Anti-teacher bill up in the state leg:
CHICAGO - Under the guise of "school reform," big corporate foundations, banking and speculative hedge fund investors are pulling out all stops to ram a measure through the Illinois state legislature that outlaws teachers' right to strike, and eliminates tenure and seniority rights.
The measure, deceptively called the Performance Counts Act, was actually written by these same interests and is expected to be voted on in the state House within days.
The three teachers' unions, including CTU, have offered an alternative plan, but according to this commenter, it's still a give-away:
The General Assembly is notorious for last-minute deals that rarely work in our favor. So, why should it be different this time?
Going in to this lame duck session the teachers unions’ leadership had two goals.
Like with the runaway train in the movie Unstoppable, they hoped to be Denzel. Perhaps they could keep the train from becoming a catastrophe by slowing it down.
They also wanted the three main union players, the IEA, IFT and the CTU, to jointly agree upon an alternative proposal that a majority in the GA could agree to and was less draconian than the reformy proposals.
They also wanted the three main union players, the IEA, IFT and the CTU, to jointly agree upon an alternative proposal that a majority in the GA could agree to and was less draconian than the reformy proposals.
Given just about two weeks to draft an alternative proposal, lawyers for the Chicago Teachers Union, the Illinois Federation of Teachers and the Illinois Education Association worked through the holidays and came up with a plan they call “Accountability for All.”
Although they differ in the details, the proposals have similar elements. Both would link a teacher’s classroom performance to the granting of tenure, recertification and decisions on dismissal for incompetence, filling job vacancies or reductions in force.
Performance would be measured in part by student achievement. Both proposals would streamline dismissal, but the union version would require better support for teachers in such areas as professional development and remediation.
While the members have been bombarded with requests to call our reps to support the union alternative proposal, I can’t bring myself to support the further erosion of our union rights, even if it is not as bad as the reformy one. It is not as bad by very little.
http://preaprez.wordpress.com/