Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State of the Union 2011: Obama says 'don't ask, don't tell' to formally end this year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:34 AM
Original message
State of the Union 2011: Obama says 'don't ask, don't tell' to formally end this year
State of the Union 2011: Obama says 'don't ask, don't tell' to formally end this year
By Ed O'Keefe
Posted at 9:03 PM ET, 01/25/2011

President Obama vowed Tuesday to formally end the ban on gays in the military this year, offering the most details yet on how quickly the military plans to end "don't ask, don't tell."

"Starting this year, no American will be forbidden from serving the country they love because of who they love," Obama said. "And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC. It is time to leave behind the divisive battles of the past. It is time to move forward as one nation."

Several of the nation's top colleges and universities, including Harvard, Columbia and Stanford, have blocked military recruiters from using campus buildings and offices, but have said they would eventually provide full access once the military ends its "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

"This has been a difference of principle that I think no one has wanted, but it has been a longstanding and very difficult matter," Columbia University President Lee Bollinger said in an interview last year. "If it were resolved with the elimination of 'don't ask, don't tell,' there would be an enormous feeling of gratitude and openness, more openness to the relations with the military."

Bollinger, who also sits on the board of The Washington Post Co., did warn, however, that allowing ROTC recruiters back on campus might take some time. "It would have to go through a process and people would have to discuss it. It's not just a matter where the president can order this to happen," he said.



unhappycamper comment: "And with that change, I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC." :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thats great news but...
How is this going to work with the UCMJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetiredTrotskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh-huh...
I'll believe it when I see it. And as the poster above me asked, is the portion of the UCMJ that punishes homosexuality going to be jettisoned too? Because if it isn't then we are back to 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And I'm sure once the certification is done, some people still won't believe it.
Has anyone here read the repeal bill? It's like a page long, and is very specific in it's wording. It also charges the Pentagon to recommend any changes needed to the UCMJ in light of a non-discrimination policy.

As far as the UCMJ is currently concerned, it depends a lot on your interpretation of the effect of Lawrence vs. Texas on the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has held that LvT does apply to Article 125 of the UCMJ, except as is applied to "maintaining discipline," which was the reason given for the 1983 and 1994 policies banning gays in the military. In simpler terms, they held that the statute was only constitutional so long as homosexual behavior was found by existing law to be directly contrary to acceptable military discipline.

If you assume that LvT doesn't apply to the UCMJ, then technically "sodomy" remains illegal in the Armed Forces; however, with a non-discrimination policy in place, it would be relegated to the same level of illegality as adultery, and "open and notorious" fornication. In other words, you'd have to be caught in the act to be in trouble. Also it bears mentioning that Article 125 also bans hetersexual "sodomy" (which encompasses all oral and anal sex), which is not aggressively prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's part of the "grand compromise"
They can be gay, they just can't DO gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. "I call on all of our college campuses to open their doors to our military recruiters and the ROTC"
Apparently the President has forgotten his commitment to equality for the T in GLBT. Transgendered Americans are still barred from serving and any institution that covers Transgendered persons in it't anti-discrimination policy should not open up the campus to the ROTC until ALL Americans can serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC