.
What's going on? AP sucks. AP has
always sucked. It's a . . . very poor source of news. I say this because AP has
lousy writers who are not trained to write correctly and factually. Typically, their short, clipped stories contain twists and turns that make it difficult if not impossible for their audience - the reader - to understand what it is that AP is writing about.
Here, the AP writer makes leaps of logic that are not legally relevant to the issue. One of the sorest spots of so-called "journalism" as written by AP is the law. They truly suck at it. It could be said that this AP article was written by someone who truly has not a clue as to the subject matter. Again, this is not unusual coming from AP.
Whether you or others want to believe that AP and/or this AP writer has a "hidden agenda" against gays is up to you. I'll simply write it off as the lousy "journalism" that AP typically does. However, discrimination against gays as "journalism" should not exist.
_______________________________________
edited to add: And welcome to DU, kbm8795
.