Ruling Limits State’s Power in School Suspensions.

[elleng]

In a ruling that puts new restraints on get-tough “zero tolerance” discipline, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled Friday that schools must provide strong reasons for denying alternative schooling or tutoring to students after they are suspended for misbehavior.

The case was brought on behalf of two girls who were suspended for five months in 2008 after a brief fistfight at their high school in Beaufort County that involved no weapons or injuries. The suit did not question the district’s right to suspend them, but protested the additional, harsher step the district took, denying them access to the county’s alternative school for troubled students or help with study at home.

Legal experts said the decision, in a case that had drawn national attention from civil rights groups, children’s advocates and school leaders, was likely to be cited as a precedent as other states confront similar issues.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/09/us/09suspend.html?hpw

[proud2BlibKansan]

1. 5 months for a fight seems kind of extreme

But I do agree that they should have been provided an alternative education.

[ThomCat]

2. Very damned extreme! And then to deny them access to

any other school or tutoring too? :wtf:

They were blatantly trying to force these kids to either drop out of school against their will or pack up and move to another school district. I'm glad the school district lost, because no school district should have the power to force a kid to drop out.

[kdt]

3. unnecessary

5 months for that? a bit harsh