Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stonewall: The birth of gay power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
dcsmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:35 PM
Original message
Stonewall: The birth of gay power
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 06:20 PM by proud patriot
(edited for copyright purposes-proud patriot Moderator Democratic
Underground)

SOURCE SITE
http://www.isreview.org/issues/63/feat-stonewall.shtml



Sherry Wolf is the author of the forthcoming Sexuality and Socialism: History, Politics and Theory of Gay Liberation (Haymarket Books, 2009). Here the ISR prints an excerpt from her book. Wolf is on the editorial board of the ISR.

THE SIXTIES is often perceived as an era of social upheaval and orgiastic revelry. But for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) folks in America, the efflorescence of sexual expression did not begin until the waning months of that decade in the heart of the nation’s then-largest bohemian enclave and gay ghetto, New York’s Greenwich Village. The Stonewall Riots that began in the wee hours of June 28, 1969,1 lasted six nights and catapulted the issue of sexual liberation out of the Dark Ages and into a new era.

The relative freedoms and social acceptance that millions of particularly urban American LGBT people experience today would have seemed as surreal to that earlier generation as the prospect of electing an African-American president. On the heels of the U.S. military’s postwar purge of gays, President Eisenhower signed a 1953 executive order that established “sexual perversion” as grounds for being fired from government jobs. And since employment records were shared with private industry, exposure or suspicion of homosexuality could render a person unemployable and destitute. “Loitering in a public toilet” was an offense that could blacklist a man from work and social networks, as lists of arrestees were often printed in newspapers and other public records. Most states had laws barring homosexuals from receiving professional licenses, which could also be revoked upon discovery. Sex between consenting adults of the same sex, even in a private home, could be punishable for up to life in prison, confinement in a mental institution, or even castration.

In 1917, foreign LGBT people were barred from legally immigrating to the United States due to their supposed “psychopathic personality disorder.”2 Illinois was the only state in the country, since 1961, where homosexuality was not explicitly outlawed. New York’s penal code called for the arrest of anyone in public wearing fewer than three items of clothing “appropriate” to their gender. And California’s Atascadero State Hospital was compared with a Nazi concentration camp and known as a “Dachau for queers” for performing electroshock and other draconian “therapies” on gays and lesbians. One legal expert argues that in the 1960s, “The homosexual…was smothered by law.”3

This repression existed alongside a growing acknowledgement of the existence of lesbians and gays in literature, theater, movies, and newspapers. Cultural outlets exposed an expanding gay world to people who may never have known of its existence, including those who would finally discover affirmation and a name for their desires. In an interview with NPR’s Terry Gross, Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) co-founder Phyllis Lyon recounts how when she met her lover and the group’s co-founder Del Martin in 1949 she had no idea there was such a possibility as lesbianism.4 By the 1960s, that would no longer be possible for an adult woman in urban America. Bestsellers like James Baldwin’s Another Country and Mary McCarthy’s The Group included lesbian characters in their plots. And the New York Times ran a front-page story on the city’s gay male scene as “the most sensitive open secret,” leading to a spate of feature articles—ranging from hostile to sympathetic—in Life, Look, Newsweek, and Time.5

(snip)
]
Text

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. call me crazy but I belive that people who create good content and copyright it
should have the copyright respected.

You seem to have copied an entire page from another site and posted it here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I remember watching Stonewall on the TV with my mother
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 12:53 PM by The empressof all
She was frantic. To this day I still not sure if her anxiety was for his safety or for her own discomfort with what she would tell the neighbors and extended family who could see him on the news. His gayness was the Open Secret in our family. It remained that way throughout his 25 year relationship with his partner, and countless family events with his "friend" welcomed into our family fold. "It" was just never discussed.

About 6 months before he died of complications related to his HIV I broached the subject with him. He was shocked that we knew all along that he was gay. He was shocked that of his sisters, three of us could give a rip about who he loved as long as he was happy. All those years he assumed that we would "oust" him from our lives if we opened this secret to the sunlight.

I left my family of origin home at 17 and only saw him once or at most twice a year until he died. I kept the family "order" during those few hours were were together all those years. I didn't want to get "ousted" from their lives. We had a lot in common....and it was stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. This appears to be copyrighted material.
I think book excepts qualify as such. :)

When posting material on DU that is copyrighted by other authors, please limit your posts to an excerpt of the article of four paragraphs with a link to the original source of the article. For further clarification, please see the "Copyright" section of the expanded DU rules here.

Please let me know if have any questions, and thank you for your consideration.

racaulk
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. we should observe the appropriate rules for posting articles.
however there is one important point to reiterate -- we have had to deal with hate from within our own community while striving to get the outside world to recognize our equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcsmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. sorry
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank you for your research effort. I wonder, can you go back and edit this page?
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 02:30 PM by bluedawg12
If you could shorten it up to meet fair use and copyright reg type issues, with the link cited, we could just zip over to the website and read the whole page?

Maybe the mods could help out? Or they could just delete the entire topic for the moment and give you a chance to repost with the article snipped to the proper length?

It looks like good reading and it's a shame to get derailed on this, if it could be corrected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcsmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i tried to edit it. too late
here is the link if you cannot get to it.


http://www.isreview.org/issues/63/feat-stonewall.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There is another remedy.
Maybe the mods can remove it for you completely if you PM them and ask nicely? Then, you can start fresh.

I am not sure you want to go through the work of editing and reposting, but, that would solve the problem.

I do have the link and it works just dandy.


I'll have to return and read it when I finish merrily digging out of three feet of gay snow. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's really not a problem.
For my post above, I wanted to put that out our general rules regarding copyrighted material, because I know you are a relatively new member here. But I also wanted to make my statement public, just as a general reminder for all of our membership.

I wasn't picking on you, I promise. :)

You'll note also that one of our lead moderators has snipped your post down to a more reasonable size. I know the copyrighting rules can be a little confusing--to be honest, I'm not sure that I completely understand it all myself. So if you're ever not sure if an article is copyrighted or not, and the article is a long one, the "4 paragraph rule" is a good rule of thumb to use, just to be safe.

Welcome to DU, by the way! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What a nice moderator, and the one who edited it too!
Cool, now to tuck in to the thread. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh, now you stop that!
:blush:




:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Awww...shucks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. One thing that jumps out from this shortie version is how the "culture" and intellectuals
and writers supported gay presence and gay rights.

It just does not seem as hot a topic for str8 writers today, or maybe it's just passe'?

I recall reading about the shake downs by the NYPD in the gay and drag bars and how that item of clothing rule was actually enforced to the point of arresting people.

For anyone who thinks this is a new movement and we are being impatient, I think not. This struggle has been going on for a long time and only now are we to the point of actually demanding being treated like full human beings with full human rights. Prior to recent times, we were just asking not to be openly hunted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC