Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel urges ending UCMJ’s sodomy ban (xpost from Veterans)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 06:48 AM
Original message
Panel urges ending UCMJ’s sodomy ban (xpost from Veterans)
Panel urges ending UCMJ’s sodomy ban
By Lisa M. Novak, Stars and Stripes
European edition, Tuesday, October 27, 2009

A panel of legal scholars has suggested that Congress remove sodomy as a crime punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a recommendation that could boost efforts to end a ban on gays serving openly in the U.S. military.

The Commission on Military Justice recommended that Article 125, which deals with sodomy, be repealed, arguing that “most acts of consensual sodomy committed by consenting military personnel are not prosecuted, creating a perception that prosecution of this sexual behavior is arbitrary.”

In its report — dated October 2009 — the commission suggested several changes be made to the UCMJ, including a requirement that law enforcement officials videotape interrogations. The panel’s discussion of Article 125 has gotten the attention of “don’t ask, don’t tell” opponents.

“Public opinion about private, consensual sexual conduct has shifted dramatically since the military sodomy ban was written into law almost a hundred years ago,” according to Nathaniel Frank, a senior research fellow at the Palm Center, a University of California, Santa Barbara, research institute focusing on gays and the military.

“To say that gays should be banned from the military for this outdated reason makes no sense,” Frank was quoted as saying in a center news release.


Rest of article at: http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65663
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone against ending the sodomy ban can suck it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. There is a huge difference between forced sodomy, and consensual sodomy
It has to stay in the UCMJ, however relations between consenting adults should be defined as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They're Not Talking About Forced Sodomy.
Forced sodomy is rape. Rape is always going to be against the law, military or otherwise.

Why would you even post this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. sodomy laws are the ultimate invasion of privacy
It's like the government telling you you have to use your right hand only, your pink parts in one configuration only, and in the missionary position with the guy on top and the gal on the bottom, and the lights out for heavens sake.

Dear U.S. Gummint, et al:

GET THE FUCK OUT OF OUR BEDROOMS. And stay the fuck out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. The UCMJ is a bastion of outdated laws.
Adultery is also against the law under the UCMJ. It's long past time to get rid of off of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC