Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oregon Civil Unions Bill Officially Dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:12 AM
Original message
Oregon Civil Unions Bill Officially Dead
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/08/080505oregon.htm

The Oregon Legislature ended its second-longest session ever at 6:20 a.m. Friday, allowing a bill that would have provided civil unions for same-sex couples to die without coming to a vote.

The bill would have created a civil unions registry and grant same-sex couples many of the rights available to married couples including inheritance benefits, pensions, property rights when a partner dies, and the right to make medical decisions for a partner.

The legislation also would have included gays and lesbians in Oregon's nondiscrimination act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. You have probably seen the analysis in the Mercury and the Willy Week
about how the push for SB 1000 was just fucked up by our legislators, who were later just played like boogers by House Speaker Karen Minnis.

The Dems need to get their fucking parliamentary shit together for the next session. This session was an embarrassment.

Very sad. SB 1000 had the votes to pass, but was left to smother under Minnis' fat ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not an Oregonian, but I have the feeling
that Minnis and her tactics won't play too well with the voters come the next election.

She showed her butt too many times on this, particularly since the constitutional amendment passed by voters deliberately was worded so that civil unions can be created.

And I wish SOMEONE would start making it clear to the public that many of the special benefits that only "married" people received were not designed as marriage perks - they were reflections of the state's need to regulate proper health and disposal of bodies.

This is where I think we always drop the damned ball. . .by not pointing out that the Right believes the State has much more power to regulate marriage than has ever been allowed. It seems to me that it has been rather clear for decades that governments are limited in that they must show a NEED to provide special treatment only to married couples. . .and Minnis and her lot should be fried with this information.

No one, for example, wrote a hospital visitation statute simply to establish another "perk" for marriage. These people need to get way over themselves and their fantasized self-importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC