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Who wants incompetent idiots in the work force - I don't want to pay them if they can't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Texas apparently has an easy graduation exam - one question:
"Are you a God-fearin' Republican?"

Some people have been known to cheat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zacherystaylor Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excessive costs
"The exams are not cheap. Education officials in Pennsylvania estimate it will cost $176 million to develop and administer the tests and model curriculum through 2014-15, and about $31 million to administer each year after that."

In adition to reforming the way education is handled so that children will focus more on the top priorities we need reform to cut the cost of education without cutting quality. There needs to be more openness about why these cost so much.

They should have open books so that we know where all this money is going.

Education reform should also involve reform of the copyright laws. Copyright laws are keeping educational costs much higher than they should be and controling information so that the public doesn't have the information they need to make decisions in elections about all subjects.

Information is organized better and made available to everyone it will make education lessexpensive and enable everyone to help educate them selves if they're determined enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC