Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Response To Arne's Smarmy Letter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:10 PM
Original message
A Response To Arne's Smarmy Letter
Edited on Thu May-19-11 06:13 PM by chervilant
Here, in it's entirety, is the rebuttal I wrote to Mr. Duncan's patronizing and mendacious letter to our nation's teachers. I've included the responses to my letter. My intent with this post is to enlighten those Democrats who are in denial about this administration's assault on public education.



Chervilant says:
May 15, 2011 at 1:29 am
Please, let’s cut to the chase here, shall we?

First and foremost, the deliberately informed among us are well aware of the economics of this assault on teachers and unions, and who stands to benefit. Furthermore, Mr. Duncan, we know exactly who considers the economics of this assault a ‘verboten’ topic. To whit: advocates for teachers–and for TRUE reform of public education–are quickly directed away from this topic of ‘who benefits’ with the adjuration, “don’t come across as a nutty conspiracy theorist!” Thus, we teachers continue to struggle with helping others understand that the current assault on teachers and unions is conflated with exactly who profits from privatization.

Second, most of the REAL problems in public education stem from federal legislation (NCLB, now RTTT) which mandates stultifying and pedantic standardized testing; AND from the severe and worsening decrease in funding for our schools, libraries, head start programs, free meals, field trips, and ALL the measurable, tangible resources required to provide a quality education for our children. Of course, you and your sycophants don’t want the hoi polloi to get a clue about this, so the well-paid media propagandists have identified and vilified the ‘common enemy’: mean, selfish, lazy, narcissistic, BAD TEACHERS and EVIL UNIONS!

Third, almost half (42%) of all children in the United States live in low-income households, where their parent(s) earn just enough to cover basic expenses (current data from NCCP). Personally, I think this is an under-representation of the number of children who live in households defined as ‘low-income,’ given that less than one thousand people in the US own and control better than 95% of our nation’s wealth. Nevertheless, ‘low-income household’ is synonymous with precarious employment, frequent moves, poor nutrition, and a multitude of other threats to our children’s well-being, not to mention their ability to LEARN.

In short, children of low-income households must contend with a host of social, behavioral and psychological issues, all of which impede a child’s ability to learn. And, for children in poverty level households (about 21%), mere survival trumps education every time. These seldom mentioned facts are clearly antithetical to your agency’s current assault on teachers and unions, so we activists are shouted down or diminished whenever we bring up poverty and its measurable impact on our children AND on public education.

Here are a few of the benefits you and your supporters might expect to reap:

1) Privatization will mean profits for newly minted private education groups, as well as some of the Bush clan (and any other wealthy investors who plan to snarf crumbs from the privatization platter).

2) Those members of the wealthy elite who still need to convince themselves they are acting out of compassion—and giving charitably—can allude to their commitment to our children and to education.

3) Everyone KNOWS that only the uber wealthy possess an intellectual prowess that elevates them above the poor, pathetic hoi polloi, both materially and intellectually! Why, if we didn’t have the wonderful, paternalistic corporatists around to tell us how to vote, what to wear, what to watch, and what to believe–why, where, oh, where would we BE?!?!

Now that I’ve gotten all that off my chest, let me assure you, Mr. Duncan, that your indefensible machinations will not prevent me from teaching. My students routinely tell me that I help them understand math, and that I make learning math fun. My STUDENTS’ assessments of my ability to teach are what really toasts my bread.

When I teach, I am solely invested in finding whatever methods work for ALL of my students, in order to give them multiple opportunities to have “AHA!” moments as they learn to play math, the oldest game we humans have created. Those “AHA!” moments are the big brass ring for me, Mr. Duncan—and for countless other EXCELLENT teachers across this nation. And you can NEVER take that away from us.


Here are the responses:

Shirley Burns says:
May 16, 2011 at 2:00 pm
As a retired teacher with 40 years in public education, I think it’s about time teachers began to speak out more and fight back against all the false impressions perpetrated by the media that teachers are overpaid, lazy, and incompetent. In my 40 years of teaching I found that about 98% of the people I taught with were very dedicated professionals. I have e-mailed President Obama on several occasions regarding this issue as I’m sure many others of you have done. Unfortunately he has a background of attending private, not public schools, and I don’t think understands public education, and from everything I’ve read, I don’t think Mr. Duncan and most members of Congress do either. Villifying teachers and teachers’ unions may get great media publicity, but it will never solve education’s problems; it just drives good teachers from the profession. Evaluating teachers based on test scores is a very simplistic and unrealistic solution to a very complex problem; it just won’t work. It’s about time someone started listening to teachers and including them in the development of solutions to these complex problems, and let’s start by getting rid of “No Child Left Behind”. I retired from teaching when all this emphasis on tests was just beginning. I consider myself lucky because I taught during a time when teachers could be creative and students could have fun in school. Those of you teaching today have my support and sympathy. I don’t know how you do it!




Brooke says:
May 16, 2011 at 4:42 pm
You rock.


And, finally:

Alicia says:
May 16, 2011 at 6:57 pm
Awesome response. I too am a teacher and have grown tired of the endless assaults on our profession. I voted for President Obama and really want to vote for him again. However, if Arne Duncan is staying on as Secretary of Education, I will either hold my nose while voting or simply stay home. Please find someone who cares about all of our children and is not working against our public school system.


Our nation will crumble if we continue to sit on the sidelines, complacently and silently, while the corporate megalomaniacs dismantle public education.
Refresh | +12 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was poorly written and didn't respond to even one of Duncan's points.
Teachers are pissed off, and rightly so. Duncan's letter of May 2 doesn't get him off the hook for previous behavior and poorly considered comments. However, the open letter, if written by a teacher, is an embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really?
I wrote the letter, Buzz Clik, but I'm sure you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I have no idea who you are or who the author of the letter is. Part of being on a board like this.
Edited on Thu May-19-11 09:41 PM by Buzz Clik
Sorry if I've offended you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You are kidding, aren't you?
You must be. Otherwise, you are just plain insulting someone who wrote an intelligent letter with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I couldn't pick him out of a lineup of two people. He's not my man.
You didn't bother to read my post, did you. You just saw that I was challenging a poster, so you decided a lame attempt at attacking me with attempt to address my words.

How mature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It was a socialist rant.
I wasn't kidding.

It doesn't make Arne less of a jerk, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mathias Kohler Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. To me the heart of this letter
was the connection that this teacher achieves with his students. This is the heart of teaching. It is a major source of student motivation. The letter was able to convey this, so bravo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Excellent letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC